Reply With Quote
Arsenal are incredibly naive if they think they can win a premiership le with Giroud up front. Arsenal's Defense is quality. Midfield is also good(when healthy). But, goddamn, they have the worst strikers/forwards in the league.
Wilshere and Giroud...Jesus christ.
Arsenal are incredibly naive if they think they can win a premiership le with Giroud up front. Arsenal's Defense is quality. Midfield is also good(when healthy). But, goddamn, they have the worst strikers/forwards in the league.
HOLY Wilshere is garbage
He has ing lead feet.
Ramsey's Godlike form was the one who made Arsenal go on top of the league and Wenger is the idiot who doesn't spend to bring in fresh bodies. He's running a lot of these players into the ground.
Giroud is also a bad fit for this Arsenal team. They need a quick, pacy forward. Someone that can finish runs, won't be caught offside a dozen times every match. Giroud's too ing slow. He has size but he doesn't even use it often(seems to be flailing to the ground more often than not).
I actually thought Wilshere did more good than bad. Granted, he ed up some situations, but he also was one of the few Arsenal playes trying to spark the attacking game. Özil at least looked more active tonight. Good second half from both sides, the game could have gone either way there.
Giroud is smart and fits in Arsenal's tiki taka system. But when that's not working and even though he was playing like when he was injured, Walcott's speed on the sides and in the middle on counters is sorely missed.
Arsenal is just too predictable on offense right now. Teams are just clogging the middle and daring Arsenal to beat them on the wings.
His ups were potentially game changing and sparked the dangerous counters by Man U. He was the catalyst to that near-goal by Van Persie. Ozil looked better though.
Predictable game. Man U was content sitting back and waiting for the counter, especially in the second half. Arsenal didn't have the creativity to do anything about it. Kinda like the Chelsea game.
The only good news is Arsenal just needs to play Man city and Chelsea once more to be done with the top 4. With Man city & Chelsea dropping points it's still possible they can win the le by beating scrubs like Real did some years ago. Unlikely, but possible.
Nothing new
POS has been overrated for a long time
Meanwhile, Urube@ner is screwing my fantasy team by not scoring for the 2nd straight game
Are you ing trolling me ?????
Giroud is fine for a mid-table club but he's not going to cut it for a team with le aspirations. Arsenal's going to come up short this season and Giroud will be the primary reason why.
Deschamps has asked Lloris to talk to Bentaleb because he is afraid he will choose to play for Algeria.
the mind games are on
Arsene Wenger: "Jose Mourinho is afraid of failure"
Jose Mourinho: "Arsene Wenger is the master of failure"
Game set and match, portube@ner
Arsene Wenger: "Jose Mourinho is afraid of failure"
Jose Mourinho: "Arsene Wenger is the master of failure"
As much as I've given Wanker a hard time, it's dumb to call him a failure
portube@ner must've forgot how he got cucked and ran out of his biggest job with RMAO
^
Mou can call Arsčne a failure imo.
He has won a CL and has beaten Barcuefa.
So its official now :Deschamps has asked Lloris to talk to Bentaleb because he is afraid he will choose to play for Algeria.
Bentaleb will play for Algeria.
He also did jack at his time @ the most historic, richest club in football history. 1 La Liga in 1 Copa del Rey in a 2 team league over 4 seasons tbh?
He's spent 5x more money on players than Wanker's entire 17 year tenure. Using his logic he should've killed himself after he lost the locker room @ RMAO and got booted
^
Son you just missed my lolfrance post.
(i guess that's because Mou got in your head)
Looking at their résumés and head to head record, it's pretty obvious who's closer to failure between Mou and Wenger. Mou has 5 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses against Wenger.
Almost a decade without winning a le sounds like a failure to me tbh.
And if you're going to bring up budgets, look at what Mou accomplished in Portugal with a budget a lot smaller than what Wenger has at his disposal. Back to back european les (Europa and Champions League).
I'm not arguing either is a failure, I'm saying that's idiotic logic. Failure compared to who?
They both have les, but Mourinho has more important ones. If Mourinho says Wenger's dry spell is failure then his stint at Real Madrid where he had half a billion worth of transfers was a failure. I haven't seen him call his time there as a failure. Why would you bring up Porto and not the 1 billion spent @ Chelsea and Real?
I'm just saying, a club of Arsenal's dimension that already experienced success on a championship level multiple times, 8 years without winning a single le should be considered a failure imo.
And again when you have the kind of record Mourinho has against Wenger and an amazing résumé with multiple clubs to boot, Mourinho earned the right to talk smack to Wenger.
lol mancity chelse game
whose the fck that decided to have both team playing in their blue colors
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
