No, the question is what did OKC to deserve 20 in ONE ing quarter.
The Spurs are in trouble tbh. Hopefully they come out with a better effort in Game 4 because they lost this game on the glass.
No, the question is what did OKC to deserve 20 in ONE ing quarter.
Bonner +8 king of the +/- lives on![]()
You think the schedule was created to help Ibaka back in the lineup? Miami/Indiana had 3 days off as well. That's insane to say.
Monkeyball and Chimpball get a game.
That horse call on Mills should have been reviewed. They were hanging around until then. Asshole officials. This will likely be a long series now. Too bad.
This tbh.
actually wouldn't be a terrible idea to play Bonner some of Baynes minutes. Have him guard Adams or Butler even.
Spurs hung in longer than I thought. It's a brand new series, and the Spurs are gonna have to rise to the occasion. TP, Kawhi, and a lot of people outside of Manu were MIA tonight. They'll have to play better to have a chance at winning game 4.....
I would say they didn't deserve about 6 free throws on ticky tack fouls called away from the rim. The rest were legit. Six of those free throws came from intentional fouls on Adams. And unlike the Spurs the OKC players were going to the rim and putting pressure on the defense. And it would have helped if someone on San Antonio wanted to rebound rather than give more scoring opportunities for an aggressive OKC offense.
I agree. So what's the problem? I don't understand what your point is.
The only good thing to take from this game is that the Spurs sucked in every category - so there's tons of room for improvement. Plus, Timmy, Manu and Tony are so compe ive, and they're going to probably not sleep much tonight because of replaying every ghastly minute of that horrible game. So, hopefully, they will come out with more energy and intensity for game 4. It's like they expected to lose this game, and just let OKC have it because of the Ibaka resurrection.
Do we let Amused start the Game 4 thread?![]()
Exactly what I've been saying about TP. I feel that I am a better 3 point shooter than TP, which is not a ing good thing at all. I really believe that if they developed a somewhat consistent 3 point shot with him it would have made a huge difference to his game. I don't have access to one of the best shooting coaches in the world like TP does, so I just find it negligent that the Spurs have never made it a top priority for him to have a somewhat consistent 3 point shot as a part of his game by now. He doesn't have to be a lights out shooter, but if he could have started taking 3-4 of those shots each game and shooting around 37%-38% from 3 point range, I think it would have helped him become a more versatile, unguardable player that could perform better in all these same games and situations he seems to fail in (Athletic shot blockers/long defenders). Back in 2006, I thought that by 2009-2010 he'd have that in his arsenal and be shooting them as a regular part of his game.
Trying to take midrange jumpers, and jumpers close to the rim when the other team has athletic shot blockers, or just long athletes around the rim in general is not a good shot IMO. His percentage goes right down against those teams. A three point shot would have been better to be able to get cleaner looks off, and then if that shot was going in for him, it would open up the rest of the game for him to go inside more.
Last edited by Ice009; 05-25-2014 at 10:23 PM.
That attention will take the liberty to do it anyways regardless of what you think, tbh![]()
kawhi is getting off easy. he stunk it up tonight too. his jumper wasn't falling, took some bad shots and wasn't aggressive enough at attacking the rim. i know parker turned into ray charles and wasn't looking at getting everybody involved, but he still needs to be assertive and demand some touches. he's not a rookie anymore. closed mouth don't get fed.
mouse poaching this thread for post-loss spurfan tears per par![]()
Pop indirectly just said the team was soft tonight.
This was so predictable that nearly half the talking heads didn't even see it coming. That was also predictable.
Are we just ignoring 2007 because it's convenient?
Soft? - the Stay Puffed Marshmallow Man was tougher than the Spurs tonight!![]()
Pop just said Manu is out for the rest of the playoffs and told reporters to let presti know, lol.
Duncan was still the MVP that year.
Just that Parker had a better match up in the Cleveland series.
As soon as I saw the BONUS flicker on at the bottom of the TV with 7+ minutes left in the third, I knew we were in for it.
Need to get Ibaka into pick and rolls in game 4 and test that hammy early, and also get him away from the rim.
That dumbass played over the summer, but then again in some series he routinely will dissapear on you so I agree there. He has been that way since a rook. I agree Spurs will be in trouble as well if they lose game 4 and this continues, being up 2-0 is cool but then after getting whipped in game 3 you have to get back to business and focused.
So if he has a bad matchup it counts, but if he has a favorable matchup it doesn't? Got it. I thought that le counted, as well as the Finals MVP.
I keep forgetting Duncan had such an unfavorable matchup with Z's corpse and Varajao
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)