Reply With Quote
officer darrin supporters every time one of their ty scenarios gets debunked
His name is spelled with an "e", btw
Blacks:
Account for:
13% of population
>50% of all murders
> 90% of those victims -- other blacks
Ouch
officer darrin supporters every time one of their ty scenarios gets debunked
His name is spelled with an "e", btw
How many police officers were murdered in retaliation for quelling the Chicago 68 riots with their faces and name plates fully visible.
100?
1000?
My bad, forgot they had the Internet back then.
There was no way to find anyone before the internet?
lol
You can't define it?
Explain to me how someone in 1968 would
1. Obtain all personal information ie: SSN, place of residence, place of birth, employers, banking info, vehicles owned, church attended, family members, family members employers, family members residences etc
2. Distribute said information to ANYONE who wanted it at the click of the button.
You are usually sharper than this and I'm a bit surprised
Why do they need to do all that to get revenge?
You act like people were helpless before the internet.
If they are that afraid, they should probably think twice about what they are doing.
You failed to answer my question. No point in continuing until you do so.
Your premise is false.
You think the internet is the only way anyone could track a person. I understand why you are afraid to continue.
My premise had nothing to do with the way to track someone but the ease to obtain and ability to spread information. Nice try though. You've dodged quite a few questions these days. There is some good going on the live feeds right now, I'd recommend finding a good one.
So you refuse to answer my first question about the Chicago police.
What good is going on?
Give examples.
Answer the question that preceded it.
I've given you the means to see it for yourself, you've chosen not to and keep asking me to provide you with it after being refused again and again. Ask again, see if you'll get a different result.What good is going on?
Give examples.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qTBPtWUJqPM
New procedures for approaching crazy people?
I think so.
We don't know everything here but this appears very wrong. Very.
Sorry if this is a repost.
I realize the police don't know if he is armed but procedures have to change.
We do know everything here. A guy refused to drop his knife, continued at the officers who told him to drop it, and got shot. Next.
pgardn if I asked you to grate your with a cheese grater would you do so?
How about if I asked you to approach police aggressively with a knife in hand asking them to shoot you?
he had a knife and they told him to drop it. the only thing "wrong" with this series of events was that moron's behavior and approach to the situation
Yes if I was a nut.
Jesus you could shoot half the bums in San Antonio if they were liquored up.
Most of the people like this are nuts. They belong in homes.
So you don't see a procedural problem?
I don't like cops one bit and have been wrongfully jailed (passenger of a DUI crash who told the driver they didn't need to take a field sobriety test, jailed for obstructing an investigation and drunk in public---all bull charges that my lawyer laughed at and said this is what happens when you speak) but if you are going to confront an officer with a knife saying shoot me you deserve the outcome.
Nope not one bit.
I said it earlier and I'll say it again. Youtube some police stabbings and then tell me a knife is not a deadly weapon. Ever heard of 21 feet?
The man is nuts.
I will say it again. We could wipe out half the bums that are agitated in this city. Approaching them this way.
Yeah no . He told the crowd he wanted to be shot before the police arrived.
Do half the bums in your city approach police aggressively with a knife refusing orders to drop the knife telling them to shoot them?I will say it again. We could wipe out half the bums that are agitated in this city. Approaching them this way.
And I will say it again. I have seen cops, and have seen for myself very similar situations that were handled very differently. So you drive right up to the man without parking further away and maybe getting some background info from the people who are around?
You just drive right up on the curb on an agitated bum?
Procedures must change.
No because they don't drive up on the curb at them. And I live in SA and have seen this at an HEB handled completely differently. Lots of bums hang out at an overpass near there. Lots of traffic stops and most ask for money. But there are very nutty ones as well.
You don't shoot crazy people because they want to be.
You don't think this could have been handled differently?
Man I guess I am just completely out of touch. I am so glad I'm not a cop in St. Louis. Or a crazy bum.
Agitated bum? Is that what you think he was?
Again with the agitated bum? We've got extremely different interpretations of bums I guess.
Handled differently? Sure. The dip shouldn't continued wielding a knife approaching officers after being told to drop his deadly weapon.
We appear to have a different definition of bums, do we also differ in our opinion of a knife being a deadly weapon?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
