Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 435
  1. #251
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    The U.S Has More Solar Workers Than Coal Miners

    Though solar power is still far from surpassing coal as America’s primary energy source, the number of people employed by the solar industry has surpassed the number of coal miners. The non-profit Solar Foundation estimates that there are about 142,000 people in the U.S. workforce who spend “at least 50% of their time supporting solar-related activities,” according to Business Insider.

    So what does this mean for the future of energy in America? Quite simply put, it highlights how solar power is growing at a rapid pace, with record-breaking 43 GWH estimated to be installed around the world this year, and the U.S. is estimated to make up about 6.6 GWH of those new installations.

    http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/22/u-s-solar-workers-coal-miners/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+IM-cleantechnica+%28CleanTechnica%29

  2. #252
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Arizona Solar Property Tax Battle — SolarCity & SunRun Sue

    Residential leasing companies SolarCity and SunRun filed a lawsuit on June 30th against the Arizona Department of Revenue. The legal dispute is filed in opposition to property taxes levied onto leased PV systems in Arizona. Affirmations came independently from each company that the complaint was filed and delivered a replica of the official do ents.

    This taxes are a hindrance to the development with rooftop solar, and seemingly an unlawful one. How does the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) presume that solar energy equipment is taxable if leased? The amount, 20% of the solar power system’s depreciated cost, ends up being about $152 a year for an average solar customer.

    A law firm hired by SolarCity and Sunrun argues that third-party PV systems should not be subject to property taxes, since they are not part of the property owner’s… property. SolarCity notes that the tax will limit Arizona’s solar PV market.


    Homeowners in Arizona, a state that was the nation’s fourth-largest market for residential, commercial, and ins utional PV in 2013, are economically challenged with this change. Roy L Hales of CleanTechnica points out that 85-90% of the state’s rooftop solar installations are leased, rather than owned. It’s no secret that a new tax could have a strong negative impact.

    Hales further explains: “The Arizona Legislature has made it clear that the Subject Property, when used ‘primarily for on-site consumption’ of the electricity generated by such property, is ‘considered to have no value and to add no value’ to the property on which it is installed, and thus it should not be separately assessed for property tax purposes.”


    http://solarlove.org/arizona-solar-p...ty-sunrun-sue/

    EEI/ALEC/Repugs will try any and all tactics to kill compe ion from distributed solar.



  3. #253
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    One of the BIG LIES of EEI and centralized power industry is that solar and wind power are not stable, but something weird happened in Germany, and it wasn't destabilization of the German grid.

    Germany Added A Lot Of Wind And Solar Power, And Its Electric Grid Became More Reliable





    To hear its critics tell it, Germany’s ambitious push to switch over to renewable energy has delivered an electrical grid that’s capricious, unreliable, and prone to blackouts. But according to data highlighted by ECO Report last week, the reality on the ground couldn’t be further from that caricature.

    Specifically, the availability of electricity in Germany was lost only for an average of 15.91 minutes per customer in 2012, according to figures from the Council of European Energy Regulators. That’s far better than the United States, which saw its electricity become unavailable for a whopping 244 minutes per customer in 2008. Germany also did significantly better than the United Kingdom (lost 81.42 minutes per customer in 2008), the Netherlands (lost 33.7 minutes per customer) and France (lost 95.1 minutes per customer). Of all the countries tracked, Japan and Singapore are the only two with grid reliability to match Germany’s.


    And the country has actually maintained this record for several years: 2008 was the last year in Germany when the amount of minutes lost per customer breached 16.

    ECO Report pointed to a recent article in Bloomberg as an example of the standard story on Germany. The argument goes that by making a big policy push to move the electrical grid onto to renewables like solar and wind — which produce power intermittently, since no one can control when the sun is out or the wind blows — and by making the purely political decision to phase out its nuclear fleet following the Fukushima disaster, Germany has left itself without the kind of reliable baseload power that can only be provided by nuclear reactors or fossil fuels like natural gas and coal.


    As Bloomberg points out, Germany’s domestic electricity has become far more dynamic. Twenty of the country’s biggest utilities are now earning fees in the balancing market, an exchange where firms can earn additional profits by pledging to add or cut electricity within seconds to keep the power system stable. That’s double the amount of utilities that were participating in the balancing market just back in September — and the fees provided by the market can pay utilities as much as 400 times what they’d usually earn with wholesale electricity prices.


