Reply With Quote
Lol under the cir stances.
basically God cared more about getting the animals on the ark than children.
God forbid he just snap his fingers and make more animals.
Or better yet, just not create evil in the first place.
Lol rob.
Dat ebola though.
Lol under the cir stances.
basically God cared more about getting the animals on the ark than children.
God forbid he just snap his fingers and make more animals.
Or better yet, just not create evil in the first place.
Lol rob.
Which brings us back to the argument of whether the bible is literal or if it is allegory.
Humans are animals though in your eyes. So both were of equal value.
from what i gather, you don't take it literally, meaning you disagree with not only the non-believers such as myself (since you have faith to some degree, and i have none... but also believers like robdiaz who unlike you take it literally)
so which parts do you think are fake? genesis? christ? moses? noah?
he never said that. who decided that all animals are of "equal value?" and every individual can decide on his own what the "value" of each life is. heck not every human is of equal value, tbh
Who is he to make that call? According to his beliefs humans are a more evolved animal. Why is he giving one animal more value than another?
In order for someone to claim God is evil for killing humans they must accept that humans are not animals. If that's the case then how can they believe in evolution?
who said all animals are equal?
your assuming that this is anyone's logic is re ed.
we aren't "more evolved" we're just more successfully evolved than others. new species have been born since human arrival, such as dogs.
and who are you to tell Blake how to evaluate value of life? everybody sees it differently. i imagine you find human life more valuable than a serial killer would, for example. everyone has their own "moral compass"
Who is he to tell me God is evil?
well, if he asked a man to kill his child (even though he stopped Abraham before he actually went through with it, still ed up imo to put him through that emotional dilemma which scarred him for life), thats basically evil by any standards
But why? Don't people kill animals all of the time? I'm pretty sure a cow doesn't want to die.well, if he asked a man to kill his child (even though he stopped Abraham before he actually went through with it, still ed up imo to put him through that emotional dilemma which scarred him for life
disclaimer: i dont believe in the story of god or abraham tbh, but notice how im just making an argument by accepting the premise. sorta like how we call fictional novel characters good/evil
Just awful logic
How so?
according to christianity, humans arent "just another animal" though. so in the scope of christianity, ordering someone to kill a human is very different.
But he isn't a Christian, he doesn't even believe in God, so how can he say God is evil? And how can he say God is evil for killing children when to him children are animals. He kills animals. So he is evil?
yeah, this is bad logic. neither blake or i believe in god (or at least the christian version). but we are demonstrating that IF the word of the bible is true, there are some very questionable actions on god's behalf which could very well paint him as evil.
i dont believe the character of Agent Smith in the matrix is real... but i think he's evil
But in your eyes it isn't. So how can you claim God is evil if you don't believe in him? Either way, how can God be evil for killing when humans with or without God have killed for a very long time?
you just want to believe the feel good parts of the Bible
It's illogical. Even if the bible is just a story how can a person say God is evil for killing when humans have killed to survive since the beginning of time?
the bible holds humans on a different level than other animals. within that context, god is evil for killing innocent humans
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
