Ridiculous amount of fast 40 times. Sammy Watkins is going to be one of the best WR in the NFL
tbf that's the most pointless test at the combine imho
Ridiculous amount of fast 40 times. Sammy Watkins is going to be one of the best WR in the NFL
Clemson breeds for speed
Also, AJ McCarron has looked good today chucking the rock...I was impressed
Jacoby Ford can attest to DD's "clemson breeds for speed" theory.
Evans had a good 40 time, but he looked bad when they made him run that corner route
Paul Richardson will be the best pro of that WR group.
Some honky named Jeff Janis ran a 4.30![]()
Last edited by DeadlyDynasty; 02-23-2014 at 07:31 PM.
Yes they do, Jacoby Ford and James Trapp were legit "world class" sprinters, now add C.J.Spiller, Aires Curee, On the track no less than a half dozen "world class" speedsters,Olympic 200m champ Shawn Crawford their greatest sprinter. Travis Padgett a one time NCAA 100m record holder. One of the few schools on a par with the SEC in the speed department.
Believe it or not Sammy Watkins wouldn't make the All Clemson 100m.
There is no "track footballer" on that list of receivers. Nobody with any legit college track credentials.
Texas another non SEC school that has given the NFL a lot of speed over the years.
Last edited by Avante; 02-23-2014 at 08:05 PM.
That (along with the list of other times) is hand timed I take it? Those always differ quite a bit from official laser times.
.24 is what is considered the differerence.
A handtimed 100m in 10.0=10.24 electro
world class white hurdlers/NFLers Jerry Tarr and Richmond Flowers could have ran with anyone if there had been a combine back then. A lot of hurdlers actually superior to sprinters at a 40.
RGIII a 4.41 guy.
look out for brandin cooks... uva WR tbh
honestly the way the boards are shaking up, i would just get really pissed if we waste our pick on jake matthews
Sure, too much stock is put into the Combine but that 4.47 40-time by Clowney is out of this world. Houston needs a QB badly but a Clowney-Watt tandem is fapworthy
and today just confirmed how much I want us to draft Mack--but I doubt he falls to 9
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)