thanks
was reading that they're trying to figure out if the head shots are indicators that he was surrendering. They said the one exit wound shows a bullet's path from the jaw to collar bone
yeah kids shouldn't be there. I was more interested in why everything started before curfew and why the cops only gave 5 seconds warning. Like, if that's when the molotovs were thrown, or what.
I usually go to reuters for my news. They seem as unbiased as anyone. Here's their page on Ferguson.
http://live.reuters.com/Event/US_Live_Blog
Who wrote all that stuff in red?
Another ME from a site I read.
So the comments are from "tc2k11" on the AR15 forum?
I'm not an expert on autopsies but that was a ty made autotopsy.
You do understand people that post on message boards can also be medical examiners correct?
I understand he is "tc2k11" on the AR15 forum.
Why don't you sign up and ask him what he does for a living. Or better yet why don't you give your expert opinion on the entry exit wounds like he did. I'll provide you the blank autopsy report if you'd like.
No need. He is "tc2k11" on the AR15 forum.Why would that be better for you?Or better yet why don't you give your expert opinion on the entry exit wounds like he did. I'll provide you the blank autopsy report if you'd like.
Would you care to point out any flaws of what he determined from looking at the prelim autopsy report...your expert opinion of course.
It sounds like you don't think he's qualified to give an informed opinion. That leads me to think you see something wrong with it, so what is your take on it or do you not have one?Why would that be better for you?
I merely stated that the opinion is that of "tc2k11" on the AR15 forum. I don't know why it angers you. It's your link.
Your thinking is faulty. I think he is "tc2k11" on the AR15 forum.It sounds like you don't think he's qualified to give an informed opinion. That leads me to think you see something wrong with it, so what is your take on it or do you not have one?
Dispute what "tc2k11" posted, in your expert opinion of course.
I merely stated this is the opinion of "tc2k11" on the AR15 forum.
That is beyond dispute.
How much further beyond is that?
It's metaphorical. There is not a physical distance involved.
Do you understand?
LOL rioting for some got who attacked a cop and got what he deserved for it. I mean I don't like cops either since they don't want to do if your house gets robbed, your car stolen, etc, but charging a cop is count to potato re ed.
Is this your opinion?
But Dr. Baden said that the angle of the bullet through the head can be interpreted as either Brown rushing at him with his head down OR a situation where he was in surrender position with his head down.
Not sure what distance will tell you about it either.
Im no expert but I think it will be tough.
With conflicting accounts between the eye witnesses themselves it makes it that much more difficult.
Judging by the bullet patterns my assumption is that the cop wasn't trying to kill him initially but immobilize him. He had what 3 shots to his arm and one to his right side chest for the first 4 shots? If he wanted to kill him initially I would think he wouldn't be shooting him there. He'd have aimed for his vital organs.
Well, we might never know the truth or what the officer was thinking -\
but if I had to guess -
I would just guess that the officers gun just needs to be adjusted a little as every hit appears to be on the far left side of the body. I would also guess he was aiming for the center.
a game to keep the white supremacists busy
![]()
We're not looters, we're liberators...what a piece of this guy is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)