The Count is a doorstop & paper weight when alpha rings vs. role player rings isn't figured in, but you still cite it because it favors your Kirby.
It's chicken .
I like to see why Kobe didn't deserve his. And you better use eFG% or TS% at least over FG% so you don't look like a .
Duncan : 3
Kobe : 2
And it roasts Thread's ass to think about it. He knows that the true measure of individual success can never belong to a rapist.
Duncan : 3
Kobe : 2
/Thread.
The fact still remains that Duncan won the finals MVP. And lets be honest.. he was the best player on our team that year.
Finals MVPs are paper weights now
Why do you think your Kirby wanted Shaq gone so bad?
You can dish it, but you are sure as can't take it.
Duncan : 3
Kobe : 2
/Thread.
Last edited by Gummi Clutch; 03-29-2014 at 01:30 AM.
So leading the league in rebounding is meaningless? Christ!
Whatever. Couldn't do it in the playoffs either tbh.
Whats the greatest award to be had in the game? To be the a finals MVP. Thats what we use to measure Jordan as GOAT. The chicken is scared that Duncan > Kobe and is going to detract as much as possible.
Can't admit Duncan >> Kobe so the chicken has to change the rules of the game.![]()
God damn Piano shot a godly 38 % from the field. And Dude took 25 shots a game to hero ball his way to a Finals MVP (from Daddy). Sadly the Pistons had other ideas.
Yup.
Duncan : 3
Kobe : 2
And Kobe is set in stone.
Yes. Because it doesn't prove anything.
Allen Iverson has 2 more scoring les than Kirby. So?
A host of factors can go into affecting per game stats. Pace. System. Rotation. Minutes.
And citing "playoff per game" les is probably one of the most re ed things you've ever done. A player could pad his stats on a bad team in the 1st round in a losing effort (like T-Mac in Orlando) and wind up with a "per game" le over a player who made a Finals run.
did you know kirby is a quitter? a repeat offender.
Doesn't matter what he is.
Duncan >>>> Kobe.
That DoK was the first to predict it tbh...
Since when has the biggest honor in the game, of which Duncan sports 3 I may add...been analogous to a paper weight?
When it doesn't suite your point, change the laws of nature and ..basketball for that matter. Works for some posters I guess.![]()
The numbers don't lie.
Duncan: 3
Kobe : 2
of course, to thread, kirby's 2 finals mvps aren't paper weights. however, duncan's 3 finals mvps are.
intriguing.
The sign of a broken and disgruntled man. Duncan >>> Kobe and he can't stomach it. Its a constipating that is churning all the way up his mouth and he can't decide whether or not to enjoy the taste.
They don't. Duncan bests Kobe in nearly every playoff advanced category there is. From PER to Defensive Rating to even Deuce's precious TS%. He also bests Kobe in nearly every important traditional stat, aside from PPG (which he's only 3 points behind the "greatest scorer evar!") and assists. Duncan is even more clutch.
Sample from the 1st two rounds of the 2003-4 playoffs:
And their respective clutch stats since 00':
This is why Kobe fans default to rings. They have no other argument.
I don't think it takes more than the eye test to come to that conclusion. If you want to compare legacies it boils down to:
Duncan : 3
Kobe : 2
Notice how when thats brought up, that chicken Thread is nowhere to be found and calls it a "paper weight"
MELTDOWN![]()
Threads is say paper weight = Final MVP ?:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)