It's sad IMO...
Very wrong, still underrated if anything. No one talks about the near 9 apg or his disgusting clutch stats. This season there was a stat that said something along the lines of if his efficiency in the last minute of ball games was applied to 48 minutes (stretch of a stat, but still) he'd average around 130 a game.
He's a PG so naturally he is very easy to shut down. Especially by Danny Green.
Dude gets his points and still manages to get good shots for his teammates. Gotta like a player who averages 18 points, 6 assists and 4 boards in games where he's "shut down".
Might go down as the greatest shooter in NBA history.
These threads doe.
He's a got. And did his team win?
Easily top ten player in the league.
if anyone is overrated its klay thompson
1-Lebron
2-Durant
3-Davis
4-Paul
5-Howard
6-George
7-Westbrook
8-Love
9-Curry
10-Griffin
Paul? As in Chris Paul? The dude who has never been past the 2nd round? That Paul? Oh and Parker is a better player than both Paul and Curry. Even better than Westbrook. Oh and Kawhi is also better than George. Oh and I'd still take Duncan over Griffin.
6 to 10 are exchangeable.
Yeah, the Chris Paul that season after season posts the best stats by far of any PG in the game. Parker last season had one of the worst postseasons by a "star" winning PG ever, put any of those PG you named on the Spurs and they win it all too. And no, Leonard isn't better than George and Duncan isn't better than Griffin right now, you're being a homer.
You mean the guy who can't get past the 2nd round? That guy is a winner? By your logic Kevin Garnett was a better player than Duncan the last 14 years. Don't let your Manu sucking get it the way of recognizing Parker as one of the best in the game.
Yeah, saying two PGs are better than Parker=Parker not being one of the best in the game.
I'm done arguing with you.
Leonard is better than George on both ends of the floor. Duncan routinely schools Griffin so no homerism here.
Of course you are, because how anyone can claim Choke Paul is a better player than TP is beyond me.
It's easy, just watch the games instead of going the Kobefan route of "counting rings".
As I said before, by your logic KG was a better player than Duncan career wise.
Chris Paul's stats when he got eliminated in the second round: 22.5 ppg, 11.8 apg, 3.7 rpg, 2.5 spg, 51 FG%, 45 3PT%
Those are ridiculous stats b... but he's a choker 'cause he never played with a team as good as the Spurs.
No, 'cause watching the games you can clearly see that Duncan was far more dominant than KG ever was. Even though KG is underrated by most dumbfans because of his lack of rings.
The Spurs have never had an extremely talented team, they just know how to win and not choke under pressure unlike CP3 and his choke gene. I like how you dismiss TPs 2013 run. Damn near carried the team to a le. Much more than CP3 has ever done. Of course he puts up good stats, he's never had a deep playoff run. Always well rested to put up dem stats. I'll take the 4 time NBA champ and Finals MVP.Chris Paul's stats when he got eliminated in the second round: 22.5 ppg, 11.8 apg, 3.7 rpg, 2.5 spg, 51 FG%, 45 3PT%
Those are ridiculous stats b... but he's a choker 'cause he never played with a team as good as the Spurs.
You mean Duncan knew how to win? Just how like Parker also knows how to win.
When the did I do that? And what does that run have anything to do with the things we're discussing right now?
Funny how KG didn't know "how to win" untill he got a good team around him. of a coincidence.
Leonard is better than George? Which George are you talking about? You must mean George Hill? If you're talking about who I think you're talking about then you're smoking something strong.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
