That isn't polite.
You should speak to us rather than in the mirror.
To remind those of you who fly off the handle without understanding all the facts...
This lawsuit is about the change in property value and noise, based on the water tower height and the constant truck traffic.
The fracking is not in the immediate area. This part of the operation is not mentioned in the lawsuit. If I am wrong, please show me. I have linked the lawsuit, so have at it.
"Furthermore, upon information and belief, BWSC will sell water to oil and gas explorers for frac[k]ing shale formations leading to traffic with heavy trucks on FM 407, creating a noise nuisance and traffic hazards."
Didn't I say traffic noise?
due to selling water to fracking operations?
I'm not here to argue with you though. I think it's pretty clear what their demands are, and the reasons behind them. You may construe them anyway you want.
Yes. The truck movements and taller tower changing the skyline. Not the fracking itself.
Do you understand the nuances?
You guys are the ones construing their purpose. I would say their complaint is concise enough.
Why are there truck movements and a water tower by a ranch? He bought a ranch to be next to truck noise and a water tower? Oh the water tower was already there for his ranch... No?
Are you rally that stupid?
Did I quote you? Was I talking to you?
You really shouldnt make assumptions like that. Sheesh.
Ask yourself that for an absolutely pitiful argument.
ALWAYS have a lawyer speak for you if you find yourself in legal trouble.
Line drive, 2nd baseman never saw it...
Man I hate it when you buy a nice place and huge trucks and water towers pop up in the middle of nowhere. And there is no damn explanation as to why they showed up...
Last edited by pgardn; 02-25-2014 at 10:18 AM.
It wasnt the car accident that killed him. It was "acute deceleration trauma". /WC
Last edited by TeyshaBlue; 02-25-2014 at 11:22 AM.
Exactly.
Cant muddy the water. It's difficult to juggle these nuances as he calls them.
No "I wonder" wishful thinking this time? Oh yeah, you just wish the world as you want it to be. You don't want the fracking mining process impinged so you try and separate the trucking from the rest. Thus, no supposition that the other criticisms of fracking might be valid. Have to only make up that fufulls your master's desires.
Good minion!
I think the whole thing is the very definition of irony.
Seriously. How can anyone reasonably conclude that this is anything BUT the height of hypocrisy?
Maybe you should quote or indicate who you are replying to. Maybe edit when it falls right after the wrong person.
You shouldn't go making assumptions like that. What if the deceleration was caused by a mosquito stuck in brake fluid compartment? smh lib .
Brake fluid? Maybe you should stop assuming I meant brake failure. Stop assuming nuances mean anything to me!
Lib ed-er!
Nazis! Cubans!Brake fluid? Maybe you should stop assuming I meant brake failure. Stopassum Ing nuances mean anything to me!
And stop ing quoting me before I fix my typos! Thanks Obama!
Vietcong!
You all have it wrong.
It's Bush's fault.
Really? That's your takeaway?
You think NIMBY is exclusive to the CEO of Exxon?
Do you have the moral honesty to admit that you are a NIMBY too?
I love electricity. I really do.
I'd be a mad mother er if they built a power plant right next to my house/ranch after they explicitly told me they wouldn't.
I understand that we need to assist the homeless somehow.
Would you have liked them to build the "Haven For The Hopeless" right next door to your home? Crazy drug addled mother ers harassing your children for money as they wait for the school bus?
Admit it. you are a NIMBY too.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
