When did God murder people?
since we don't need to kill other humans to survive, I'm sure you misunderstood him.
Either way, I don't care.
When did God murder people?
Man wrote the Bible.
No reason to trust any of it.
lol wut
The Flood.
, now it's kindergarten Sunday School.
Most translations are in agreement that it says murder and not kill.
So says the bag of rocks!
And when you step on an ant, are you murdering an ant?
Wut you need to kill humans to survive?
How was killing people that did not follow the law murder? Geez man, you're a special kind of .
so only adults were killed in the flood?
honest truth, you're re ed and lack critical thinking skills.
No, but under the cir stances it was okay and was not murder.
Most but not all.
Who's word are we going to trust to say which is the true interpretation.
If blake and his fellow buddies of trolls said they all believed that "murder" was the correct one, and a decent poster who had studied theology for years said it was "kill", then who would you tend to believe?
Or would you "believe" none of them?
Again, biblical "interpretation" by so many different men, religious sects, and by those whose sole agenda was to sell the most bibles, makes all this very suspect as to who has the true interpretation.
clearly you dont understand what arguments are
one of the 10 commandments says we can't work on sundays![]()
Serious question: Do you guys enjoy this thing that you have going on here?
Not to mention just all the interpretations by "men" with their own agendas to push, but one also has to consider whether or not it should be taken "literally" because who is telling us that it should be literal, and who is telling us that it is not, plus who is telling us that some is literal, and some is not?
All of these are the actions of "men" who have their own particular agendas they want others to accept blindly.
How can an atheists claim that God is evil for killing humans when in their eyes humans are just animals. Atheists kill animals to eat every day, so atheists are evil?
they dont call me Philo for nothing
to make the argument, they accept the premise that god exists, and that humans are different than the animals.. the point they make is that even in the christian image (god exists, made us, different than animals), god's will/actions could easily be seen as evil, in some cases
So in other words RG believes in God but hates him because he is evil?
, I'm out.
accepting a premise to make an argument =/= belief
i dont believe in god but i was arguing with you about god's perception of a day, when he rested, etc. clearly you understand the distinction
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)