Reply With Quote
As did Splitter. I think teams are willing to stash now, more than in the past.
Thank captain obvious.
But I remember Maciej Lampe fell down from being lottery pick to #31, because of troubles with his european contract.
As did Splitter. I think teams are willing to stash now, more than in the past.
If Valanciunas was picked up at 5 despite knowing that he won't play in the NBA atleast for a year after being drafted, I am sure teams have factored these things for Saric as well. Those days of bad GMs who could be swindled off by the good ones are somewhat past these days. Almost all teams have a good set of GMs these days.
I would love that personally. Where you can get a few of the fallers. Iglish, Micic, Dinwiddie, Christon, and others.
http://blog.mysanantonio.com/spursna...-in-the-draft/
list is basically the same as the one I compiled except for K.J Daniels.
Thanks for the lists and run downs, great job.
Why is cd021 not bolded? Some of the tiest posters on this site are bolded and this guy isn't? What kind of is that? Dude puts it work and actually talks basketball unlike others who just enjoy talking and have terrible terrible takes. (Yes, I know I'm a crappy poster but I gotta call out an injustice when I see it.) No Lyfe Scrub got bolded and that dude is straight garbage, smh.
Bolding means nothing.
That mysa article made every choice look bad.
Maybe because on ST as in life, it's not what you know but who you blow.
Rob, seriously, what difference does it make?
Besides, this is just a message board.
I'm dead, rofl.
Not much of a difference but I thought getting bolded actually meant something these days. As in being rewarded for bringing good takes and providing knowledge to the rest of the forum. It is what it is though.
I think we have all seen that it is not a reward for anything.
Like you say, it is what it is?
Mitch McGary apparently has a promise at #24 to Sacramento (via Marc Stein). He was listed on multiple mocks as being a candidate for the 30th pick
I appreciate that. For what its worth you wouldn't make my All Garbage-Posters ST team. There are some serious clowns on this site.
Do you suspect that OKC has made someone a promise?
No prob, and thanks man.
so Spurs need a back up for Kawhi yall think?
Lol Sacramento, that dude has no business in the first round.
Well they've worked out GR3, Early, and reportedly were interested in bringing in KJ McDaniels...all projected SFs at the next level. Then there's the sketchy CIA cir stances with Damien Inglis, who is also a SF. So there's certainly some smoke to that end...just not sure there's a fire.
Bron is an UFA...
Not really, but drafting one would give the Spurs one on the cheap without having to woo one in FA. Just having one on roster (likely not a rotation player with Beli and Manu at the 2 & 3 off the bench) if Leonard gets injured its a luxury. Instead of having Green slide up and having Beli play 2 guard, the Spurs could start the SF and play him about 15 minutes while keeping the rotation intact.
In FA Aminu is a great option, or Sef on the vet min. neither can really shoot but can defend which is always valuable to have an additional defender off the bench in case of foul trouble or injury
Haven't heard anything yet. In the latest B/R mock they have Capella (21st) and KJ Daniels (29th) going to OKC. I've also heard Early as well with the second pick.
I'm actually interested to see if they attempt to use the picks to try and acquire some depth or using 1 pick to package Perkins to a bad team (Milwaukee) so they won't have to amnesty him.
thanks for the correction it is Charlotte not Sacramento. I was reading his tweets about the potiential Josh Smith deal and accidentally put them in instead.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
