Reply With Quote
You mean Tim 3, Kobe 2.And it's STILL Kobe 5, Jim 2.
Finals MVPs are an individual award and should be used when comparing two players.
Rings are a team accomplishment, and the Lakers do in fact have 5 to the Spurs 4 in this era, unfortunately.
True or False: if OKC were healthy, do you guys make it past them this year or last?
You mean Tim 3, Kobe 2.And it's STILL Kobe 5, Jim 2.
Finals MVPs are an individual award and should be used when comparing two players.
Rings are a team accomplishment, and the Lakers do in fact have 5 to the Spurs 4 in this era, unfortunately.
ZERO bronze medalsPERIOD. Repeated as champion at least oncePERIOD.
what's the 5 and 2?And it's STILL Kobe 5, Jim 2.
Ibaka was jumping around like the ape he is in games 5 and 6 and it made zero difference. OKC got blown out just the same in game 5 and lost to the Spurs for the first time in two years on their home court in game 6, with Tim wrecking Ibaka's in OT. You also forget we played the majority of that game without Parker.
The evidence supports him making no difference.
FMVPs are (white) media awards. Ever since Colorado...you know the rest.
Unless you value MVPs over rangs, your argument holds no weight. I mean, the goal is to win championships. That's why they play (besides the s they can buy with all that cash
Um, Kobe won his only FMVPs after Colorado.FMVPs are (white) media awards. Ever since Colorado...you know the rest.
Unless you value MVPs over rangs, your argument holds no weight. I mean, the goal is to win championships. That's why they play (besides the s they can buy with all that cash
And of course the goal is to win les, which is why you compare teams and not players. It takes a team to win a le.
[QUOTE=midnightpulp;7405791]Ibaka was jumping around like the ape he is in games 5 and 6 and it made zero difference. OKC got blown out just the same in game 5 and lost to the Spurs for the first time in two years on their home court in game 6, with Tim wrecking Ibaka's in OT. You also forget we played the majority of that game without Parker.
The evidence supports him making no difference.[/QUOTE]
1) They spotted you guys two games
2) Tim played a 68% Ibaka (at best).
3) Did not Ibaka shoot 100% against Jim when healthy at least once?
4) Doesn't Chuckbrook dominate Enrique - when healthy? So Enrique being out is no factor.
2013 WC Champs *
2014 WC Champs *
Even Bird said Kobe deserved more than one mvp. As far as FMVP, who cares?
Yeah, but Duncan ed up your 5th all by himself.
Yeah, you're really spinning.
Proof OKC wins any of the first two games with a healthy Ibaka?
That's right, you have none.
this clown still trying to claim credit of vanessa 2.5 rings as his for total of 5rings?
Bronze Medal and (HOFer patent-pending) back to back Finals losses = deduction in rang totals.
Duncan was excellent in the Finals. The series wasn't lost on that missed layup.Even Bird said Kobe deserved more than one mvp. As far as FMVP, who cares?
Yeah, but Duncan ed up your 5th all by himself.
Now this is how you singlehandedly lose a Finals:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...html#LAL::none
4-23 from downtown
So Kobe obviously did care about the FMVP. He chucked the Lakers out of a le trying to win one
Despite what you are posting, you were one of the 1,000s of Spur Fans that wanted no parts of OKC. Admit it sYeah, you're really spinning.
Proof OKC wins any of the first two games with a healthy Ibaka?
That's right, you have none.
Oh, and out rebounded by Derek Fisher, in the ing FinalsDuncan was excellent in the Finals. The series wasn't lost on that missed layup.
Now this is how you singlehandedly lose a Finals:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...html#LAL::none
4-23 from downtown
So Kobe obviously did care about the FMVP. He chucked the Lakers out of a le trying to win one.
2004 Pistons and 2008 Cs are two of the greatest defensive teams in NBA history. Their perimeter and interior defenses were elite. OTOH, Jim faced Bosh e and Turdman. Big difference son.Duncan was excellent in the Finals. The series wasn't lost on that missed layup.
Now this is how you singlehandedly lose a Finals:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...html#LAL::none
4-23 from downtown
So Kobe obviously did care about the FMVP. He chucked the Lakers out of a le trying to win one
Reeeeeeaching son. Must be mad. tee heeOh, and out rebounded by Derek Fisher, in the ing Finals
Manu had no problem shooting over 45% against that same team the very next year. He also had no problem getting over 5 boards.
Keep
Kirby blew that Finals in a vain pursuit for the FMVP. Everyone knows this.
Manu > Kobe. Got it.Manu had no problem shooting over 45% against that same team the very next year. He also had no problem getting over 5 boards.
Keep
Kirby blew that Finals in a vain pursuit for the FMVP. Everyone knows this.
Glad you're listening to reason.Manu > Kobe. Got it.
Although Manu singlehandedly blew a Finals as well, so I guess they're even.
Kirby's averages from the 2004 finals:
2004: 22.6 ppg, 4.4 apg, 2.8 rpg, 1.8 steals, .6 blocks, 3.6 turnovers, 38% shooting
Shaq's averages from the 2004 finals:
2004: 26.6 ppg, 10.8 rpg, 1.6 apg, .6 blocks, 63.1% shooting, 49% FT
Looking forward to how Renato tries to
Watched NBA TV's special on the 1984 draft yesterday
Glad they had a segment on Oscar Schmidt too; destroyed Murica
Your wish is my command son. After The Split! Kobe 2 Snaq 1Kirby's averages from the 2004 finals:
2004: 22.6 ppg, 4.4 apg, 2.8 rpg, 1.8 steals, .6 blocks, 3.6 turnovers, 38% shooting
Shaq's averages from the 2004 finals:
2004: 26.6 ppg, 10.8 rpg, 1.6 apg, .6 blocks, 63.1% shooting, 49% FT
Looking forward to how Renato tries to
fifyYour wish is my command son. After The Split! MVPau 2 Daddy 1
So predictable. Kinda like a 2nd round Clipper l
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