    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...te+Progress%29



  4. #254
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    esp in Red States where Repugs say they hate govt regulations...

    Rules prevent solar panels in many states with abundant sunlight




    Florida is one of several states, mostly in the Southeast, that combine copious sunshine with extensive rules designed to block its use by homeowners to generate power.
    States like Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York — not known for clear, blue skies — have outpaced their counterparts to the south in the installation of rooftop solar panels.
    While the precise rules vary from state to state, one explanation is the same: opposition from utilities grown nervous by the rapid encroachment of solar firms on their business.


    The business models that have made solar systems financially viable for millions of homeowners in California, New England and elsewhere around the country are largely illegal in Florida, Virginia, South Carolina and some other Southern states. Companies that pioneered the industry, such as SolarCity Corp. and Sunrun Inc., do not even attempt to do business there.

    "We get all kinds of inquiries every day" from the South, said Will Craven, spokesman for SolarCity. "People there want to be our customers."
    Florida, in particular, is known as the "sleeping giant" of his industry, Craven said. "It has a ton of sunshine, a ton of rooftops," he said. "But there is no rooftop solar industry in Florida."

    When Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Va., installed solar panels a few years ago, for example, the local utility, Dominion Virginia Power, threatened legal action. The utility said that only it could sell electricity in its service area. The university and the solar firm it worked with had to change their lease arrangement and forfeit valuable tax credits.

    Soon after, in South Carolina, objections from another utility forced the cancellation of about 80 contracts under which a solar firm had planned to provide panels free of charge to churches and school districts.

    http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...ack=rss#page=1

    Thanks, Repugs! Always moving the country forward!



  5. #255
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    the govt down here is pulling out of solar power industry...lol invested 11b only to pull out what a bunch of wankers playing with taxpayers money

  6. #256
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    How EVs Could Make Solar Viable Without Subsidies

    Investment bank UBS says the addition of electric vehicles, and the proliferation of battery storage, will solve the problem of intermittency for rooftop solar and make it viable without subsidies. So much so, it says, that households will be able to budget for 12 years of “free electricity” for a 20-year solar system.

    In a major report on the “revolution” that could hit energy markets any time soon, UBS says – as we report here – that the combination of EVs plus solar plus storage will deliver a payback time of 6-8 years by 2020 – effectively making centralised fossil fuel generation redundant.


    It says this is not understood by the utility industry or the market, because they are “not yet looking at the topics of solar, EVs and stationary batteries with a holistic view.”




    “Our proprietary model (above) shows it is the combination of the three that makes solar fully compe ive and that has the potential to bring disruptive changes to the electricity sector.





    http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/22/...eanTechnica%29



  7. #257
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Rooftop Solar May Reach Grid Parity In 25+ States By 2017




    In just three years, new numbers tell us, more than half of the states in the US may have rooftop solar available at the same price as the local grid’s electric rates. And that’s even without considering state and local incentives!
    The Cambridge-based Union of Concerned Scientists has just published a series of three quick infographics. Here’s what they show:

    • By 2017, more than half the states could have rooftop solar as cheap as local electricity prices.
    • Installing rooftop solar has never been more affordable.
    • The number of households with rooftop solar is skyrocketing.





    http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/20/...eanTechnica%29

  8. #258
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    The U.S Has More Solar Workers Than Coal Miners

    Though solar power is still far from surpassing coal as America’s primary energy source, the number of people employed by the solar industry has surpassed the number of coal miners. The non-profit Solar Foundation estimates that there are about 142,000 people in the U.S. workforce who spend “at least 50% of their time supporting solar-related activities,” according to Business Insider.

    So what does this mean for the future of energy in America? Quite simply put, it highlights how solar power is growing at a rapid pace, with record-breaking 43 GWH estimated to be installed around the world this year, and the U.S. is estimated to make up about 6.6 GWH of those new installations.

    http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/22/u-s-solar-workers-coal-miners/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+IM-cleantechnica+%28CleanTechnica%29
    Interesting. Coal interests will now be facing some serious money challenging them in their control of Congress.

  9. #259
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Interesting. Coal interests will now be facing some serious money challenging them in their control of Congress.
    the coal companies killed coal jobs by moving to strip mining more than renewable energy ever could.
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-15-2014 at 04:03 AM.

  10. #260
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    As usual, Repug doing their very best, per strategy, to things up for the 99%.

    Push To Impose Extra Fees On Solar Customers Draws Outrage In Wisconsin

    A recent move by Wisconsin utility We Energies to not only raise electricity rates on all consumers but also to add an additional charge on those who produce their own energy and sell it back to the grid has sparked outrage within the state and beyond.

    The plan would raise the “fixed charge” on all customers’ electric bills from $9 to $16 a month, as well as reduce net metering — a policy that enables customers with solar panels or other forms of distributed generation to sell their excess electricity back to the grid — and add a new charge on these electricity-generating customers.


    The result of such a policy, said Matt Neumann, owner of Wisconsin-based SunVest, would be dramatic: “It would not only end solar but remove the economic viability for any renewable energy in Wisconsin.” Neuman, whose company is the largest solar installer in the state, said the demand charge of $3.80 per kilowatt (kW) per month works out to about $220 per year for a 5 kW system, a deterrent for potential solar customers and an unfair penalty for those who have already chosen to go solar.

    It would not only end solar but remove the economic viability for any renewable energy in Wisconsin.And by increasing fixed charges by 75 percent, Neumann said the utility is punishing everyone, even those who have taken steps to reduce their electricity consumption. The proposal also seeks to ban third-party ownership of renewable energy systems, meaning those customers who rent or lease, rather than owning the entire system outright.

    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...sconsin-solar/

    Thanks, Repugs and all you Repug voters!



  11. #261
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Well Be- ...

    That's what happens when you attack the fossil fuel sector. They needd to stay in business, and pass on costs to their customers.

    The added monthly cost is a huge increase by percentage, but when is the last time it was raised? The $0.00528 /KWh ($3.80/KWmonth) charge for selling electricity back isn't excessive. They need to maintain the lines and \charge that by KWh used to the consumer, why not also charge for the power going back? If they are using no electricity, and only selling it back, they are not paying a distribution charge without this new fee.

  12. #262
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Well Be- ...

    That's what happens when you attack the fossil fuel sector. They needd to stay in business, and pass on costs to their customers.

    The added monthly cost is a huge increase by percentage, but when is the last time it was raised? The $0.00528 /KWh ($3.80/KWmonth) charge for selling electricity back isn't excessive. They need to maintain the lines and \charge that by KWh used to the consumer, why not also charge for the power going back? If they are using no electricity, and only selling it back, they are not paying a distribution charge without this new fee.
    solar customers who sell their juice deliver it locally, not across 100s or 1000s of miles of transmission lines.

    Centralized electricity operators have NOTHING but self-interest, and politicians they own (esp Repugs), in blocking distributed solar.

  13. #263
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    solar customers who sell their juice deliver it locally, not across 100s or 1000s of miles of transmission lines.

    Centralized electricity operators have NOTHING but self-interest, and politicians they own (esp Repugs), in blocking distributed solar.
    They are using the electrical companies assets that need to be maintained, which costs money.

    I'll bet your monthly electric bill has a "distribution charge" on it. Actually, I just pulled up my online bill. I forgot about the transmission charge. Directly from my bill, meter read 9/10/14 for a 29 day billing.


    Meter #IN<snip>,Schedule 07
    Energy Charges
    Basic Charge 10.00
    Energy Use Charge
    674.000 kWh x 6.24500˘ 42.09
    Transmission Charge
    674.000 kWh x 0.28300˘ 1.91
    Distribution Charge
    674.000 kWh x 3.79400˘ 25.57


    79.57

    Adjustments
    102 RPA Exchange Credit ( 674.000 kWh x -0.79000˘ )* 5.32 CR
    109 Energy Efficiency Funding Adj ( 674.000 kWh x 0.34000˘ ) 2.29
    110 Energy Efficiency Customer Svc ( 674.000 kWh x 0.00700˘ ) 0.05
    123 Decoupling Adjustment ( 674.000 kWh x 0.03400˘ ) 0.23
    135 Demand Response ( 674.000 kWh x 0.02600˘ ) 0.18
    137 Solar Payment Option Cost Recov ( 674.000 kWh x 0.03100˘ ) 0.21
    144 Capital Projects Adjustment ( 674.000 kWh x 0.13200˘ ) 0.89
    145 Boardman Decommissioning Adj ( 674.000 kWh x 0.02700˘ ) 0.18

    1.29 CR

    Taxes and Fees
    City of Portland Tax (1.5%) 1.12
    Multnomah County Tax (0.189%) 0.14
    Low Income Assistance 0.84
    Public Purpose Charge (3%) 2.30

    4.40

    Current Charges 82.68
    Whoop-t-do... The article is complaining about an additional 0.52800˘ per KWh...

    Thank-you for pointing out the transmission charge is source to grid charges. They are small compared to local distribution... i.e. distribution charges.

    I wouldn't complain about a solar sourcing distribution charge that is only 14% of the receiving distribution charge. Now of course, it is inaccurate for me to compare my charges to those in another state, but I'll bet they aren't too much different.

    When I clicked on one, I got all the definitions:

    Energy Charges
    Energy Charges include charges for the amount of energy you use, costs to bring the power to you, and any applicable Renewable Portfolio Option charges.

    Basic Charge
    The Basic Charge supports fixed costs such as meter reading, equipment, maintenance and billing necessary to serve customers, regardless of the amount of energy used. You pay the basic charge even if no electricity is used. It is a charge for having service available.

    Energy Use Charge
    The Energy Use Charge is the amount of electricity used multiplied by the cost for energy as stated in your rate schedule. For residential customers, kWh charges are on a tiered rate structure. You pay a lower price for the first 1,000 kWh you use each month. Energy charges for Time of Use and Flex PriceSM customers will be differentiated by the time of day and day of the week that the customer uses electricity.

    Transmission and distribution charges
    Transmission and distribution charges cover the cost of bringing power to you. The charges are broken out so you can see the cost of maintaining the utility poles, lines, substations, transmission towers and other equipment.

    Renewable Portfolio Options
    If you opt to support Green SourceSM, Clean WindSM, or Healthy HabitatSM Renewable Portfolio Options, a separate charge for the option will appear on your bill.

    Adjustments
    Adjustments are listed separately from your energy costs for transparency and because they often change. Some will eventually go away while new ones may be added. Others may periodically change from charges to credits or credits to charges.

    102 Regional Power Act Exchange Credit (BPA Subscription Power Credit)
    This credit was designed to give residential customers of investor-owned utilities access to the low-cost power of the Columbia River federally owned hydro-power system. For residential customers, this credit is on a tiered rate structure. PGE gains no additional revenues or profits from this adjustment; the law requires PGE to pass the benefits directly through to our customers.

    105 Regulatory Adjustments
    This adjustment collects or refunds miscellaneous items.

    108 Public Purpose Charge (3 percent)
    This charge will continue until January 1, 2026 for the purpose of funding energy efficiency, renewable resources, low-income energy efficiency, and housing and energy efficiency in schools. The public purpose charge is mandated by Oregon statute. PGE does not keep this money; PGE collects from customers and then passes the amount collected to various organizations responsible for these programs, such as the Oregon Housing and Community Services Department and the Energy Trust of Oregon.

    109 Energy Efficiency Funding Adjustment
    This adjustment is to fund additional energy efficiency measures for the benefit of PGE’s customers pursuant to the Oregon Renewable Energy Act through programs administered by the Energy Trust of Oregon.

    110 Energy Efficiency Customer Service
    This adjustment is to fund PGE activities associated with helping customers be more energy efficient. Such activities include project facilitation, technical assistance, education and assistance to support programs administered by the Energy Trust of Oregon.

    115 Low Income Assistance
    This fee is mandated by Oregon statute. The purpose of this fee is to provide stable funding for low income customers who cannot pay their electric bills. PGE does not keep this money but passes it on to the Oregon Department of Housing and Community Services, which then distributes the funds to the various local Community Action Program agencies within PGE’s service territory.

    122 Renewable Resources Automatic Adjustment Clause
    This adjustment recovers the cost of renewable energy resource projects not otherwise included in the energy charge.

    123 Decoupling Adjustment
    This adjustment has two parts. For Schedules 7 Residential and 32 Small Nonresidential, Decoupling tracks and adjusts the fixed portion of revenues (transmission, distribution and fixed generation) associated with variations in energy use not attributable to weather. The Lost Revenue Recovery Adjustment portion of this tariff trues-up forecast and actual energy efficiency for applicable Large Nonresidential customers.

    125 Annual Power Cost Update
    This adjustment reflects annual changes in unit net variable power costs relative to the unit net variable power costs contained in base rates.

    126 Annual Power Cost Variance Mechanism
    This adjustment recognizes in rates, part of the difference for a given year between net variable power costs incurred and projected net variable power costs.

    128 Short-Term Transition Adjustment
    This adjustment applies to nonresidential customers who are on Schedules 515, 532, 538, 549, 575, 583, 585, 589, 591, 592, (Direct Access service) or have selected a PGE daily market pricing option (other than cost of service).

    129 Long-Term Transition Cost Adjustment
    This adjustment applies to Large nonresidential customers who are on Schedules 485 and 489.

    135 Demand Response Cost Recovery Mechanism
    This adjustment recovers the costs associated with PGE’s automated demand response program.

    137 Solar Payment Option Cost Recovery
    This adjustment recovers the costs associated with the Solar Payment Option pilot program.

    140 Income Tax Adjustment
    This adjustment implements the automatic income tax adjustment required by an Oregon Revised Statue and establishes the balancing account and automatic adjustment clause required by the Oregon Public Utility Commission.

    145 Boardman Power Plant Operating Life Adjustment
    This adjustment establishes the mechanism to implement in rates, the revenue effect of a Public Utility Commission-authorized change in the Boardman Power Plant’s assumed end of life year of 2040 to an end of life year of 2020.
    Last edited by Wild Cobra; 09-15-2014 at 02:26 PM.

  14. #264
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    Here is the gauge on my house. Summertime I am returning a negligible amount of electricity to the grid, and if I do, my neighbor is using it so they don't have to transmit so much from the power plant.

    http://egauge4225.egaug.es/

  15. #265
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Like water and roads, electricity companies should not be investor-owned/for-profit. National them all AND the national grid.

  16. #266
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    Like water and roads, electricity companies should not be investor-owned/for-profit. National them all AND the national grid.
    ing communist.

  17. #267
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    heavily regulated capitalism and financce have roles, but unregulated American capitalism is ing us and the environment hard and deep.

  18. #268
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    Nationalizing private companies is what third world banana republics do.

  19. #269
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Nationalizing private companies is what third world banana republics do.
    investors, finacial secotrs, oligarchs, mega-corps, monopolies ing Americans and their environment is what America does.

  20. #270
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    sucks to be poor pitiful Boutons.

  21. #271
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Here is the gauge on my house. Summertime I am returning a negligible amount of electricity to the grid, and if I do, my neighbor is using it so they don't have to transmit so much from the power plant.

    http://egauge4225.egaug.es/
    That's cool. I believe you showed us that once before.

    Looks like your AC uses 4,000 watts!

    Yes, I understand the distribution isn't far, but they have to charge something for those who are always feeding rather than using. They still have to maintain the lines.

    Is the 1/2 cent per KWh really excessive?

  22. #272
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    sucks to be poor pitiful Boutons.
    Yep.

    I'll pay have for a one way trip to Cuba for him if he stays there.

    Will you splurge for the other half?

  23. #273
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    The Growth Of Residential Solar Energy



    http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/17/...eanTechnica%29

  24. #274
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Solar power is growing so fast that older energy companies are trying to stop it

    If you ask the people who run America's electric utilities what keeps them up at night, a surprising number will say solar power. Specifically, rooftop solar.

    That seems bizarre at first. Solar power provides just 0.4 percent of electricity in the United States — a minuscule amount. Why would anyone care?

    But utilities see things differently. As solar technology gets dramatically cheaper, tens of thousands of Americans are putting photovoltaic panels up on their roofs, generating their own power. At the same time, 43 states and Washington DC have "net metering" lawsthat allow solar-powered households to sell their excess electricity back to the grid at retail prices.

    That's a genuine problem for utilities. All these solar households are now buying less and less electricity, but the utilities still have to manage the costs of connecting them to the grid. Indeed, a new study fromLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory argues that, without policy changes, this trend could soon put utilities in dire financial straits. If rooftop solar were to grab 10 percent of the market over the next decade, utility earnings could decline as much as 41 percent.

    To avoid that fate, many utilities are now pushing for reforms that would at least slow the breakneck growth of rooftop solar — say, by scaling back those "net metering" laws. And that's opened up a war with many fronts. There are solar advocates who'd prefer not to see any changes. There are conservative groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) pushing to pare back solar subsidies.

    And there are even Tea Party groups now defending solar. Meanwhile, state regulators are struggling to find compromises that would both allow solar to expand but also ensure that there's enough money to maintain the existing grid.


    http://www.vox.com/2014/9/29/6849723...s-fight-states



  25. #275
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Subsidies should be eliminated.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •