Reply With Quote
Stat/trend play of the week....
Denver minus the number.
Since Manning showed up at home vs KS....65-20, or..32-10. Denver as a HF with Manning...12-4, KC as RD 4-7.
Now who can make any case at all for KC?
Ok starting Sunday I will be taking.....Denver, Niners, Seattle, Indy and Cinncy every single week. I might add a few plays that look good. Will probaly take Niners to cover at home vs Sea and vice versa in Seattle.
I will post the line but if something happened and I failed to post that week they are my plays. This computer is on it's last legs.
It's a time proven system the one I started using about five years ago, it's not as much about winning as it is ....how much will I win? Just the last two years an average,...55-32.
Stat/trend play of the week....
Denver minus the number.
Since Manning showed up at home vs KS....65-20, or..32-10. Denver as a HF with Manning...12-4, KC as RD 4-7.
Now who can make any case at all for KC?
Yeah. You went against them. Trends show that it makes them a good pick.
Ok then you'll jump at this obviously.
I'll simply play...Den/Niners/Indy/Cinncy/Sea.....week in and week out. You take the opposite side, no doubt I suck at this so you'll jump at that....right?
The loser is history, yep, gone.......deal?
i have plenty of money on my picks, and i'll continue to post them here. i'll give additional thought/weight to picking the opposite of you and apply that to my picks. i'll post them all on this forum
but why would you claim to be a betting expert if your master plan is just to bet on the big favorites?
Being a betting expert is finding what wins you $$$$$$. You saw what I was talking about last week, did it go as I said it would? Yep, Raiders can't win on the east coast, Cleveland can't beat Pitt in Pitt. I know.....came up 3.5 short on the number. But you saw what I said you would.
When you know which teams suck ATS in Sept/Oct etc, win ATS on Monday/Sunday/Thursday night and understand money management, yep.....expert.
Now since I always get it wrong, so just bet against me, we have my deal......right?
No no.....I suck so just bet against me....didn't you say that? Ok then back your up. You go opposite of me, ....easy money....you said that. So we have a deal...right?
Ok so who wil step up and take my deal? Remember......just bet against Avante...ok do it.
I have....Den/Niners/Indy/Cinncy/Sea....every week, all you do is take the other side, remember...."just pick against Avante".
Ok so if you beat me I;m history, if I beat you....see ya?
, this should be easy, I don't know about this.
I'd think everyone would jump at this deal, what happened?
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....bu nch of ing cowards. Not a nut on any of you....0-3 haha~~~
It's silly to promise my picks for games weeks from now. I might be taking some bad lines, there could be injuries, etc. I goin a week to week basis
It doesn't matter what the line is, this is a system I;m talking about that has averaged...55-32, the last two seasons and is at 3-0-2 right now. You said...."just bet against Avante"...right? Ok then prove that, just bet against those five teams I'll be playing, you can't lose......remember?
So we have a deal?
What happened to....."just bet against Avante's picks"....hmmmmmmm?
You are taking that statement way too literally.
What's happened is I finally decided to seriously play and everyone has seen that system and knows it's going to work. So it's.....ah well, ah.....hahahaha!!!!!!
Watch as nobody takes me up on that deal?
Facts
Since Harbaugh showed up...
Niners ATS....33-19-3
Since Manning landed in Denver ATS....
22-13-2
Since Luck showed up in Indy ATS...
22-13-2
Since RW showed up in Seattle ATS
27-11
Last two Cinncy seasons ATS....
20-13-2
Now who sees that changing dramatically in 2014?
The there's GB......33-21...three years prior to 2013 with Rodgers out.
Anyone curious about your team ATS, it's all right here. Doesn't matter what role they are playing.
Last edited by Avante; 09-10-2014 at 06:43 PM.
Da Raiduhhhss.
No real need to go back further than two seasons.
The Raiders ATS
Home fav....2-4
home dog....3-4-1
Road fav...3-6-1
road dog...7-7-1
as we can see there is no "role" the Raiders have shined in. No logical reason to ever play them ATS.
Oh, I don't care about betting--I just wanted to interject with Da Raiduhhhssss. Carry on your betting ways, sir.
Advice....
Unless you are playing in some contest that requires you play all the games ATS, you don;t look for lines, you look for 'spots" where one team excells playing a team that sucks in that "spot", yep....homework. The line doesn't matter.
You will only find 3-5 of those games a week or less. Your job is to find them/
Worked great for you last week.
Well hopefully in the next.....20....weeks I can make it up....hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
No thought what so ever of the next 20 weeks or so, what a dummy.
I show this dummy a 110-64 system and he's too dumb to figure it out, wow~~~~~~~~
I'm good with picking against the overrated teams like the Giants and rams w/ bradford
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
