If I am wrong about you, then I apologize. I figured you were jumping on the chump/blake troll bandwagon.Please show me where I distorted anything. Direct quote. If I did I'll man up and admit that, without feeling the need to call you a got. That's how real men resolve differences. If you say sorry to someone while laughing at them, it tends to seem ingenuous. But maybe that's just me.
I'm just basing that off the fact that you're calling everyone in this thread a troll except for SBM and yourself.
Cool. Thanks for the knowledge. I haven't been on the internet long so I'm not sure what a troll is, but I'm pretty sure you just described SBM to a T.
Yeah. I typically don't continue to belittle people when I disagree with them after I apologize to them for being wrong. Beating a dead horse at this point. Do you or do you not see how ridiculous that is?
You are the one who seems to care about the troll label. I don't, couldn't, won't.
Again, not my concern.
And your position is that if I share a single basketball take with them, it automatically makes me a troll? That's a terrible opinion.
But if you read my posts then you should have seen that I am not a troll either.
If you had the reading comprehension of a 2nd grader, you'd know it wasn't me or CD that started the trolling in this thread. You're bashing GreatYacht for calling people "manu s" but aren't saying a word about sbm calling people "popsuckers".
"manu " and "popsuckers" is the exact same cut down.
Ftr, I've had my share of disagreements with Cry Havoc over the years. The trick is that you don't take the zingers personal and you move on.
Some of us take this place waaay too seriously.
If you're not a troll, then you might be the least intelligent human on this board.
Bottom ten any way.
Smh Dartmouth.
but of course
If I am wrong about you, then I apologize. I figured you were jumping on the chump/blake troll bandwagon.
So says the troll, and trolls lie constantly, so these posts are no different.
And anyone notice the baiting trollish wisecracks?
As if he had any room to talk about "tricks" and the like.
Let me break it down for you in the simplest terms since you obviously need to go back and get your GED, troll, if you treat others civilly and respectfully, as you would have them treat you, then you would have no problems with me or anyone else on here except for the trolls.
Nor would your "history" of troll posts indict you so clearly.
It is NOT a matter of taking things seriously or not, rather it is a matter of doing what your parents obviously failed to teach you as a child, and that is having respect for others and being civil versus being a troll.
You would LIKE to make it a matter of "taking things too serious", but you can do that respectfully and civilly, or you can be what you are, a troll.
As I said, it is not rocket science.
This should finally put this part to bed so we can get back to the topic, "Pop".
The topic is "popsuckers". It says so right there in the le of this troll thread.
your reading comprehension completely blows.
smh Dartmouth.
And it is about Pop, nitwit!
throwing out false invectives all the time
As I said before and the proof is in the pudding, he started this .
See? You taking his, an obvious troll for years, side pretty much makes you a troll too, guilty by association.
Like a manu thread is about Manu
Duh!
You have no room whatsoever to accuse others of poor reading comprehension.
If you can't figure out what the "common themes" are in those two threads, Manu and Pop respectively, then you really need that GED pretty badly!
Last edited by xmas1997; 06-19-2014 at 03:38 PM.
No you haven't
So you can just throw labels around until one of them sticks in your opinion, but you aren't a troll? That's weak, dude. I mean seriously. You get to be the judge and jury but you get really incensed when someone else starts using aggressive adjectives.
Don't even bother reasoning with that clown..... in his mind, because he and the fat prison guard OP suck each other's micro s all day, neither one of them can be trolls, but he can hypocritically call the members he obsesses over "trolls" for doing the exact same that he does
Pretty weak argument on your behalf. I haven't read one single post by you yet where you criticize anything at all that the troll has posted even though you have read his "baiting" posts.So you can just throw labels around until one of them sticks in your opinion, but you aren't a troll? That's weak, dude. I mean seriously. You get to be the judge and jury but you get really incensed when someone else starts using aggressive adjectives.
That pretty much says it all.
I can agree with a republican, but that doesn't make me one. I can take a political stance -- that doesn't make me a politician. If you feel it does, your critical thinking skills are absolutely lacking. I mean, I guess it's easier to take the adolescent idea that everything has to be black or white, but again, you're only cheating yourself while you look down at everyone from that pedestal.
So wait. You're actually telling me that the way you respond to trolls is to try to criticize or reason with them? Are you serious? Do YOU know what a troll is?I haven't read one single post by you yet where you criticize anything at all that the troll has posted even though you have read his "baiting" posts.
We know. We have seen your posts.
And the final stooge of the three makes his troll appearance.Don't even bother reasoning with that clown..... in his mind, because he and the fat prison guard OP suck each other's micro s all day, neither one of them can be trolls, but he can hypocritically call the members he obsesses over "trolls" for doing the exact same that he does
The topic is Pop.
Right.Duh!
You have no room whatsoever to accuse others of poor reading comprehension.
If you can't figure out what the "common themes" are in those two threads, Manu and Pop respectively, then you really need that GED pretty badly!
So where is the same outrage against sbm for calling people "popsuckers" that you have for greatyacht calling people "manu s"
You can't even stick to your own definitions of what cons utes a troll for more than a page.
Already posted above some of the definitions of a troll. I respond to trolls in the only way they understand, like a parent to a wayward ignorant bratty child.I can agree with a republican, but that doesn't make me one. I can take a political stance -- that doesn't make me a politician. If you feel it does, your critical thinking skills are absolutely lacking. I mean, I guess it's easier to take the adolescent idea that everything has to be black or white, but again, you're only cheating yourself while you look down at everyone from that pedestal.
So wait. You're actually telling me that the way you respond to trolls is to try to criticize or reason with them? Are you serious? Do YOU know what a troll is?
What do you do?
Have you criticized any of them yet?
Nope, not that I have read.
It's an xmas troll tactic
You can't even stick to your own definitions of what cons utes a troll for more than a page.
So then, how does this relate to Pop?
Yes, I have, but instead of critizing the "known trolls" and calling them out, noooooooo, you choose to heap BS on the decent poster.
You can't even stick to your own definitions of what cons utes a troll for more than a page.
Your spots speak loud and clear for all to see. You are definitely a troll. Sorry I apologized to you, I was wrong about that.
Now can we please get back to the topic, or do you plan to keep sidetracking this thread.
Remember Pop?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote