Reply With Quote
But he tried to finger Kobe´s wife ring that must be something.
Malone didnt ring
But he tried to finger Kobe´s wife ring that must be something.
Disagree - if you're a contender 5 years in a row, that means a lot.
By that logic, the 2013 Spurs would be equal to the 97 Spurs because they both "didn't get it done." It's a false dichotomy.
Notice the didn't quote the second part of my post ^
a) ?
b) i didn't need to. after a moronic statement like that, anything after that is just blablablabla
seriously though. first of all, i've made my nationality publicly known tbh, so if u want to use nationality as a diss, at least get it right
secondly, annoucning somebody's nationality isn't a diss. calling harlem canadian isn't a diss. calling me chinese (which is just wrong) isn't a diss.
being a contender is one thing. sayingthey should have won those years
As if coaching great talent automatically disqualifies someone from being considered a great coach. Obviously great talent is the main ingredient in championship teams (with the odd exception, such as the '04 Pistons), so a coach can almost never win without it, but it's not as simple as that. If it were, the Lakers would have won it in '04 and the Heat in '11.
Despite his history, I don't really see this as a shot at the Spurs, so much as it is an antiquated mindset. Professional sports are a lot different today than they were 10-20 years ago, from the constant turnover in personnel to the immense scrutiny, etc. In this day and age, 3 championships and sustained excellence for the better part of a decade cons utes a dynasty and the fact that the Spurs have eclipsed both thresholds easily makes them that. You'll see a team go back-to-back many times over before you see a comparable to them.
There's not been a dynasty since the Chinese ones way back when Culburn was a pup. Not counting the sand crickets.
That Phil Jackson coaching tree speaks volumes.
Good old Phil think like most fans. If you dont win consecutive les=default on it not being a dynasty.
You dont domininate and win 4 championship in a 10 year span and not call it a dynasty franchise. At least with the Duncan era for sure.
Just Phil being Phil. Nothing new.
I have never ever liked the man.
Phillip upset about his weight gain tbh.
He's making 12 mil/yr and bangin' an ex-Playboy model who owns half of the Lakers,,,,,life is good for him.
Phillip needs to add some squats and deadlifts to his routine. That should help balance out his abdominal and chest gains.
just like laker fan
3 les in 4 years. There's no arguing tbh.
The last two of those don't belong when talking about his successes (well, Payton did win with Miami a few years later). Actually, pretty embarrassing that team couldn't win more than a game against a relatively unheralded Pistons team.
LOL. Who is Phil Jackson?
I'm going to have to take your first answer on that one Phil.
Because I really give a what Phil Jackson thinks about San Antonio.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
