Spurs: Honestly

**DMC** · 07-10-2014

How impressive is 4 consecutive trips to the final in maybe the worst conference in the history of the nba? Now I know it's hard to do, I'm just tired of hearing about it.

Making a thread about it is how you get it to go away tbh.

**DMC** · 07-10-2014

Originally Posted by Thread

6 is non redeemable. It cannot be reconciled. You'll go into the dust that is always the end...light 1.

5 always comes before 6.

**Horse** · 07-10-2014

ing morons I'm not fat and I'm Puerto Rican your moms love me. I do love donuts though.

**jimbo** · 07-10-2014

Originally Posted by Cowboys_Wear_Spurs

I rate it the same as the 80's Lakers, Not Impressive at ALL. The West sucked in the 80's. Very comparable to what the East was in the Early to mid 00's and the past 4 years. Spurs would have made the Finals the Past four years if they were in the EC and the Heat were in the West.

Spurs would have made probably 5-6 the last decade as well. Not discounting the Lakers in the 80's, they were a great team. But I only see maybe 6 finals appearances much like the Spurs if they played in the EC, which was much stronger in the 80's.

Heat would have been lucky to make it to one Finals the past 4 years if they were out West.

tbh you realize the Spurs lost to the Heat last year right? That's one year for sure they wouldn't have made the finals. The 2012 Heat were better than the 12' Spurs, so that's another. The 2011 Spurs were fools gold and Memphis showed that. The Celtics or Bulls were actually decent-good then too. That was the toughest the East had been in a while, the Spurs almost certainly don't make it through.

So that's one appearance..

**Cowboys_Wear_Spurs** · 07-10-2014

Originally Posted by jimbo

tbh you realize the Spurs lost to the Heat last year right? That's one year for sure they wouldn't have made the finals. The 2012 Heat were better than the 12' Spurs, so that's another. The 2011 Spurs were fools gold and Memphis showed that. The Celtics or Bulls were actually decent-good then too. That was the toughest the East had been in a while, the Spurs almost certainly don't make it through.

So that's one appearance..

Thats why I said if the Spurs were in the East and the Heat were out West. Manu breaking his arm was the breaking point for the Spurs in 2011. For 2000s, that is why I said early to mid 00s. Yes the East had about 4 years of the
last 17 years where they had a least two good teams in the conference.

**DJR210** · 07-10-2014

Originally Posted by robdiaz2191

, we know you Mexican, asking how to sneak multiple people into a room and . Broke ass motha a.

**jimbo** · 07-10-2014

Originally Posted by Cowboys_Wear_Spurs

Thats why I said if the Spurs were in the East and the Heat were out West. Manu breaking his arm was the breaking point for the Spurs in 2011. For 2000s, that is why I said early to mid 00s. Yes the East had about 4 years of the
last 17 years where they had a least two good teams in the conference.

Alright, I essentially stopped reading your post after I got to Spurs would have made the Finals the Past four years--so that'd explain it.

Manu was the 2011 team imo. So yeah him breaking his arm didn't help, but even having Manu back wouldn't make Blair grow half a foot, stop McDyess from existing and prevent Tim from being a TOSB those playoffs. The Celtics and Bulls were better teams in the East.

12 and 13, yeah. Spurs make it with ease.

The mid 2000s, I'm not so sure though. 01, yeah. 02- yeah 03, yeah. 04 no. 05 was almost as close as 6, but the Spurs probably still make it. 06, Miami would have been tough--no chance if the refs were on their side like they were in the Finals. 07, yeah. 08- No. 09- No.

So 3 straight is the most I can see happening imo. Probably don't win any more les though.