ESPN Video: Championship or Bust for Spurs

[BillMc]

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=10671667

A video where Jermele Hill (or however she spells her name) basically implies the Spurs are under-achievers. She says something like "they get to the playoffs and fall short" every year, like we're the old Atlanta Braves or something. None of this is new...

What is news? Well, according to the images behind them George Hill has returned to the Spurs! Go Georgie!

[SpurSwag]

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=10671667

A video where Jermele Hill (or however she spells her name) basically implies the Spurs are under-achievers. She says something like "they get to the playoffs and fall short" every year, like we're the old Atlanta Braves or something. None of this is new...

What is news? Well, according to the images behind them George Hill has returned to the Spurs! Go Georgie!

i started watching that video and stopped about a minute in when she was saying that crap about how its like the same movie over and over and we always fall short in the playoffs.

Also the video lost all merit with the poster of George Hill in a spurs jersey 3 years after he left

[atoyotagaspedal]

I saw a picture of George Hill in the background and then closed it, ESPN is such a ing joke

[Bartleby]

She's a consistent Spurs hater (and a remarkably clueless one at that). I'm pretty sure there are threads about her disses on the Spurs from about this time last year, and probably the year before that.

[BillMc]

She's a consistent Spurs hater (and a remarkably clueless one at that). I'm pretty sure there are threads about her disses on the Spurs from about this time last year, and probably the year before that.

Yes. Her old act used to be the Spurs aren't good enough. Her new angle (this year and last year) is that we're loaded with talent and choking it all away. This and the premise that we've been good so long makes us uninteresting, and not worth discussing. Our achievements used against us.

[Spur|n|Austin]

A native of Detroit, Hill attended Mumford High School and graduated from Michigan State University with a degree in journalism and a minor in Spanish.

Her saltiness from the 2005 championship is obviously still strong. She's also ugly.

[poeticism707]

Yes. Her old act used to be the Spurs aren't good enough. Her new angle (this year and last year) is that we're loaded with talent and choking it all away....

This.

Which is why women have no business reffing, broadcasting, or discussing on tv, men's sports.

Men are logical. Their arugments are logcial.

Women are emotionally dependant children, who like to dress up in logical clothes; but their emotions are the real fuel for their fire, and not simple facts/evdience.
As such, they makes stupud claims based on emotion, and parade it around like it's fact, then scream sexual discrimination when any man of average intelligence sees through their swiss cheese arguments.

"Ms. Hill" (obviously not married, who'd put up with her) is the cheer captain of this team.

[siraulo23]

so the spurs are now underachievers lol, i ignore most of the espn articles/vids but this is just plain obvious spurs hate it's ridiculous

ive stopped watching espn nba related vids tbh, i have no idea why their articles still get posted here, but when they do i ways click lol, so please stop posting them

[Mel_13]

Jermele Hill. That's enough information.

No reason to watch the video.

[Old School 44]

ESPN just playing the point/counter-point game. It's just trolling on video. They do it with Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless, with Bruce Bowen and Israel Guiterrez. Most media outlets play this same game to some degree.

[Two10Whitey]

LMAO George Hill in the background. Talk about fail.

[Budkin]

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=10671667

A video where Jermele Hill (or however she spells her name) basically implies the Spurs are under-achievers. She says something like "they get to the playoffs and fall short" every year, like we're the old Atlanta Braves or something. None of this is new...

What is news? Well, according to the images behind them George Hill has returned to the Spurs! Go Georgie!

4 rings but we "fall short every year." that .

[ohmwrecker]

She's a re .

[RD2191]

That stupid always talks , probably a Lakers fan. ing needs to get slapped.

[RD2191]

Grapenutz is a got. I know you're reading this you piece of .

[Leetonidas]

Jemele Hill

People are re ed. Lakers and Celtics have 33 les between them. Outside of them, it's Chicago with 6 (courtesy of the GOAT), San Antonio with 4, and Miami with 3. So we're underachievers after netting 4 rings when at the beginning of the last decade only a couple teams outside of LA/Boston/Chicago even had a LOB? Dumb

[RD2191]

Jemele Hill

People are re ed. Lakers and Celtics have 33 les between them. Outside of them, it's Chicago with 6 (courtesy of the GOAT), San Antonio with 4, and Miami with 3. So we're underachievers after netting 4 rings when at the beginning of the last decade only a couple teams outside of LA/Boston/Chicago even had a LOB? Dumb

drop some truff bombs on that hoe, you should tweet dat

[Bill_Brasky]

This.

Which is why women have no business reffing, broadcasting, or discussing on tv, men's sports.

Men are logical. Their arugments are logcial.

Women are emotionally dependant children, who like to dress up in logical clothes; but their emotions are the real fuel for their fire, and not simple facts/evdience.
As such, they makes stupud claims based on emotion, and parade it around like it's fact, then scream sexual discrimination when any man of average intelligence sees through their swiss cheese arguments.

"Ms. Hill" (obviously not married, who'd put up with her) is the cheer captain of this team.

[Leetonidas]

drop some truff bombs on that hoe, you should tweet dat

I don't have a twitter...

[RD2191]

I don't have a twitter...

neither do I, damn

[Spurs 4 The Win]

Jamelle Hill or whatever that fugly chicks name is, makes me change the channel every time she opens her mouth. She knows literally nothing.

I had the displeasure of seeing a segment with her and Michael Smith (also clueless but not as bad). They asked if they were worried about the Heat possibly not making the Finals. Jemele starts and says no because they have no threats in the Western conference or Eastern conference and that LeBron can beat everyone. Michael Smith countered and said what about the Spurs, they shouldve won last year and look much better this year compared to the Heat, especially after beating them badly last time they met. This dumb says "Spurs!!! They cant handle the Heat, last year was a fluke, they always choke when it matters, i will be surprised if they even make the WCF" I turned off the TV and vowed to never here that chick speak again.

[RD2191]

Someone needs to troll that on twitter.

[Juggity]

This.

Which is why women have no business reffing, broadcasting, or discussing on tv, men's sports.

Men are logical. Their arugments are logcial.

Women are emotionally dependant children, who like to dress up in logical clothes; but their emotions are the real fuel for their fire, and not simple facts/evdience.
As such, they makes stupud claims based on emotion, and parade it around like it's fact, then scream sexual discrimination when any man of average intelligence sees through their swiss cheese arguments.

"Ms. Hill" (obviously not married, who'd put up with her) is the cheer captain of this team.

What a bizarre and sexist take. Jemele Hill is not a representative for all of womankind. She's an ESPN commentator who is told to find a consistent, controversial angle to stir discussion and emotion. She's a female Stephen A. Smith, hired to generate an emotional response in viewers, either for or against. I doubt she believes a single word of her arguments. Or if she does, then it is to a much less radical extent.

[BillMc]

She's an ESPN commentator who is told to find a consistent, controversial angle to stir discussion and emotion. She's a female Stephen A. Smith, hired to generate an emotional response in viewers, either for or against. I doubt she believes a single word of her arguments. Or if she does, then it is to a much less radical extent.

Sadly, you're right. We're in an age of sports commentator "sensationalism" rather than journalism, where those who say the most outrageous things get the internet hits, etc. Intelligent, well-thought through sports journalism is fading fast.

[poeticism707]

What a bizarre and sexist take. Jemele Hill is not a representative for all of womankind. She's an ESPN commentator who is told to find a consistent, controversial angle to stir discussion and emotion. She's a female Stephen A. Smith, hired to generate an emotional response in viewers, either for or against. I doubt she believes a single word of her arguments. Or if she does, then it is to a much less radical extent.

Be a man, actually open your eyes to the "victim" status women greedily lap up like insatiable dogs, then in about 20 years when life has taught you hard lessons about women and their endless excusses, pity parties, always avoiding responsibility, using men when necesarry, and then disposing of them like toiletries when it's convenient, etc.

Only then can we speak of such things.

But not now. Your naivete just blinds you.