He's not one of the four. Supposedly, there will be four players who have ratings ABOVE 90 (like 91+). Duncan is fifth, then or tied for that spot.
I also have no idea why Ayres' rating got better. He looked worse this past season than he did with the Pacers.
He's not one of the four. Supposedly, there will be four players who have ratings ABOVE 90 (like 91+). Duncan is fifth, then or tied for that spot.
lebron, durant, westbrook, davis?
Nvm then
LeBron, Durant, Paul and Westbrook are probably the 4... I am sure that the first 3 are, not so sure bout Brick.
The other thing noticeable is the Boris adjustment, which is understandable, given his Finals series... Bonner, on the other hand, WTF?
He's overrated, but he was underrated previously. He should probably be like a 68-69. But he's significantly better than Daye and Ayres, so the ratings had to reflect that. Honestly, the deep bench is a little overrated, and the shallow bench is underrated.
What is Wade rated now?
He'll be above 90 by year 2-3 in career mode. As long as guys like Kyrie / Rondo don't continue to be rated well above him.
Idk about these ratings, do we even know if they're legit? Why wouldn't Kyle Anderson be in yet? Bc I saw a rookie ratings video and he already had his rating (like a 67). I do think Bonner is skilled enough to inflate a video game rating. He's a great 3 point shooter, smart player, good on defense positioning-wise. The only thing that cuts him back is the fact that he's got short arms and is really unathletic. I don't think that should effect his rating as much so as his actual in game play.
Bonner +15? Dafuq?
He's even the King of 2K Plus/Minus.![]()
The ratings evolve for anyone with an internet connected console or PC, so the ratings don't mean that much..But damn, anyone at 90 or above is superstar status in the 2K series![]()
90 is pretty good for Duncan, also 85 for Leonard
i would give Tony 87 and Manu 84 though,
For years and years and years I remember getting pissed at 2k for constantly underrating Tim Duncan. To see him FINALLY get a rating he deserves is awesome. I cannot wait to get this years game. I wont even have to edit him! Haha
IMO Duncan 88, Parker 89, Kawhi 87 , Manu 85
imagine what happens to Laker Nation if Kobe gets ranked an 89. Highly unlikely though, betting he's at 90 as well.
Only 4 players are 90+, so no way Kobe is one of them before Chris Paul, Melo or even Harden.
Should be rated 83 as Manu tbh.... But he'll probably get a 85/86.
Kobe should be ranked about 62 based on his play last season.
As usual, people are too focused on the overall rating and not focused enough on the ratings in individual categories. Duncan being rated a 90 isn't because they consider him a top five player necessarily, it's because he still does so many things well, that's there's only a few categories he's not going to rate at least decently in.
In that same vein, the Ginobili drop is explicable, especially on the heels of a bounce back season.
Parker too high, Kawhi too low
It's a different rating system than last year, guys. Comparing the increase/decrease from this year to last year is pointless when they use a different rating system.
Each position has it's own set of formulas for calculating overall ratings.
In the case of Bonner, his rating increase is based on his specialist skill (3pt shooting, in which he's one of the best in the league at his position). It also only compares him to other PF's ONLY, not SF's like Leonard or PG's like Mills or Joseph. I posted an article from one of the developers on pg 1 of this thread where he explains the new rating system...
How can Manu get an 87 or whatever he got after the '13 season and just an 83 after last season?
To the guy who said "Imagine if Kobe gets an 89":
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/lakers-...150830096.html
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)