Reply With Quote
no one wants to team up with that piece of . Everyone knows Kobe eats first and would rather lose than watch his teammate win another finals MVP.
If James is going to try to get a ring for another team, it will be Cleveland. He's from there, that's where he grew up, that's where he will likely retire, and when he does he'd probably like to be the 1st guy to ever bring a championship to that city. If Cleveland could get him back, they could move some pieces and get someone with him who can turn that team into an instant ECF threat.
Just 1 had you guys on my front door stoop till you got straightened out a fortnight ago come Sunday.
It took us one try, not a ing decade.
Lakers will be lucky to land Stephenson,,,,tbh.
But, did you have to play dead in my over it?
How is this forum your door stoop?
Forget it.
Yeah probably a good idea. My riddle decoder is not broken, just doesn't give a .
Hey mid - my Lotto Lakers made over $100M just last year. Maybe we can afford more than Swaggy P?
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/gr...lion-pricetag/
• The Thunder are indeed paying into the revenue-sharing system, rare for such a tiny market, but they’re slated to make nearly $29 million in profit when everything is netted out. That’s the fifth-best projection in the league, trailing only the Lakers ($100.1 million), Bulls ($61 million), Rockets ($40.7 million), and Celtics ($33.1 million). Again: This memo does not capture the complete financial picture for any organization, but between this estimated profit and the general escalating value of all NBA franchises, it’s fair to take these numbers into account when debating the Thunder’s*decision to trade James Harden and duck the luxury tax.
• Holy cow, the Lakers! They end up with that huge profit despite contributing a league-high $49 million to revenue sharing. The league’s revenue sharing is complex, with payouts and contributions tied to all sorts of variables — market size, profitability, earnings benchmarks, and other stuff. A few teams, including the Lakers and Knicks, play in markets so large they are disqualified from ever receiving revenue-sharing payouts.
this shiiiiiiiiiiit
Just goes to prove the widely held belief that Laker fans are the dumbest on Earth
Kobe thinks the fans are dumb, ownership thinks the fans are dumb and other fans think they are dumb. This just hammers home that point.
Hey mid - my Lotto Lakers made over $100M just last year. Maybe we can afford more than Swaggy P?
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/gr...lion-pricetag/
• The Thunder are indeed paying into the revenue-sharing system, rare for such a tiny market, but they’re slated to make nearly $29 million in profit when everything is netted out. That’s the fifth-best projection in the league, trailing only the Lakers ($100.1 million), Bulls ($61 million), Rockets ($40.7 million), and Celtics ($33.1 million). Again: This memo does not capture the complete financial picture for any organization, but between this estimated profit and the general escalating value of all NBA franchises, it’s fair to take these numbers into account when debating the Thunder’s*decision to trade James Harden and duck the luxury tax.
• Holy cow, the Lakers! They end up with that huge profit despite contributing a league-high $49 million to revenue sharing. The league’s revenue sharing is complex, with payouts and contributions tied to all sorts of variables — market size, profitability, earnings benchmarks, and other stuff. A few teams, including the Lakers and Knicks, play in markets so large they are disqualified from ever receiving revenue-sharing payouts.
The Desperation!
The Desperation!
How so? mid basically said the Busses were broke (compared to other billionaire owners) and had limited revenue streams. He said the new CBA neutered the Lakers financial advantages and leveled the playing field.
I countered with reminding him about our $5B TWC contract. Grantland wrote the above piece spelling out what I've been saying all along: despite giving these small market leaches $49M and going lotto, they still raked in over $100M.
With Lowry staying in Toronto, there's one more player off the table...
Kobe will not get a LeBron or Mello type of free agent to play with him because he wants sidekicks not co-stars
to play with him. He does not have the temperament. Look at Shaq and Howard...The lakers will not get back till
he retires then years after that...Sucks to be a Laker fan. LOL......
He never gave an NBA le back like your Duncan did.
And he chased Daddy down, broke his ass:::
Kobe: 2
Daddy: 1
And Howard, well, Howard got up off his ass a couple months ago at 0-2 and he was ready to play him some basketball. Yeah.
Sorry but you guys second tier till Kobe is gone...Lakers are years away
Sad-but-true, but, Kobe never gave an NBA le back like your Duncan did. You're light 1, daddy. And you will be, forever.
Kobe is not the Kobe of 5 years ago. He is a older Wade type of player now. He is older now and gets hurt more. He has
more miles on him than a 66 VW bug. You need to bandwagon the Clippers for a few years...It's just not your time anymore.
It's about now not yesterday.
Clean your own ing house first. You gave away an NBA le a year ago.
Except it'll be a picture of Lebron and Melo with "Come"...The Begging Part 2.0
I hope they spell it right.
Going all out? Make sure you take out your teeth and swallow Jeannie! Brothers love getting head from white broads.
The pitch to Melo should be, "Look how much we are overpaying Kobe. You are really going to make you money when Kobe is gone and all you are is a volume jump shooter because we'll still be maxing your sorry ass out then, too!!!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
