Reply With Quote
CURRENT AVANTE BETTING TRACKER: 0-3, -$330
.....just this one thread then I'll get back to mine.
Guys....SLOW THE DOWN...ok? ONE...like...ONE... ing week ok?
Stop the stupdity over....ONE..like in...ONE...week, ok?
Never seen so many ..ROOKIES..in my life....wow~!
Do I really need that...LONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG..l ist of teams that sucked in week one or..WOW!..in week one where the sucky had a great season and the WOW! ended up sucking?
Damn~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CURRENT AVANTE BETTING TRACKER: 0-3, -$330
Right there a perfect example of some dumb kid freaking out over....ONE...week.
Come on people stop acting like a bunch of deranged high school kids...alright.
Long season, week one will mean very little. This isn;t the NCAA.
singing a familiar tune
Can you shut the up already and stop spamming your excuses? You're 0-3, end of story....
I;m not talking about betting shorty, why not actually read the thread ok asshole?
Like talking to a kid...
Not talking about me, I;m talking about all this silliness over..one..game.
listen slugger, you're currently sitting pretty at 0-3. that's it, and that's all.
That's 0-3 talking...
Avante
People people, hahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look, don't over react to....A....game, ok? It's.....ROOKIE!
Just last season the ans start off 3-1, would end up 7-9.
In 2012 the Redskins start off 1-4 and would end up 10-6.
Give things some damn time.
Last edited by Avante; 09-09-2014 at 04:34 AM.
All I got out of week one was this....
By coming back vs a better team Cleveland showed they are heading in the right direction.
Raiders....still..can't win on the east coast.
Cowboys still suck on defense.
Chiefs won't be winning nine in a row this season.
E.J.Manuel makes a big difference.
Geno Smith is dumb.
RGIII won't be starting by seasons end.
Terrance West appears to be the real deal.
The Pats goofed letting Mackins go.
But.....not going to "over react".
my dog is 2-1 on your games tbh
All I got was that you're 0-3.
So there is no way I can pull myself out of this hole?
of course you can but trends are showing us it is very unlikely
So you don't buy my 110-64 trend?
I'm just referring on the trend we are following on this board tbh
and this trend is not very good to put it nicely
Why isn;t the trend very good? Do you really think the five best ATS teams the last two seasons who all look to be as good this season will lose more ATS plays than they win?
Already...3-0-2
Denver alone...22-13-2 since Peyton, they are going to all of a sudden start losing ATS?
Let me see the hands of those who think Denver/Niners/Seattle/Indy/Cinncy....will lose more ATS plays in 2014 than win as a group?
let me see if i can find posters you think avante.... will lose more ATS plays in 2014 than win
Well since Avante is going to simply play...Den/Sea/Cin/Niners/Ind...each and every week........hmmmm? If Avante had used that system last week....3-0-2.
Avante, I've come around to your posting style, but you realize you've went through this same line of reasoning for the past three seasons right?
Done with the past.
This system can't fail, it has gone about 55-32 the last two seasons. It's already 3-0-2.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
