Woj: Spurs have traded De Colo for Austin Daye

[TheGoldStandard]

You can get that for Bonner/Errors, nobody dies

If Pop had to choose between death and Bonner/Errors leaving... he'd give them thumbs down...

[ElNono]

If Pop had to choose between death and Bonner/Errors leaving... he'd give them thumbs down...

Just kill Boylen, and we'll call it even

[ace3g]

My theory on #spurs trade: Pop/RC on phone with GMs, Patty Mills walked by, they said G'Daye Mate (instinctively) and Toronto says ok...

[ChumpDumper]

Convenient that Chump posts something he says he cannot prove

So Chump says people argue about things that don't matter and are "tiny", but he proceeds to post about things that no one can prove? That's just him protecting his rep so he can never be wrong I guess. How can you be wrong if you post stuff that no one can prove?

Also, can you please explicitly explain how my guidelines on how to prove what you said would not work? If you say that it was obvious that I would hate any trade and you saw it coming because it's what I do, why wouldn't looking up the past few trades and my comments not be sufficient to support that?

i can see you really want to avoid explaining how you were wrong at all costs.

i'm sure you likes the RJ for Jack trade. Which others did you say were unequivocally good -- nothing your brilliant mind could improve upon?

[TheGoldStandard]

Just kill Boylen, and we'll call it even

Agreed

[ChumpDumper]

Austin won't need a number on his jersey, only a name --- "Austin."

Which he will wear in Austin.

[james evans]

they should have included ayres in that trade

[Boomersgold]

Kinda wanted De Colo to stay. I definitely saw major improvements in both his game and his at ude this season. Hope he does well in Toronto.

[024]

I would be surprised if Daye got anything more than garbage time. The Spurs traded one garbage player for another. At least they got the position right...

[DPG21920]

i can see you really want to avoid explaining how you were wrong at all costs.

i'm sure you likes the RJ for Jack trade. Which others did you say were unequivocally good -- nothing your brilliant mind could improve upon?

I can clearly see how you are avoiding that you are wrong at all costs. You won't answer anything directly although they are very simple suggestions. You also just admitted you are a liar. If you already said I would would gnash my teeth at all moves, then turn around and cite the RJ for Jack trade, that shows you either lied to prop your ego up, or you have to admit you were wrong.

Were you wrong? Type out this sentence: "When I typed that it was obvious that DPG wouldn't like this move because he doesn't like any moves, I was ________________"

[jermaine]

So this guy cant even stoot? He's 6'11 an cant play defense or rebound? Please say he can someone! Please

[ChumpDumper]

I can clearly see how you are avoiding that you are wrong at all costs. You won't answer anything directly although they are very simple suggestions. You also just admitted you are a liar. If you already said I would would gnash my teeth at all moves, then turn around and cite the RJ for Jack trade, that shows you either lied to prop your ego up, or you have to admit you were wrong.

Were you wrong? Type out this sentence: "When I typed that it was obvious that DPG wouldn't like this move because he doesn't like any moves, I was ________________"

Were you in favor of the RJ/Jack trade?

Show me a link to it.

Are there any others?

Show me links to them.

Or just list them along with the times you were completely wrong.

[Bruno]

So looks like Spurs couldn't get a second round pick while giving up the best player with the best contract. I won't lose sleep over it since De Colo wasn't that good and Daye contract isn't that bad, but that's quite a poor trade. Let's hope Daye will be able to contribute in some way because Spurs have for sure a hole at SF/small ball PF.

The true issue isn't that trade in itself is how Spurs have failed to maximize the opportunity they had given their financial/contractual flexibility since this summer. I just have the feeling they had the tools to improve more the team.

[DPG21920]

Just like you lying about me not liking any trades & just like you lying about me never saying I'm wrong, you look it up. It's right there. The burden of proof is on you. You made the statements, you are the liar. You must prove that you aren't. Either find the last few trades and my negative takes on all of them, or else admit you were wrong.

Search this thread for when I posted about being wrong before or admit you were wrong about that.

These are clear things you said and that are easily provable under these very simple parameters. You seem to be avoiding this a lot for some reason and dodging the questions at hand.

[ElNono]

So looks like Spurs couldn't get a second round pick while giving up the best player with the best contract. I won't lose sleep over it since De Colo wasn't that good and Daye contract isn't that bad, but that's quite a poor trade. Let's hope Daye will be able to contribute in some way because Spurs have for sure a hole at SF/small ball PF.

The true issue isn't that trade in itself is how Spurs have failed to maximize the opportunity they had given their financial/contractual flexibility since this summer. I just have the feeling they had the tools to improve more the team.

it takes two to tango though... maybe they looked and couldn't find/work out a deal they wanted...

[Chewbacca]

People use me to edit their trash posts when they are busted for lying and scrambling for words

[ChumpDumper]

Just like you lying about me not liking any trades & just like you lying about me never saying I'm wrong, you look it up. It's right there. The burden of proof is on you. You made the statements, you are the liar. You must prove that you aren't. Either find the last few trades and my negative takes on all of them, or else admit you were wrong.

Search this thread for when I posted about being wrong before or admit you were wrong about that.

These are clear things you said and that are easily provable under these very simple parameters. You seem to be avoiding this a lot for some reason and dodging the questions at hand.

so you were against the Jack/RJ trade?

OK. That's just as easy to believe. If you can't answer a yes or no question straight you must have something to hide.

[ChumpDumper]

ChumpDumper hurt me, so my child must suffer.

[Chewbacca]

[DPG21920]

Now Chump is shifting the goalposts. It went from "DPG obviously hating every trade" to "were you wrong about your opinion of the trade". Two very different things. Why the shift? You still haven't admitted you were wrong/lied about me not liking any trade.

Let's get through that first, then we can go onto your shifted argument.

[ChumpDumper]

i am fully vaccinated. I neglected to vaccinate my child.

[DPG21920]

so you were against the Jack/RJ trade?

OK. That's just as easy to believe. If you can't answer a yes or no question straight you must have something to hide.

You not answering my yes or no's even when I offer a clear solution shows you have a huge ego, care about your rep and will never admit to being wrong.

But you also say you post about stuff that can't be proven, so there's that too.

Let it go Chump. I bet you can't. I bet you post after this one in this thread while I don't.

[ChumpDumper]

Now Chump is shifting the goalposts. It went from "DPG obviously hating every trade" to "were you wrong about your opinion of the trade". Two very different things. Why the shift? You still haven't admitted you were wrong/lied about me not liking any trade.

Let's get through that first, then we can go onto your shifted argument.

Well, which trades have you liked?

Let's go by your record.

List them and provide links.

And while you were at it, go ahead and list all the times you were completely wrong in your predictions.

[Chewbacca]

[ChumpDumper]

You not answering my yes or no's even when I offer a clear solution shows you have a huge ego, care about your rep and will never admit to being wrong.

But you also say you post about stuff that can't be proven, so there's that too.

Let it go Chump. I bet you can't. I bet you post after this one in this thread while I don't.

Of course I can't prove a negative. What is so difficult to understand about that?

You are free to prove me wrong with one link. I already gave you an instance where I am probably wrong, but you didn't even run with that one. Was I wrong in thinking I was wrong?

That's possible.