Sup with dat 2nd law of thermodynamics? tbh
Yes we think the DNA system arose from a simpler RNA system. The evidence is compelling but in science, we are open to new evidence that involves science.
The fact you keep asking the same question over and over again and I keep answering again proves...
Not at all, I just get tired of dummies who totally ignore reality.
I think DNA came from a Master Designer, do you?
God likes to party, tbh. Night is always young.
CAN ANYONE ANSEWRR THIS SIMPLE QUESTION?????????????????????????????????
DID DNA COME FROM A MASTER DESIGNER OR BY CHANCE????????????????????????????????????
Wow~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Does your master designer make mistakes? If so, possibly, but there are better explanations using science. YOUR MASTER DESIGNER. Like I'm supposed to know what that means.
What at attributes does your master designer have, perfection, goal oriented end product, what?
YOUR master designer...
Last edited by pgardn; 08-23-2014 at 09:24 PM.
God likes to party, tbh. Night is always young.
Dude, do you ever just answer a question?
thermodynamics is tough tbh... it was one of the most interesting and most challenging subjects i've encountered. ugh
Googles thermodynamics.
Notice how nobody here can answer this simple question....
Do you think the complexities of DNA just came about by chance?
Amazing.
if the master designer was such a master why would he need to make DNA polymerase to "proofread" errors instead of just creating an error free system? seems like a waste of time. same with mistakes made in mRNA translation.
why would the master designer create viruses? just to with us?
Are you sure about that? Industry averages are between 10 -50 errors per 1000 lines of code.
while "chance" isn't the best word to describe it, i would say yes, long story short. although you have to realize that nobody is claiming that one day things magically happened and BAM we had DNA from nowhere. as pgardn has said, DNA is most likely derived from RNA, a much simpler form of genetic material
You have no idea what that question actually entails, you have already proven that.
And why do you ask this just about DNA? Ask it about a human brain, something much more complex and also imperfect.
You are just chasing your tail.
DNA is also much more stable than RNA. there was probably some developmental mechanism that favored DNA over RNA for this fact.
spurraider my Armenian , what is it that you do and are you using your degree?
It is, but RNA has the capability of playing the duel role of information and enzyme.
It can easily make more of itself in vitro which is absolutely cool.
See there is such good stuff along these lines. The imbedded viral sequences, the psuedogenes... On and on.
I can appreciate music AND the fascination of science. I sincerely wish others could as well.
This is known. I'm speaking more in terms of stability. There are thousands of reactions that can occur with a basic hydroxyl group. I hate speaking teleologically but it's clear more complex biological systems preferred using DNA over RNA for this fact. , even tho DNA exists to be the more stable between the two it still encounters reactions that can be bad for it (leading to mutations of the genome).
Thought you were a scientist? The .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote