Spurs Record After Winning Game 1's in the Tim Duncan Era

[lil'mo]

Just the numbers...not a prediction of any sort.

Your comment doesn't even make sense..."applicability of these stats in predicting future outcomes are based on assumptions that aren't fulfilled." What is that?

The Spurs won game 1...that's the only "assumption that's fulfilled." You sound like a re .

My advice to you would be to say "we can't predict the future based on past history." At least then you wouldn't sound like an idiot.

[100%duncan]

They may have won 1 but we lost the 6.

[jARS mEsH sEt]

Let's start a new stat. What's the spurs record after jars mesh set calls lil'mo a got. Stay tuned

[lil'mo]

Statistics is a ing joke. It's a practice of making up numbers to say anything you want them to. :Rollin

Fake math

[KaiRMD1]

I thought we always lost a series after losing game 3

[jARS mEsH sEt]

I thought we always lost a series after losing game 3

So which stat/trend was applicable against dallas? The one that says we win 90%+ of our series after winning game 1, or the one that says we lose 90% of our series after losing game 3?

[jARS mEsH sEt]

(That's a rhetorical question)

[TheRemix]

Advanced stats have shown that when the spurs win 4 games they always win the series

[KaiRMD1]

(That's a rhetorical question)

Stats are useless,

[jag]

Statistics is a ing joke. It's a practice of making up numbers to say anything you want them to. :Rollin

Fake math

Jars is probably re ed. But anyone who says statistics is a joke, because he isn't smart enough to grasp statistics, is equally re ed.

[SpurAddict561]

FOUR RINGS GOT

[cjw]

The last game 1 loss was the friggen Grizzlies? How spoiled we are...

[Fireball]

it ... we lost against OKC being up 2-0 and against Miami having a 1-0 ...

[Cowboys_Wear_Spurs]

These stats are completely useless because the applicability of these stats in predicting future outcomes are based on assumptions that aren't fulfilled.

They actually come into play as how well the Spurs as a unit close out series and hang on to series leads. But I think the main factor is Duncan and Co. are no spring chickens anymore. But Kawhi, Splitter, Green, Beli, Mills, now Baynes kinda negate the age factor a bit for the Spurs.

[lil'mo]

Jars is probably re ed. But anyone who says statistics is a joke, because he isn't smart enough to grasp statistics, is equally re ed.

Because I have a grasp on statistics, I know they are a ing joke

Hey I can take any set of random data I want to make any argument I want!

[Al Koholik]

Because I have a grasp on statistics, I know they are a ing joke

Hey I can take any set of random data I want to make any argument I want!

Becaush I took a stats class once. Shutda up. Stupid full of themself youngsters.

[Spur|n|Austin]

Just the numbers...not a prediction of any sort.

Your comment doesn't even make sense..."applicability of these stats in predicting future outcomes are based on assumptions that aren't fulfilled." What is that?

The Spurs won game 1...that's the only "assumption that's fulfilled." You sound like a re .

My advice to you would be to say "we can't predict the future based on past history." At least then you wouldn't sound like an idiot.

He's not even sure what he's saying sometimes..

[jARS mEsH sEt]

Jars is probably re ed. But anyone who says statistics is a joke, because he isn't smart enough to grasp statistics, is equally re ed.

Jag with the usual high horse bull without contributing anything meaningful to the thread. How does it feel to be a non-contributing zero?

[jARS mEsH sEt]

He's not even sure what he's saying sometimes..

so... ing...mad. I love it.

[Spur|n|Austin]

Mad at? I think it's fun watching you troll around here with takes.

[Skull-1]

We got a black hawk down, we got a black hawk down! Super 61 is down. We got a bird down in the city!!

"Shughart and Gordon requesting permission to go in and secure the crash site."

[Skull-1]

The Spurs have won 29 opening games in playoff series since Tim Duncan's arrival. Of those 29 series with game 1 victories they've gone on to win the series a total of 25 times (86%). However, their record in games 2s after a game 1 win is only 20-9, so based on that 86% series winning percentage it would appear that the Spurs let off the gas a bit in game 2 winning only 69% of those games.

If the Spurs go up 2-0, they own a 18-2 record in those series in the Duncan era (90%).

totally irrelevant since every variable has changed except for Pop and Tim. They have changed, too. Gotten older. So forecasting is impossible.