Reply With Quote
He won't do that. Not after seeing Parsons and Hayward get stupid money.
& your mother could get up off your in' face so you could breathe out your mouth instead of your asshole.
He won't do that. Not after seeing Parsons and Hayward get stupid money.
You're looking at this wrong, El. Since Dale defended 48.5, he is now logically stuck defending each and every bad contract in this league.
At 26/6/6 it represented a 20% cut. Easily defensible.
I really have lost some respect for him this free agency, which sucks because he has been one of my favorites in the league. Most people in here are saying he isn't worth the max, but if Parsons got 15 M a year and Hayward got the max, bledsoe has every right to believe he should get the max too.
He's a great defender, a decent distributor (could use work here), a great rebounder for a guard, and a solid finisher with an improving 3 point shot that isn't a liability anymore. If I were a rebuilding team without a point guard, I'd be happy with him being my point for the forseeable future. Not saying I'd throw him the max because he isn't worth it (though I understand why he thinks he is) but for like 4 years 60 mil I'd pull the trigger
When did thread come back. lol
I understand the 6 is for 6 games played, but what's the 26? Shooting percentage?
Neither of them got the 5 year max with 7.5% raises, which is what it sounds like he wants.
what is this 26/6/6 you keep referring to?
When you mother dismounted.
You figure it out, blankethead.
Oooo. The psychological pain of insults. I just might retaliate from due to my self induced rage of a situation that never happened.
Luckily I have the best come back of all time:
No. Your mother did that!!!
i get that its 26 wins, but not sure what the 6/6 are standing for... i would think its the #6 overall pick, but the Lakers pick goes to Phoenix if its out of the top 5. i think you're confused
Bend over. I'll show you in' confused.
but seriously, there's no purpose in trying to justify the unjustifiable. you pay a guy for what he's expected to bring during that time period, not for what he did once before. if your logic is the latter (which it appears to be), then tell me how much money the Lakers will be paying him after retirement. you know, for past performances
But Parsons is better than Kiwi, remember ?
They cut his pay 20% after 25/6/6.
they didnt take the achilles, age, or decline into account. you dont pay a man 24 million based on what he did LAST year. that's what LAST year's contract was for, silly
Of course you do.
In the regular season last year obviously.
so when he retires, are they going to pay him again for the previous year?
Talk about a
job.... Harden only shows up in the regular season too but you still cling to his nuts....
3 months ago, he was better than kawhi. now he's a guy who can't create his own shot and is a worse defender than James Har_en
Did you predict Kawhi playing like he did in the finals? I'm sure you didn't. No one did.3 months ago, he was better than kawhi. now he's a guy who can't create his own shot and is a worse defender than James Har_en
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
