This narrative?
Would would anyone pay attention to your narrative when it is filled with failures like this above.
The autopsy you are referring to was done by Shawn Parcells, Baden gave his opinion on it only to lend it credibility. Some are saying he wasn't even present during the autopsy. Baden was unaware Parcells is not licensed to do autopsies, the medical community is furious Parcells is practicing without a license and misrepresenting himself. Parcells was hired by the Brown family. The unlicensed Parcells gave his unlicensed opinion of the autopsy on National television. Think about that for a minute.
The chief medical examiner of St. Louis county Dr. Mary Case performed the first autopsy of Michael Brown, she said what Parcells did was abysmal. "He is doing forensic autopsies that may send someone to prison, and he is not a physician, much less a forensic pathologist"-Dr. Mary Case
This narrative?
Ferguson’s massive cover-up: How police departments are protecting Michael Brown’s killer
http://www.salon.com/2014/09/14/ferg...browns_killer/
its looking like another Zimmerman story where prosecutors know they don't have a winning case, and its basically just public pressure
You Lie. The FL prosecutor simply didn't to convict Z, was intentionally incompetent. Plenty of prosecutors pointed at all kinds obvious stuff that prosecutors could have done differently. Then there is the judge's jury instructions skewed badly by the gun fellators' and NRA s SYG law.
In Ferguson, the prosecutor and PD are most probably colluding extremely closely to get all their stories straight, doing everything they can, NOT to indict Wilson, esp letting time pass for the national spotlight to move on.
you are a political caricature
According to the Associated Press, the autopsy concluded that Hunt was shot “numerous times, all from the rear.”
“This is consistent with statements made by witnesses on the scene, who report that Darrien was shot to death while running away from police,” family attorney Randall Edwards said in a statement. “It would appear difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile these facts with a story that Darrien was lunging toward the officers when he was shot.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/blog/2014...e+Raw+Story%29
Milwaukee cop won’t be charged despite video proving she lied about seeing illegal strip searches
Milwaukee police officers who were being investigated for obstructing an inquiry into illegal cavity searches will not be facing charges, The Journal Sentinel reports.
Last month, a jury awarded Leo Hardy more than half a million dollars after it determined that Officers Michael Gasser and Keith Garland Jr. “maliciously,” and with “reckless disregard” for his Hardy’s civil rights, subjected him to an illegal strip and cavity search.
However, that verdict hinged not on the manner in which the search was performed — it was rendered because the officers lacked probable cause to initiate the search in the first place.
It is but the first of over 60 such cases against the Milwaukee police currently in the works.
In the latest related investigation, Officer Stephanie Seitz told investigators that she had not witnessed any of the alleged searches, even though in one of the videos obtained by the prosecution, she can clearly be seen standing a few feet away from an illegal strip and cavity search.
When prosecutors discovered this video that contradicted her sworn testimony, they initiated a perjury investigation. The prosecutor’s office determined that she had been “clearly untruthful” when she claimed not to have seen a fellow officer remove drugs from a man’s rectal cavity.
Police spokespeople said that the video alone — in which she can be seen “looking directly at” another officer as he performed an illegal search — was not enough evidence to prove that her lying hampered the department’s investigations into the strip and cavity searches, however.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/blog/2014...trip-searches/
You lie. The Zimmerman case had nothing to do with the SYG law as he claimed basic self defense.
Has it ever occurred to you that Wilson was telling the truth?In Ferguson, the prosecutor and PD are most probably colluding extremely closely to get all their stories straight, doing everything they can, NOT to indict Wilson, esp letting time pass for the national spotlight to move on.
The judge's OBLIGATORY INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY were completely different under FL SYG vs without SYG.
Wilson's a cop, he's lying, and FPD is lying, too.
the case had nothing to do with SYG.
So far the only people we know that have lied have been from Brown's side. Dorian Johnson, the 4 eyewitnesses who changed their stories once the autopsy report came out, and Shawn Parcells, who was hired by the Brown family and lied about his qualifications and is not licensed to perform autopsies.Wilson's a cop, he's lying, and FPD is lying, too.
You realize that jury instructions are drafted and negotiated by counsel, not the judge, right?
Errm, meant the charge. Jury instructions are standard boiler plate.
jury instructions must conform to, eg, the FL SYG law. GZ didn't have to claim SYG. He murdered TM
True, but irrelevant. The prosecution had a role in drafting the charge, so why are you blaming this on the judge?
Ferguson’s massive cover-up: How police departments are protecting Michael Brown’s killersalon.com
Basic evidence is being kept from the public. And investigators aren’t showing proper zeal to figure out the truth
I urge everyone to read this. It’s a long read, so I’ll point out a few things.
The Ferguson Police department has delayed and directly denied access to do ents that are required by law to be made, required by their own written policy to be made, and are required by state and federal law to be public.
Among them is the Incident Report, and the Use of Force form.
- The Incident Report was said to not be needed.
- When faced with why that’s a lie, the police department responded that officers don’t have to fill out an incident report due to the 5th amendment.
- When told Darren Wilson would have to official invoke that right, they admitted he hadn’t.
- When they did finally turn over an Incident Report, it was missing legally required information, in fact all it had was a date, location, and time.
- When told that more information was required, they returned an Incident Report with all of the information filled out, but then redacted (blacked out) all the way back to date, location, and time.
There is no proof any Use of Force form was ever filled out. Or any evidence that the Incident Reports sent in were ever filled out by Darren Wilson. There is no proof in fact that legally or policy required procedure was followed.
At the very least they have already admitted by their own policy that Darren Wilson has committed a fire-able offense by not filling out the paperwork. But he has not been fired, he is on paid leave, no charges have been placed, and no reprimand or penalty on his job has been enacted.
And let me go back to the bold, they tried to use the defense that Darren Wilson didn’t have to write down what happened BECAUSE IT WOULD INCRIMINATE HIM.
Oh my GOD! A FORM wasn't filled out!!!!!!
Yet Zimmerman was tried... the threshold to indict isn't really that high. Just surprising we've not heard so far what the prosecution theory is... after all, you would think they're presenting it to the grand jury...
he was only tried after months of public pressure tbh. but yeah i'd agree the prosecution is being pretty lethargic in mizzou
Bump for the updated FuzzyLumpkins narrative.
half the links you post on this forum are fake articles and they all have that same stupid font so I usually don't even bother.
You Lie
trash talking fonts, and a really nasty one like ... Arial !![]()
I'm not saying that one is but you are always posting articles from sites similar to the onion.
I saw this thread at the top and was hoping FuzzyLumpkins graced us with more of his false narratives to tear apart.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)