Today I learned that "possibly accurate" and "most credible source" mean the same thing to you.
So if I found a random YouTube channel, regardless of what it says about anything, you consider it the most credible source? Because I got some people who would love to talk to you about chemtrails.
"I'm wildcobra. actual investigations, I found a contratrian who uses a dramatic voice on top of his shoddy cut and paste Windows movie maker narratives! He seems reliable!"
You idiot. I did not say it was the most credible source.Today I learned that "possibly accurate" and "most credible source" mean the same thing to you.
I said it may be.
Did you follow the link in Youtube and sub links by chance?So if I found a random YouTube channel, regardless of what it says about anything, you consider it the most credible source? Because I got some people who would love to talk to you about chemtrails.
The retraction in the NY Times?
You already have decide...
It's been hilarious over the years looking at what sources you feel are credible and what sources you feel are driven by lib s
It's incredible entertaining to watch totally stupid s like yourself come to unfounded conclusions.
I'm not the one coming to a conclusion on this matter.
You stupid s are concluding I have come to a conclusion.
One anonymous source says...What I’ve been told by one source, who has provided accurate information on similar matters in the past, is that U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms.
The source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops were actually eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers involved were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said.
Given that the Russian separatists don't have an air force to actually shoot down, and have themselves been bragging about all the ukrianian military aircraft they have been shooting down, we would need a bit more than one anonymous source to assign any credibility to this more implausible scenario.
LOL "credible" source on infowars.com
i won't believe it until i here what tspence has to say
I will dismiss it as likely inaccurate.
Such a theory is not anywhere near a better fit to the facts available, than a stupid, over-eager bunch of ill-trained rednecks might have pulled the trigger on what they thought was a military transport plane. I will be happy to flesh that out, if you want.
I would though, ask how much "credibility" do you think this "one unnamed source" have? Score of 1-100, with one being the lowest.
I would agree with the statement "this may be the most credible", but that is not saying much. I find it very un-credible, but out of the realm of other possibilities, i.e. aliens, or koreans, that would mean very little.
Does this mean you consider fact to be what consensus says, or what is most probable?
You mean like your unfounded conclusion about black surgeons?
God you are a ing re .
I never concluded any such thing. Again, you are making unfounded conclusions of what you think my conclusions are. My words were to show the damage racial based quota systems have.
Your conclusion was that black surgeons are unworthy of your trust because they were more likely to have benefited from Affirmative Action than their colleagues of any other race.
You stated that. Plainly.
Oh bull .
I put that out as to show what it looks like to some people. It is a valid thought that crosses some people's mind. Quota systems cause concern of.
Bring that thread back up if you wish to continue. It doesn't belong in this one.
Who's troll are you to finally jump into this thread for that?
Have anything to contribute to this thread, or are you trying to derail it like a degenerate?
More information:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...down.html?_r=0
A degenerate? I merely responded to something you said.
Posting a random YouTube link and attacking people for subjecting it to doubt counts as contributing? Lawsy me, you just advocated for every Laker troll that's ever ventured onto Spurstalk.
u know whats interesting about this incident? MAS is doing jack , just like the other plane also doing jack without giving any answers or any effort ...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote