Major discovery bolsters Big Bang theory of universe

[Sybok]

I guess you spend most of your days confused.
I don't communicate with them, I bash them.
It's all you idiots deserve.
Civil communication?
No way, not even close.
And I laugh AT, not WITH, you baffoons all a lot.

Anyone who can believe in a creation story has integrity issues with their own epistemology, is morally bankrupt, confused, capricious and devoid of anything resembling educated thought processes.

[xmas1997]

Anyone who can believe in a creation story has integrity issues with their own epistemology, is morally bankrupt, confused, capricious and devoid of anything resembling educated thought processes.

Why is it so hard for you to respect anothers' opinion, especially when they aren't trying to force you to believe the way they do?
I can see your point of view, but I don't see the point in making fun of it.
You make a lot of contentious accusations, but have little to back them up with.
And just so you know, not every Christian, not even most, feel the need to bash atheists or agnostics, nor do they feel the need to justify their beliefs.
It is what it is.
If you're just going to slam and spam ignorantly, then that is troll activity.

[Sybok]

Why is it so hard for you to respect anothers' opinion, especially when they aren't trying to force you to believe the way they do?
I can see your point of view, but I don't see the point in making fun of it.
You make a lot of contentious accusations, but have little to back them up with.
And just so you know, not every Christian, not even most, feel the need to bash atheists or agnostics, nor do they feel the need to justify their beliefs.
It is what it is.
If you're just going to slam and spam ignorantly, then that is troll activity.

Your opinion not only merits being laughed at and ridiculed, it demands it. No one of any real moral fiber can sit idly by while jerkoffs like you try to play the "agree to disagree" bit with your invisible friend in tow, as if the concept of creation by design isn't absolutely absurd at every level. I'm sure you'd like it if no one questioned your professed beliefs. Too bad.

The point in making fun of it is that it's as silly as believing in witchcraft or the abominable snowman, except the latter is at least plausible on some empirical scale.

Your arguments for creation aren't even made with compelling evidence, so no counter arguments are needed. I can just sit back and laugh at you.

I don't care what Christians feel the need to do. They are willing slaves for eternity to an overbearing conceptual deity that sanctions murder and rape, for the right reasons of course. Why should their opinions mean anything? If anything, they are cancers to society and should be treated as such.

Call it what you will, you simply have not nor can you show one s ch of reasoning for intelligent design (a euphemism for "god did it"). The fact that you rely on argument from ignorance is enough to support that assertion.

[TE]

>has no patience with trolls
>spends 99% of his day on ST talking to or complaining about them

tbh

[xmas1997]

Your opinion not only merits being laughed at and ridiculed, it demands it. No one of any real moral fiber can sit idly by while jerkoffs like you try to play the "agree to disagree" bit with your invisible friend in tow, as if the concept of creation by design isn't absolutely absurd at every level. I'm sure you'd like it if no one questioned your professed beliefs. Too bad.

The point in making fun of it is that it's as silly as believing in witchcraft or the abominable snowman, except the latter is at least plausible on some empirical scale.

Your arguments for creation aren't even made with compelling evidence, so no counter arguments are needed. I can just sit back and laugh at you.

I don't care what Christians feel the need to do. They are willing slaves for eternity to an overbearing conceptual deity that sanctions murder and rape, for the right reasons of course. Why should their opinions mean anything? If anything, they are cancers to society and should be treated as such.

Call it what you will, you simply have not nor can you show one s ch of reasoning for intelligent design (a euphemism for "god did it"). The fact that you rely on argument from ignorance is enough to support that assertion.

Well, at least it is an intelligent reply although smelling awfully trollish if you ask me.
From now on just talk to the hand.
You really didn't deserve a reply, but I graced you with all you're worth anyway.
There is no reasoning with narrow minded blind ignorant bigots anyway.
Yes, this aptly describes you to a T IMHO.
Too bad life has some hard lessons in store for you.
Enjoy, but beware.

[Sybok]

Well, at least it is an intelligent reply although smelling awfully trollish if you ask me.
From now on just talk to the hand.
You really didn't deserve a reply, but I graced you with all you're worth anyway.
There is no reasoning with narrow minded blind ignorant bigots anyway.
Yes, this aptly describes you to a T IMHO.
Too bad life has some hard lessons in store for you.
Enjoy, but beware.

k thx bye

[xmas1997]

k thx bye

Tell it to the hand, or can't you read?

[phyzik]

Science has never really proven the earth is even a Million years old and they have the nerve to put 4.6 Billion in the texts books?
insane .

Not proven, but the evidence overwhelmingly supports it...

Should we accept the overwhelming evidence for a world 4.6 billion years old, or should we trust in a book that is a collaboration of texts, many of which were discarded due to conflicting views, by men who lived 3500 years ago and weren't even present to corroborate those extraordinary events?

You can deny the evidence, close your eyes and plug your ears.... that does not negate the evidence though. Your opinion is your own, but your opinion doesn't trump evidence no matter how much you want it to.

[xmas1997]

Not proven, but the evidence overwhelmingly supports it...

Should we accept the overwhelming evidence for a world 4.6 billion years old, or should we trust in a book that is a collaboration of texts, many of which were discarded due to conflicting views, by men who lived 3500 years ago and weren't even present to collaborate those extraordinary events?

You can deny the evidence, close your eyes and plug your ears.... that does not negate the evidence though. Your opinion is your own, but your opinion doesn't trump evidence no matter how much you want it to.

This is true, can't deny the facts.

[mouse]

Not proven, but the evidence overwhelmingly supports it...

Post a link....

you see it's all Bull !

Should we accept the overwhelming evidence for a world 4.6 billion years old, or should we trust in a book that is a collaboration of texts, many of which were discarded due to conflicting views, by men who lived 3500 years ago and weren't even present to corroborate those extraordinary event?

isn't 't everything you ever thought was real just now collapse beneath you.

You can deny the evidence, close your eyes and plug your ears.... that does not negate the evidence though. Your opinion is your own, but your opinion doesn't trump evidence no matter how much you want it to.


Do you know anything about Science?

[Blake]

Post a link....

you see it's all Bull !

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...-of-the-earth/

[phyzik]

Thanks Blake,

That's just one of many articles.... what Mouse forgets is that I WORK for the Southwest Research Ins ute. I DO know "science" and evidence supports a 4.6 billion year old earth weather he likes it or not. I don't have to prove anything to him.... the proof has been out there for decades, all he needs to do is look and stop denying the evidence that is right in front of him. It is pretty much impossible to rationalize with someone who is dead set on an irrational belief to begin with though. I have long since put Mouse in the same category as the flat earth society group. He refuses to believe even with the evidence staring him right in the face. He only gets a response from me when it is for my amusement.

[RD2191]

Believing you evolved from a fish is rational. Rofl

[phyzik]

Believing you evolved from a fish is rational. Rofl

you obviously don't understand evolution. LOL.

[RD2191]

Yes I do. And I know that it's a lie. Evolution is impossible.

[phyzik]

Yes I do. And I know that it's a lie. Evolution is impossible.

ahhh... here we go... the hook.... OK, I'll bite.

Explain Dogs....

If you understood even the basic concept of Evolution, even as a religious nutbag, you couldn't deny it at all. You're just trying to troll.

[RD2191]

Anyone who can think knows that it's impossible. There are many reasons as to why.

[phyzik]

Anyone who can think knows that it's impossible. There are many reasons as to why.

again, explain Dogs.

You brought it up, disprove evolution. Here is your chance at a nobel prize.

Explain Dogs.

Im waiting.

[phyzik]

Anyone who can think knows that it's impossible. There are many reasons as to why.

Aside from you explaining Dogs, I would like to hear your "many reasons why" evolution is impossible...

Please elaborate for my enjoyment. I am sitting in my chair nonplussed waiting for your non-riveting reply that will obviously make all of us rational thinkers laugh.

[RD2191]

Waiting for what? There are many flaws in evolution. You refuse to even consider that it may be wrong because your entire life will have been a lie.

[TDMVPDPOY]

imagine a supreme being visiting earth

the catholics will try to brainwashed them god created them

the aliens will just flip out their s and ejaculate over our species lol wheres ur god..

[SnakeBoy]

again, explain Dogs.

You brought it up, disprove evolution. Here is your chance at a nobel prize.

Explain Dogs.

Im waiting.

Terrible evolution example tbh. The slippery nature of the canine genome that allows a wolf to become a Chihuahua is well understood. It's also well understood by science that this genetic process cannot lead to a dog to becoming a bear or raccoon.

[phyzik]

Waiting for what? There are many flaws in evolution. You refuse to even consider that it may be wrong because your entire life will have been a lie.

Wrong... provide peer reviewed proof and I will gladly concede a point. I have no problem being wrong when provided proof otherwise....

now, lets proceed and quit avoiding the task at hand.....

Explain Dogs Please.

[phyzik]

Terrible evolution example tbh. The slippery nature of the canine genome that allows a wolf to become a Chihuahua is well understood. It's also well understood by science that this genetic process cannot lead to a dog to becoming a bear or raccoon.

Umm... You just explained evolution..... A Dog cannot become a cat.... a Monkey cannot become a tiger...... Thanks for proving my point.

All dog species originated from the Grey Wolf. This is FACT. It was Humans who bred the characteristics into the "Dogs" over 150,000 years to create what was optimal for their needs.... OF COURSE you wouldn't have a wolf give birth to a Chihuahua.... It took THOUSANDS of years to create all the breeds we have today..... The simple fact remains that ALL DOG BREEDS came from Grey Wolves.

[RD2191]

You will never admit to being wrong. Evolution is impossible. It's simple really. How can you honestly believe that you evolved from a fish? Is there any evidence of this? Besides the very little transitional fossils available. Most of which have been doctored.