Using the human construct of time, time began when the first event occurred.
If no events ever occur, time makes absolutely no sense.
Yes, M-theory, string and super string theory, black holes, worm holes and the Tenth dimension, etc.
The key is to keep an open mind regardless of which side you're on.
Then you're capable of change without it becoming a major catastrophe in your life.
I take no sides here, I am my own man and call it like I see it regardless of who it is, unlike many on here, you included.
Some theorize that the dimension of time is a figment of our imagination.
Go figure.
Studying the history of something (literature, art, the earth itself or whatever ) isn't completely useless because it may help you envision what's gonna happen in several decades, or even centuries, and all you need to do is find out some sort of principle from the past phenomena. For example, without a great knowledge of human history, Karl Marx would've never created such works like Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto that would be used by commies to brainwash millions, if not billions of people.
I was just pointing the sad obvious truth that America is a business. If you are going to insult me about my job, at least know the facts. Working at the fitting room at Target? That's cute. Thanks for playing ass s.
And the site affectionately know as "The Troll Forum" continues to live up to it's reputation.
Time?
The Evolutionist's have only had a few years since 1859 when Darwin (their one true master) came up with a Book.
Imagination? Read the book
We never debated Evolution in the TRoll forum, we didn't really care who we are or where we came from, hence being a "TRoll"And the site affectionately know as "The Troll Forum" continues to live up to it's reputation.
Go to the MIT forums and read where many students and a few professors avoid debating this issue with me as I have presented time and time again solid evidence that destroyed the topic of Evolution long ago...(not the word "Evolution" the man from ape version of the word Evolution)
But from time to time I try not to forget my online fans and debate in forum's like ST (to show after my huge ego I can still get along with the commoners)
look how many in the last three pages avoided me, even Blake? a vato ..... who sometimes acts like that drunk skinny guy in the movie The Perfect Storm trying to hit on that fat lady at the bar. he knows his skinny fish smelling,meth mouth ass is desperate they sail out the next day (hence he seems so desperate) ......to me, that says a lot...
"Bill, how were the atoms created that caused the big bang"
bill: uh, well, uh, that's the mystery
They avoid debating with you because you're an idiot. So the smartest people in the world pretty much shrug your troll attempts off because they have nothing to gain by entertaining your silly ass.
so nolyfe is a jeebo ?
An idiot who thinks he is on to something. A delusional idiot.
Divorced from reality and stupid, a special combination... Why is he not in some kind of halfway house.
You're way too caught up in style over substance. It's probably why your reading comprehension skills completely suck.
This is about creationists condemning evolution or at the least, wanting to put intelligent design in the same science book with evolution.
Aggressive creationists like Ham do nothing but delay society from moving forward.
You're the only one that calls this site the troll forum.And the site affectionately know as "The Troll Forum" continues to live up to it's reputation.
Because the TRoll forum closed.
You might want to change your reply style if you want to join the MIT forums.
(A heads up)
Divorced from reality and stupid, a special combination... Why is he not in some kind of halfway house.
Debunking my facts would prove your point rather than outdated insults.
(Another heads up)
lol "debunking my facts".
Gee, I wonder why the MIT folks don't dive right into that.
Creationism in its strictest sense is the logical null which has to be disproven. The atheists in this thread are being foolish by acting like this is not the case. But it's just sad to see so many people who don't want to accept that some random people just made up most of the scientific tenets (shape and rotation of the Earth, diversity of life) in their religion. That doesn't make the moral parts bad to use as a guideline for personal lives, but by no means does it deserve a place in this debate. If anything, people are holding their faith back by tying it to old-world and already-debunked ideas.
Argument from ignorance is a logical fallacy. Assertions without proof need not be disproved.
I think we'll find out when we die
ok then how old in your mind is earth ? if your altess is kind enough to answer the question. Apparently you are smarter than MIT dudes and I'm no MIT dude so I'm not sure a simple mind like me can understand a grand mind like you but it is worth the try.
after all you are telling it the best: "But from time to time I try not to forget my online fans and debate in forum's like ST (to show after my huge ego I can still get along with the commoners)"
Nope. We have tons of evidence already. It's called the causal closure of the physical, and it is one of the key tenets to science. If we are to believe the universe was created spontaneously, that takes proof, since we've never observed something that had no cause.
Now if you mean you don't have to prove that it's not a being named God who will send you to heaven or , that's true.
how so ?
They make you take a science class on the way out.how so ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote