speaking of fluke... dude was playing for one of the worst french league team and sucked bad![]()
you're right.
The beaaner teams can press excellently and they are technical enough not to lose the ball after 3 passes (england) so they are usually good against tiki taka sides.
speaking of fluke... dude was playing for one of the worst french league team and sucked bad![]()
running that much costs energy...

No, but if Australia wins this game, it would make things really tough on Spain.
Nah, Ajaccio sucked but not him. His dream was to play in Europe so he left a big club like America and the Estadio Azteca to play for a small team in France which is pretty admirable imo. Heard Marseille is interested in him but not sure if he'll end up there tbh.
Well there goes that

Maybe they are running out of the stockpiled blood bottles after all these years since that scandal in 2006 and should ask the Spanish justice to free Mr. Fuentes![]()
Australia is ed without Cahill against Spain.
If you want Spain out then Holland has to win, if they lose that gives Spain more wiggle room.
Well, it depends on what Chile does.
Outside of goals that was really boring, no team feels like running in that heat.
Yes it depends on chile but you said if Australia wins it makes it tough on Spain but its the opposite- if Aussies win they have 3 along with Holland, but if they lose Holland has 6 and Spain has to win out just to tie Holland. If Australia wins Spain can still finish first
I can see this group chile holland and Spain all finishing with 6 pts and goal difference being the clincher
notsureifserious.jpg
His team sucked, he didn't..
Van Persie is not playing against Chile? That's pretty big.
Holland are such choke artists , unbelievable... In a group where 2nd is almost guaranteed to face Brazil they are setting themselves up for failure
Terrible penalty call, same one that screwed chile in 98
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)