Reply With Quote
not franchise player
bailed from backup
then wat is he?
not franchise player
bailed from backup
then wat is he?
Lol, if that isnt a foul, I dont know what is. That is undeniably a foul.
Plane had mechanical issues and we sat out on the runway for like 6 hours before flying to LA at like 6 AM
TP has played at such a high level for so long. But there is nothing better than a Manu highlight video
Chris Paul does phenomenal things on the court. He's not a phenomenal player though. He folds under pressure, makes stupid decisions, thinks he's better than he is. It's cost him and his team. Tony is just a bit selfish, has a cone for a court vision, sees Tim and Manu, sometimes others but mostly Tim and Manu. He has the ability to follow though, unlike Chris, who has to insert his poor decision making into crucial game moments. Chris seems to have been involved in too many improvisational offensive sets whereas Tony runs plays. Tony has swagger like Chris, but Tony's is tempered with the understanding that he's only a piece on the team and Pop calls the shots. Chris thinks and has been told that he is the team.
I never said it wasn't a foul. I'm making the argument that this was not an "obvious" foul (Especially when you view it in real time), which is why the refs decided to not let Barry win this game on what would have been a cheap call.
imo not giving the foul is a cheap call. by allowing that sort of contact you are literally eliminating the guy's chance to make a shot, while rewarding bad defense. if fisher merely grazed him i wouldn't care, and then i'd agree with the no call in that situation, but that was some serious contact
I'm willing to agree to disagree with you bro. I do think it was a foul, but I don't think that it was serious contact that should have decided the game. Look at it in real time.
Yeah, good luck making a shot when someone hits their elbow into your head and your dodging under them with 1 second left, give me a ing break, he couldnt get a clean look, his odds of hitting a shot with Fisher running into him is 0%
The Barry/Fisher situation is a prime example of how the double standard exists with the NBA refs, media and fans. If the shooter goes up and forces the foul to be called, it's considered a cheap move. If he doesn't go up, he loses the game because the defender jumped on top of him.
Barry should have taken the shot regardless, because refs are pressured to call shooting fouls more than non-shooting fouls. By not doing so, he basically gave up. Like Erin, the ball was with the wrong guy. It should have gone to Manu.
Yeah. Tyson Chandler's foot injury in Game 5 was a killer. Before the injury, Hornets weren't doubling on Duncan. However Chandler was limited in Game 6 and 7.
Hornets had no bench and no one who could consistently create their own shot especially after West hurt his back in Game 5. Peja was non-existent and Pop putting Parker on Paul in Game 3 was a great move since Bowen was getting destroyed by CP3.
That game 7 loss was the worst loss I ever experienced and only the 2011 Saints loss to the Niners comes close to matching it. In retrospect it wouldn't have mattered since the Lakers would have dominated the Hornets especially with a hobbled Chandler and West.
If anything they could have called it on the floor and not in the act of shooting. Since LA was in the penalty, Barry would have 2 FT's to at least tie the game.
Good no call by the refs.
So you must be the kinda guy that thinks Derick Fisher got the shot off in 0.4 seconds. off troll
we're always getting robbed
And WTF is that supposed to prove?
You know your team is in a bad situation when your best player is outplayed by the opposite team's 3rd
That you should bow down to your daddy and stop trollingAnd WTF is that supposed to prove?
welp
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions