Reply With Quote
How many should you deduct if your wife slept with another man?
10 being a Sean Elliott and 1 being a chazley or sbm.
Be sure to deduct a point if you're grey.
Deduct 2 if you're a mavs fan because 4>1.
Deduct 3 if you have calf tats or if you think Diaw>Lee
Deduct 9 if you're an Aggie or you're an lolutsa nut job.
How many should you deduct if your wife slept with another man?
How many do you deduct for refusing to believe that Pop is a complete and utter moron whose teams win despite him?
I have a feeling this is somehow all going to come back around to Tony Parker hating.
wow, that guy can dribble, dribble, dribble
8/10 for me.
I don't have league pass but outside of every Spurs game I watch every game on ESPN, TNT, and NBAtv. I just like going on the journey with the teams so I can feel something come playoff time outside of my team winning or losing. I could probably name every starter for every team and tell you where they went to college etc. I feel like I know where each team stands talent-wise and whether they realistically can compete with another team in a playoff series.
It's fun when you dive in something rather than being just a casual observer.
Diaw > Lee. Is it even in doubt anymore? It was true two years ago too. Now it's more obvious so now the unknowledgable fans can even see it.
I'm around a 10.
None if you ditch her immediately.
-10 for believing the Bible is real.
+3 if you hate Tony Parker like me
OP, weren't you the guy made the "I can't be the only one who hates when Tony dribble dribble dribble..." Thread?
Just because you're bold doesn't change the fact that your takes are garbage.
Obvious troll is obvious
0/10
-11 if you don't think Manu cost us the 2013 Championship
-3 for being a butthurt gray
Very few people who actually know the game of Basketball, I am not one of them. Cry Havoc, TE, Chinook, ElNono, are all 10s. Cod21 or something like that also knows a lot about the game. I'm sure I'm forgetting a few more.
I ask, what is knowledge and how can it be assessed? Are we speaking relativistically? Then I am the most knowledgable of every person I have ever talked to about the NBA. Does that make me a 9, because I am a lowly GNSF? I would say decidedly not, for many basketball geniuses exist (in here and in other places) as well as those whom are able to become knowledgable by watching many more games! Where, then, must I exist?
Derrida would say that quantifying the opaque qualitative is intellectually impossible and Lacan would say that my developmental lens is linguistically fractured.
Zizek would say that ethical principle is bound not by the historical materialism of dialecticalism, but rather dialectical obstruction to arrogantly founded fractured linguistic structures.
I refuse to comment, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers
Last edited by iManu; 04-01-2014 at 09:23 PM.
Enough that the casual fan thinks I'm a nerd.
3.14159
I go to 11. I'm one smarter than Sean.
A downstairs thread that crawled up out of the mud like that tadpole in Cosmos.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
