Reply With Quote
cp3 dissappearing act, u know his going to provide defense and defer...same cant be said about enrique where you need to bench his ass to get the message across...
Parker>Paul.
Leonard>George pre injury.
cp3 dissappearing act, u know his going to provide defense and defer...same cant be said about enrique where you need to bench his ass to get the message across...
It's sad to see spurs fan counting rings to rate players like kobestans used to do.
Can be an argument imho. I mean before, when Kobe>Duncan was blatant here because of 5>4, you really couldn't take it seriously as both have won the ship and proved their HOF status but when it comes in choosing between Parker and Paul, I mean the other guy hasn't even gone past the 2nd round yet.
Well when two players are so close statistically rings have to become a factor, as I said before, what separates KG from Duncan?
I'm convinced some of these Spurs fans are mixing Hennessy with Crack. Leonard>Paul George? Seriously? Tony Parker>Chris Paul? Really?! I mean Jesus Christ, I loathe Chris Paul but damn some of you mother ers are blind homers.
What if doesn't come from a Spurs fan? How would you namecall em?
Can statistics back up statements such as Leonard>Paul George or Tony Parker>Chris Paul?
Yes.
Leonard 1
George 0
Parker 4
Paul 0
One of my favorite jump shot forms of all time, in the NBA.
Quick release, low but explosive elevation, no unnecessary hang time and movements, no hitch and flawless shooting mechanics, great balance, great follow through and arc.
awesome form.
Bro TP's and CP3's stats are so close that you cant discount rings tbh. I mean where would you base it?
Here we go once again with the "Cuatro Anillos, Puta!" line of thinking...
So is Robert Horry>Tim Duncan?
After all 7>5...
What does that have to do with individual brilliance?
Jordan didn't get past the second round until late in his career when he had better teammates.
Winning, especially in the playoffs, is a team accomplishment. There are no ifs and buts about it.
I'd much rather have a guy who can quarterback a team into championship contention year after year than have a guy who can put up stats that don't go anywhere...and I bet 100% of GM's/HC's feel the same way.
What are you talking about? Duncan has better per game stats In Both regular season and playoffs. More points, rebounds, blocks, better shooting from the field. Kg is better in assists steal and ft%. And Duncan played less minutes
Duncan also had much better advanced stats than kg in both regular season and playoffs. Ws/48, ws, dws, drtg and ortg.
It really isn't that close.
The reverse is true for Parker and cp3. Cp3 has better ppg, apg, spg and ft%. Parker is better in fg% in less minutes. Advanced stats wise Parker just got destroyed. Cp3 is 64% better in the regular season in ws/48 and 112% better in the playoffs. He has more ws in the regular season than Parker despite playing significantly less games. His drtg is comparable to Parker but his ortg blows Parker's out of the water.
The stats for those two are it even remotely close to close. There's m ore of a chasm between them and between Duncan and kg.
So the spurs are in contention because of Parker's quarterbacking? I swear Duncan, ginobili, Bowen, Leonard and pop, along with all the contributors on the spurs had something to do with it.
I mean, I'm sure if you replace Parker with an in prime john Stockton , the spurs wouldn't have won any championships past 99. If you replace him with an in prime Isaiah Thomas, the spurs can only win two. If you replace Parker with Chris Paul, the spurs wouldn't even get out of the second round because we all know David west is as good as Duncan, and Byron Scott is as good a coach as pop.
It's also puzzling because Parker was very mediocre in 2003, 2005 and 2014, tbh..
To make it perfectly clear, I'm not a Parker hater. I think he's a very good point guard that the spurs were lucky to have. There really weren't that many pg the spurs can replace him with and have the same type of success.
That said, what is going on in this thread is pure insanity.
Hey, Parker is statistically close to Isiah Thomas wrt ppg but has more rings! Parker > thomas. We will just ignore the stats that said Thomas >>>>>> Parker.
Not to defend Choke Paul's embarrassing playoff record and career loserdom, but Enrique has never quarterbacked , he has always been a role player on the Spurs' le teams that had to be bailed out by his backups.... in fact, the years when Enrique really was quarterbacking ended the same as Choke Paul's whole career - in first/second round exits....
Statistics can back up a lot of claims that aren't necessarily true.
Parker hero balled in 2013..Part of the reason why the spurs lost.
Not blaming everything on him obviously, but game 6 was one of the worst hero ball performance i've seen.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
