Reply With Quote
Latinos and African Americans were having more kids than Whites before Obama.
Populations change in ethnic makeup and average age.
Does this frighten groups that already have a record of oppression.
Thinkin a bit of revenge? That scares the Nazi?
Latinos and African Americans were having more kids than Whites before Obama.
Populations change in ethnic makeup and average age.
Does this frighten groups that already have a record of oppression.
Thinkin a bit of revenge? That scares the Nazi?
You foresee the USA being (the only) a well off Brown nation?
good luck getting a heartfelt answer on this one and/or any acknowledgement that there is any physiological/psychological differences between races. Other than in athletics.
So you imply there are no brown nations that do well...
What reason is behind this?
And Why (implied by you), are white nations so well off?
Do tell...
The US didn't become an economic powerhouse until after abolition. The Arabs and Africans also dominated the know world for about as much time over the last 2000 years as anyone else. The Ottoman's fell a century or so ago and the last Caliphate was no more so most people don't recognize that truth but it is what it is.
I imagine when Constantinople fell 500 years ago, there were equivalent dip phrenologists who made the same stupid comments.
Its typical hubris to think that because one group is on top that they will remain on top forever.
Last time i pointed that out, dip on his troll tried to say Arabs were 'aryan.'
Then there is the entire premise of your post.
I don't see any Brown nations thriving. There is potential but the running joke is USA turning into Brazil
Many reasons but the ones I'd attribute most are rights for women and decline of religion
Asians have all but closed the gap. South Americans are making baby steps.
Ottomans are as much European as Egyptians are African.
world domination doesn't always equate to progress...in particular, technological progress. which hopefully will result in cultural progress as well. but until people are willing to acknowledge that there are differences in races, then we're just spinning our wheels at best.
As long as the races want to consider themselves different then there will always be cultural differences. It is still phrenology. White people really like to line breed nonetheless. Conflating people in skandinavia to those in alabama because of skin color is frankly, stupid.
The Ottomans and Moors were dramatically ahead of us in math and engineering too btw. It's why we use arabic numerals. While we were living in mud huts and fighting over the scraps of the Romans who had abandoned Rome, they were at their zenith. The Gauls, Celts Angles, and Saxons that most of us descended from were living in mud huts and eating dirt when the Romans conquered them in the first place.
Do you not think there are differences between the races? There are well do ented differences between breeds of dogs. Why is it not OK to say the same about humans? It doesn't make any of them less important. But it does allow us to move past this bull about trying to shoehorn people into jobs and situations that they just weren't made for.
Not to say that there aren't smart bulldogs that can do different things but if I want a smart herding dog, I'm best off picking from collies and shepherds. Does that make me dog racist?
When humans start systematically selective breeding for traits then sure. Do I think that slavers killing and breeding for several hundred years shaped the local population? Sure. What i don't think is that skin color as genetic marker is universally applicable.
I think it should be viewed like geneticists do in terms of isolated populations and not phrenology.
Fair enough.
Not skin color, then how about skull sizes, bone density, etc?
Fake ass scientist
Like skull shape and earlobe length? Do you know what phrenology is?
I mentioned populations for a reason. You should be happy as I am admitting that white line breeding in the US has created genetically unique populations.
Please, in your own words explain the biomechanics of how 'skull size' or 'bone density' is genetically expressed.
It's hard to tell if you are trolling or really just that dumb. This is WC levels of ignorance, Adolph.
So white nations that give equal rights to women thrive. Like the US after WW II where women's rights were... Still missing? Back to the kitchen, we got the men back for the factories?
Good, real good.
More along the lines of allowing women in schools
The Egyptians, who were very dark, gave us some of the most important advances in math.
But they are not Africans because they lacked really broad noses and full lips.
So people with full lips and broad noses don't make much progress either...
I'm learning, keep going.
Uhh the big increase of women in our universities is a fairly recent phenomena.
who let you out all of a sudden? anyway...since you are trying to make a counter point to your own post, what big lipped, broad nosed nation are you going to suggest is a world leader? The NBA?
Uganda?
maybe it's Kenya...
Progress is not linked with skin color. Read Very_Limited. Egyptians are not really Africans.
Maybe you should read and follow the person I am responding to?
I know Poland was the first European nation to allow women in Universities in the 15th Century
No coincidence it coincides with White emergence
And not all people of color treat their women as second class.
And not all pale skins treat their women as equals.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
