Reply With Quote
I thought you did not believe in God.
Then how can you say God is anything if you don't believe He exists?
That is truly moronic.
your picks suck and suddenly your picks were really just "opposite picks".
Just stop. Nobody believes you.
I thought you did not believe in God.
Then how can you say God is anything if you don't believe He exists?
That is truly moronic.
you're too much of a sap to realize those gambling magazines are farces. if those "wise guys" knew how to make money, they'd be betting instead of making magazines for pathetic losers to bite on them
Yeah, no he isn't. Dumb .
No actually it's not at all.
Not from any engineering point of view or biological point of view.
In fact the human body itself is full of imperfect design and vestigial structures.
I can go through quite a lot of it if you like.
I knew if I hit 65% 68% .....crickets. Nobody here is going to...great work Avante, so why not just have some fun with it and look at you...STILL...talking about it. If I'd hit 68% nobody would ever taik about it. The fun in it was watching Blake, hahaha!!!!!!!
you're too much of a sap to realize those gambling magazines are farces. if those "wise guys" knew how to make money, they'd be betting instead of making magazines for pathetic losers to bite on them
Why even pretend you've ever even seen one of these gambling mags/books? You are totally completely 100% wrong. These guys are professional gamblers and their plays hiy 65%- 68%. Which is fantastic.
Dude, they have historically strong plays already listed like they always do, those plays alone hit around 60%.
What it is is that you simply don't understand this stuff, you're clueless. Yep...ignorant.
If you just plyed on Seattle as a fav since RW arrived you'd be....18-9, and there are tons of plays that strong out there.
I watched Marc Lawrence go 32-12 on a weekly radio show. Why try and talk about things you know nothing about?
yeah, and thats why you were 4 figures in the red last year
ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!
Actually, everything needed to sustain life is perfect. Distance from the sun, food, fire, things needed to make shelter. Atheists just claim that nothing is perfect because if they did then that would mean it would need a creator. To say the world in order to sustain life is not perfect is stupid.
Anyone who thinks....one....BANG!!!!!!!!!!!!....resulted in a perfect enviornment is one dumb .
the distance from the sun isn't "perfect." the temperatures on Mars can support life as we know it. besides when you consider the sheer number of planets/stars, it would actually be expected for there to be millions of planets with nearly identical conditions to earth.
andat "fire" being a property of earth
Okay then, Mars is the backup. Happened by chance my ass.
We need a particular temp.....we got it.
We need oxygen...yep!
We need food and drink......bingo!
We need medicines....guess what?
A Master Designer who knows all that vs a.....BIG BANG!!!!...man that's a tuff one.
The environment is not perfect.
Either are the organisms that inhabit the environment.
Would you you like some evidence?
Not really.
So you're one of those who thinks this just all happened by chance.....right?
For a rather large time period, there was no oxygen. And when it did form and built up in the atmosphere, it removed a huge number of species of anaerobic bacteria. The face of the Earth changed drastically.
I can take these all on separately if you like.
Obviously talking about the finished produce.
Atheists, took millions ad millions of years for life to get to where it is today. Kind of amazing that nothing went wrong and everything went just right for life to "evolve" successfully.
So why not start with the finished product?
And the product is not finished.
Rob sorry, I got you on ignore.
Well I'm speaking to everyone, not just you.
i guess god was just ing around when he made the other 10^22 planets just for s and giggles then
i'm an all powerful celestial being that is the single cause for life in the universe, and im going to make countless amounts of random large spherical (nearly) blobs throughout this ridiculously large universe... but on just one of them i'll have life, team them my wavs, give them a book, etc.
it seems silly. it made more sense when christianity was young because we weren't aware of just how big the universe was
Where are all the skeletons of creatures in a particlar stage of evolution?
skeletons typically dont remain. fossils are different than skeletons. a vast, vast majority of living things dont leave remains behind and just decompose. only those that died under certain conditions fossilize and are preserved.
also, dinosaurs themselves completely on any biblical timeline
Why mess with Noah's arc since He already knew the outcome? Why part the Red Sea, just zap the bad guys? As we all know so many questions.
Most of the animal phyla that existed on our planet had no skeletons. They were soft bodied and very weird, but we got some really good imprints in the Burgess Shale. And what's cool is we find more all the time. Some huge discoveries have been made recently in China, the work continues.
So you believe all life was created separately, that God made each species on its own?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions