His only real goal is to bump the page count on his "record" thread, you know that right?
does the designer have DNA?
did he create himself?
His only real goal is to bump the page count on his "record" thread, you know that right?
watchmaker
Nope I had no clue.
But I got him on ignore now.
Are you ready for me to re-post your humiliation and correction of your "Christian Dogma" blunder where you lumped all religions together as having the same dogma definition?
If it's that important to your contest, go ahead.
I'll just post Webster again.
Go ahead, post your dictionary definition of Christian dogma, which is what you said it was.
I don't think you can.
All you can do is post one of "dogma" which refers to ALL religions.
And then post one of "contest" since that is so important to you you keep bringing it up.
This must be what it is to you.
For me it is merely exposing your blunder.
![]()
That definition applied to all religions. That's the way words work.
It "referred" to all religions, not applied to them.
That is totally ignorant of you to think ALL religions have the same dogma, and a huge blunder to have said it did.
I can go back and re-post where you said that it did.
I never said all religions have the same dogma.
All religions can have dogma according to that definition.
lol you really have problems with the English language, Ivy.
You said it was Christian dogma, and it clearly wasn't because I showed you what Christian dogma was.
So then you countered by saying it was dogma according to the dictionary definition, which again you were wrong because it wasn't dogma either, it was doctrine.
You have no room to criticize anyone but yourself for having problems with the English language, bag.
Of course it's dogma according to the dictionary.
Every religion has contradictions and people agree to ignore them. That's how religions persist.
I love how you are. taking your contest so personally, btw.
Se, you are confused again.
You should go look up "DOCTRINE", it is different than dogma.
You ed up pretty badly, just admit it so you don't keep adding to your humiliation.
I looked up dogma and saw I was right.
Why should I look any further?
Because you are the only one in the whole wide world who thinks you are right.
Everyone else knows the REAL definitions and the difference between the dogma and doctrine when they go and look.
You are the only one who thinks they are the same.
lol speaking for everyone else again.
Pretty arrogant of you. Do you feel you have the right to speak for everyone on the board?
Everyone in the world?
Yes or no.
Trying to deflect won't save you.
Provide your proof, or shut up and go away.
So you admit you do not have the right to speak for everyone on the board.
Good. You're learning.
You might be less arrogant from here on out.
Deflecting the point won't work.
Get back to the point.
Show everyone here your proof.
So you didn't learn you can't speak for everyone in the world?
You need to say once and for all whether you think you can or can't.
As for your demands to continue your contest, I have already done everything I need to All that's left is for you to bitterly complain about your contest.
In three separate threads.
Because it's that important to you.
lol.
For fun I will remind you of your humiliation, your lies about meds, bitterness, and contests, and your dogma blunder wherever I see you post down here and up there.
That should be pretty funny.
Like you've been repeating yourself in these three threads?
I look forward to it.
Get cracking. I've been posting in other forums today.
At my leisure.
And whenever you least expect it.
It only takes once to discredit you.
![]()
.
So evolution doesn't need DNA?
If you knew anything about DNA you would know it's not made up of exploding rocks 12 Billion years agowhich you don't understand
The truth is the discovery of a hidden DNA code so complex the greatest minds in Science are still speechless sealed the fate on Evolution and has exposed the lies.
The debated ended years ago people, now the intelligent ones on this planet must wait for the rest of the Darwin supports minds to Evolve enough to understand it.
And that could take millions of years.
Wrong as usual, both very easy to understand. Why continue to act like they aren't?
You read....Evolution.....wow hard to do.
You read....DNA...wow hard to do.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)