Reply With Quote
This better not go 70 pages.
serviceable big man just bad defense..can we use him? thoughts?
This better not go 70 pages.
Someone will claim him for about 4 mil and it'd actually be a good deal. Spurs can't.
T-Spence @tspence26 20s
@hagakkure I am in the chat room
no
Jesus.....
i want zero part of Boozer, even at the vets min if he gets amnestied
**Contribution to a 70 page thread post**
yes, not too much different than gasol, really.
except for the passing, 3 pt shooting, championship experience, height and ball IQ they are similar players
He will also return to the Cavs and then the circle will be complete.
Booz for a minimal contract would work.
He'd be the 4th big instantly. Boozer/Splitter is a good balance of offense and defense against opposing benches.
Of course they can?
The Spurs shouldn't let him go.
boozer and duncan already played together and it didn't work out..... anybody remember 2004 Olympics?
I say NO.
Yeah, he's obviously way better than Jeff Ayres..
We would have to kiss all those Gooden=Boozer jokes goodbye.
Not expecting an amnesty, but if he's amnestied of course we should try to get him.
He played 76 games last year and his averages are 13.7 pts and 8.3 rebs in just 28 minutes. His PER is better than Diaw.(Not claiming he's better than Diaw, but he's not that bad)
He's overpaid, but he's also very underrated in my opinion. It's a no-brainer for veteran minimum. Since not using MLE this year, we'll able to use it next year.
Someone with cap space will put in an amnesty bid. Won't effect us.
that scrub, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
