I'm glad you have come to your senses about the IPCC and other alarmists that make claims of how much CO2 will warm the earth.
I prefer one calculated empirically vs model.
I'm glad you have come to your senses about the IPCC and other alarmists that make claims of how much CO2 will warm the earth.
I'm glad to know you've come around to supporting the IPCC's findings then.
LOL...
You are the perfect true believer!
These two notions are not mutually exclusive. Engineering is modeling empirically for example. In fact climate scientists use geometric calculus and systems logic just like engineers in a lot of their models.
I just linked the data stream NASA uses. I know you are familiar with BEST and various other datasets.
FYI
There are three main methodologies that have been used in the literature to constrain sensitivity: The first is to focus on a time in the past when the climate was different and in quasi-equilibrium, and estimate the relationship between the relevant forcings and temperature response (paleo constraints). The second is to find a metric in the present day climate that we think is coupled to the sensitivity and for which we have some empirical data (these could be called climatological constraints). Finally, there are constraints based on changes in forcing and response over the recent past (transient constraints). There have been new papers taking each of these approaches in recent months. - See more at: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php....LqfGtpcl.dpuf
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2013/01/on-sensitivity-part-i
LOL...
Realclimate.
LOL...
Manny uses blogs.
LOL...
After putting some thought into it, I'm not going to post here anymore. The place has become so toxic and full of racisim and nazism that I think my posting here anymore is likely not a good idea as I've never really made a huge effort to keep anonymity. Not that anyone here will miss me, but yeah. Peace out, deniers.
Your climate change posts generally sucked with your overly defensive ty at ude about all things climate related but on other topics you were interesting.
To me, you'll always be the guy who voted for the black guy because he was black, went to the inauguration and left inspired believing there would be change.
Good luck with saving the planet or whatever your next great cause is.
Last edited by SnakeBoy; 08-18-2014 at 10:50 PM.
I will ask that you do not go as I liked the info.
Let him go.
He cannot go toe to toe with me.
Oh really, dip ? You have put me on ignore twice and then say this?
WC is intimidated by the Fuzz.
My placing you on IGNORE is because you are too ing stupid to debate.
Funny cause that is exactly what Manny is saying. I get these are all words here but the saying is "actions speak louder than words."
You're full of and stupid but transparent all the same.
Yet you cannot stand toe to to with me either.
My identifying how you really look at things does not mean that I too look at things the same way. Since you are the one that came up with it, I know you see it too.
You ran from me. Twice.
Maybe if you would stop ting on yourself, I wouldn't run from the stench.
You're pretty funny WC.
Thank-You.
I do go for the laugh from time to time, but I'm serious when it comes to climate issues.
When's the last time he tried to show me wrong?
In case you have signatures off, you should see this:
Expalination of a Climastrologist
"I'm serious when it comes to climate issues."
holy !
World's largest icesheets melting at fastest rate ever recorded - twice as fast as five years ago!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/0...o?detail=email
what was that about a "pause" in global warming?![]()
Yawn...
Yes, we already know the geothermal and volcanic activity is melting western Antarctica. It's part of the "ring of fire," you know.
The loss of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has in the same time span increased by a factor of 3.As for Greenland, can you say "soot on ice?"Scientists did discover that the East Antarctica ice shelf is gaining volume – this gain is not enough to compensate for the larger losses elsewhere.
New Study Provides More Evidence That Global Warming ‘Pause’ Is A Myth
It’s one of the most oft-used arguments put forth by climate deniers: that there has been “no global warming” for the last 17 years, as evidenced by a supposed lack of increase in global average surface temperature.
It’s also one of the most oft-debunked, as overwhelming evidence has shown that most of the heat generated from increased carbon emissions gets absorbed into the ocean, not into the atmosphere. What’s more, scientists believe global temperatures are set to rise rapidly in the face of our increasingly warm and acidic oceans.
Still, the idea that warming has been absorbed more and more by the ocean and not as much by the atmosphere has presented a good question for scientists: Why? Why, even as greenhouse gases have continued to concentrate in our atmosphere, have global air surface temperatures remained somewhat steady for the last several years? And where in the ocean has that heat actually gone?
The answer, according to a study published in the journal Science on Friday, is that much of the heat missing from the atmosphere has been stored deep in the Atlantic Ocean, drawn in by a once slow-moving current that seems to have sped up in the beginning of the 21st century. The sped-up current has been able to pull down heat almost a mile into the ocean, according to the paper’s authors, oceanographer Xianyao Chen of the Ocean University of China and atmospheric scientist Ka-Kit Tung of the University of Washington.
Because of the sped-up current, Chen and Tung say that the North and South Atlantic oceans have been storing more energy than the rest of the world’s oceans combined since the year 2000.
“We found the missing heat,” Chen said, according to a research article published alongside the study in Science.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...ming-atlantic/
The heat is hiding in the ocean. It's going to come out and get us one day.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)