Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 112
  1. #76
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Sure but VIA trade. I'm saying straight up draft. I'm sure if we had lottery picks every year we'd be banking.Then again, one lottery pick is all the spurs ever need
    Uhhhhh....

    This is even more impressive. KL had some question marks.
    Dribbling.
    3's

    Leonard has turned into a genius move. This kid has become so much more of a complete player.

  2. #77
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    As long are we don't overrate him, he's going to be good. Can't wait to watch SlowMo tbh. Watched him (and the whole team) closely since they play all of UCLA's games out here. Even saw him play in person last season against Oakland at Pauley Pavilion. He's going to be a good role player, even with his lack of athleticism.

  3. #78
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    Get readyyy


  4. #79
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    12,323
    Cool.

  5. #80
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    I'm looking forward to Bill Schoening or Bill Land making the pbp call: "And Kyle drives the lane...wait for it...wait for it..."

  6. #81
    Veteran sexinthatsx's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,094
    The only reason I can see why you're overrating the Spurs drafting system is because you're probably still expecting a pick like Tony Parker or Ginobili to come waltzing in the door. Give credit where credit is due - TP and Gino are two players whose careers can never be replicated by any late first round / second round pick in the near future.

  7. #82
    Veteran sexinthatsx's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,094
    71% record as a starter in the NBA.
    Blair was simply the better option as the starting center for the Spurs at the time. If a lump of coal was drafted in the second round, it'd probably end up beating Matt Bonner for the starting spot But in all honesty, Blair was good, but he's nothing spectacular

  8. #83
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    The only reason I can see why you're overrating the Spurs drafting system is because you're probably still expecting a pick like Tony Parker or Ginobili to come waltzing in the door. Give credit where credit is due - TP and Gino are two players whose careers can never be replicated by any late first round / second round pick in the near future.
    Spurs drafted Splitter at #27 in 2007. Spurs drafted Hill at #26 in 2008 and turned him into Kawhi (Finals MVP and NBA All D) and Bertans, who we haven't even seen yet. I think this #30 pick will be just as good.

  9. #84
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    2,142
    Blair was simply the better option as the starting center for the Spurs at the time. If a lump of coal was drafted in the second round, it'd probably end up beating Matt Bonner for the starting spot But in all honesty, Blair was good, but he's nothing spectacular
    No one is trying to over-state Blair's worth. The very fact that he has played at all, same goes for all the others mentioned including even Nando, is that at the positions they were drafted at, players are not likely to make an NBA roster at all. The Spurs are running at a significantly higher probability. Shooting down some on the list as mediocre or poor players misses the point that their counterparts on other teams are often detailing cars, or managing a Burger King instead of playing in the NBA at all, even poorly.

  10. #85
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Blair was simply the better option as the starting center for the Spurs at the time. If a lump of coal was drafted in the second round, it'd probably end up beating Matt Bonner for the starting spot But in all honesty, Blair was good, but he's nothing spectacular
    Blair had PERs over 17 for his first 3 years, and made less than $4M for four years, TOTAL. Hardly a lump of coal, and a bargain, to boot.

  11. #86
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    2,142
    The only reason I can see why you're overrating the Spurs drafting system is because you're probably still expecting a pick like Tony Parker or Ginobili to come waltzing in the door. Give credit where credit is due - TP and Gino are two players whose careers can never be replicated by any late first round / second round pick in the near future.
    I may have missed something. There is a disconnect. I'm not sure where you're getting those impressions from, but the conversation really hasn't even included Tony and Manu much. It was much more focused on more recent draft years, since those two, and what a superb job the front office has done SINCE then, and continues to do, and relative to their draft position how much more likely the player has been to make an NBA roster than an average selection at those positions. There has literally been almost NO talk or NO talk about EXPECTING another Manu to be selected in the late fifties or another Parker near 30. Those are HOF players.

  12. #87
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    2,142
    Blair had PERs over 17 for his first 3 years, and made less than $4M for four years, TOTAL. Hardly a lump of coal, and a bargain, to boot.
    Yup. And he was quite the spark-plug and pain in the ass vs. Dallas this past year, to boot.

  13. #88
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Blair was simply the better option as the starting center for the Spurs at the time. If a lump of coal was drafted in the second round, it'd probably end up beating Matt Bonner for the starting spot But in all honesty, Blair was good, but he's nothing spectacular
    Bonner sucks, it's true. And Blair's no world beater, but the fact remains: He is a good rotation player in the NBA, which is simply very rare for someone picked at his spot. Probably puts him in the top 20 percent of guys picked there.

  14. #89
    Veteran sexinthatsx's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,094
    I may have missed something. There is a disconnect. I'm not sure where you're getting those impressions from, but the conversation really hasn't even included Tony and Manu much. It was much more focused on more recent draft years, since those two, and what a superb job the front office has done SINCE then, and continues to do, and relative to their draft position how much more likely the player has been to make an NBA roster than an average selection at those positions. There has literally been almost NO talk or NO talk about EXPECTING another Manu to be selected in the late fifties or another Parker near 30. Those are HOF players.
    It's not about the lack of mentioning them in this thread as much as it is subconscious thinking that Spurs are always going to miraculously turn draft picks into high quality players. My original message was intended for g_shred. I should've been more clear though

  15. #90
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    2,142
    It's not about the lack of mentioning them in this thread as much as it is subconscious thinking that Spurs are always going to miraculously turn draft picks into high quality players. My original message was intended for g_shred. I should've been more clear though
    Ok, thanks. I was a participant, and I know that wasn't in my subconscious, and I don't think Exstatic or Obstructed View would agree it was in their subconscious, either. I'll admit I lost track of the conversation a bit over the last 24. Take care.

  16. #91
    Veteran sexinthatsx's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,094
    Bonner sucks, it's true. And Blair's no world beater, but the fact remains: He is a good rotation player in the NBA, which is simply very rare for someone picked at his spot. Probably puts him in the top 20 percent of guys picked there.
    I agree, I just wanted to turn the thread into another Matt Bonner bash thread

    But the spot Dejuan Blair was drafted at comes with a caveat: the guy was projected to be a top lottery draft pick until the red flags showed up about him having no ACLs. I think he would've gone no later than 15th without those red flags

  17. #92
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    2,142
    I agree, I just wanted to turn the thread into another Matt Bonner bash thread

    But the spot Dejuan Blair was drafted at comes with a caveat: the guy was projected to be a top lottery draft pick until the red flags showed up about him having no ACLs. I think he would've gone no later than 15th without those red flags
    It is what it is. The Spurs still had the confidence to draft him where others passed. It would be nice to see how many selected before him are no longer in the NBA or never were.

  18. #93
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    But the spot Dejuan Blair was drafted at comes with a caveat: the guy was projected to be a top lottery draft pick until the red flags showed up about him having no ACLs. I think he would've gone no later than 15th without those red flags
    Not sure how that matters. Most every other team had a shot at him and passed, much like the other players we've been discussing. They got huge value for their pick, which is becoming the norm for them.

  19. #94
    tangina ka, though FireMicoHalili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    1,569
    Really great value for Blair at 37, and the Spurs probably eked out the most from him than any other team will. Read somewhere that without ACLs his career doesn't project to be a long one. Spurs got him on the cheap for four years (probably the best stretch of his career). Everything else after would be diminishing returns lest he develop a jump shot, especially in an era where PFs without jump shots have little to no value.

  20. #95
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    2,142
    Really great value for Blair at 37, and the Spurs probably eked out the most from him than any other team will. Read somewhere that without ACLs his career doesn't project to be a long one. Spurs got him on the cheap for four years (probably the best stretch of his career). Everything else after would be diminishing returns lest he develop a jump shot, especially in an era where PFs without jump shots have little to no value.
    All excellent points wrt time-value. Exstatic quoted some dollar values earlier. The Spurs did well with him, value-wise, and you're right, it is err on the side of caution to let him go early. The muscles don't hold the joint together as well all by themselves. Over time, I imagine it like a worn out bushing, and that bone rattling around in there like an auger or pick with more mobility than normal within the space will probably chew stuff up at a faster pace.

  21. #96
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    But the spot Dejuan Blair was drafted at comes with a caveat: the guy was projected to be a top lottery draft pick until the red flags showed up about him having no ACLs. I think he would've gone no later than 15th without those red flags
    It doesn't change the fact that he was an steal at the 37th pick. Players slide all of the time medical related or not. Perry Jones slid to 29th do to his knees being red flagged (he was projected to be a late lottery pick).

    Jared Sullinger was also red flagged due to the back injured he was considered to be a late lottery pick as well.

    The Spurs still took a chance in taking Blair and it worked out very well. He produced like a first round pick and was payed as a second rounder ($3.7 million for 4 season)

  22. #97
    Veteran RD2191's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    51,864
    DJB would probably still be serviceable on the Spurs if he wasn't a huge got, tbh.

  23. #98
    ... scanry's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,962
    By far the Dunk of the year. The missed dunk on Birdman should've been the one tbh.

  24. #99
    ... scanry's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,962
    DJB would probably still be serviceable on the Spurs if he wasn't a huge got, tbh.
    Not really. He was an undersized, no defense/rebounding, shoot happy cancer of a player. In contrast, Banes is much much better. We've actually lacked a banger from 2007-2012 who would just body up teams like in our previous championship seasons.

    1. 1999 - Ellie/J Jackson/Kersey/Rose/Purdue/David
    2. 2003 - Rose/Willis/S Jackson/David
    3. 2005 - Horry/T Mass/Nazr/Robinson
    4. 2007 - Horry/Manu

    We had a very soft team in 2007. Manu actually played very physical that post season. The Utah series got physical and Manu laid them out. The 1999 squad however was by far our scariest team. Not only were tough as nails, we were never able to replicate that defense after that. Much like this years offense.

  25. #100
    Veteran Sean Cagney's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    13,402
    Not really. He was an undersized, no defense/rebounding, shoot happy cancer of a player. In contrast, Banes is much much better. We've actually lacked a banger from 2007-2012 who would just body up teams like in our previous championship seasons.

    1. 1999 - Ellie/J Jackson/Kersey/Rose/Purdue/David
    2. 2003 - Rose/Willis/S Jackson/David
    3. 2005 - Horry/T Mass/Nazr/Robinson
    4. 2007 - Horry/Manu

    We had a very soft team in 2007. Manu actually played very physical that post season. The Utah series got physical and Manu laid them out. The 1999 squad however was by far our scariest team. Not only were tough as nails, we were never able to replicate that defense after that. Much like this years offense.
    That 1999 team was a defensive lovers wet dream! Man that team would shut you down! They would win games 72-65 in that team, the OLD D Spurs! YES SO BORING! LOL. I love defense personally so that team was one of my faves.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •