Lol "let's see how [insert year here] goes, ok?"
That happened to me in a number of college games already. I'm not complaining.
What's the Baylor game got to do with anything here
Lol "let's see how [insert year here] goes, ok?"
It sucks doesn't it when you know you had the right side?
You remember me telling you that Baylor has never failed to cover a spread that big? Yep, easy!
Dude, be cool....can ya do it?
I always get a kick out of dumb white guys weeping and moaning over the fact we can't run. When it's SOOOOOOOOOO damn obvious.
Right now the NFL has..."one"...speedy/quick white running back in Danny Woodhead. Since 1960 there have been about.....hmmmm?....around a dozen white backs that made an impact...a dozen. That's how lopsided this is. We could say the same thing (a few more here) for receivers. That's sad.
You all know I'm a track guy first and a football freak second.
There has never been a Mexican, Asain run a sub10.00 100m, and only Frenchman Christophe LeMaite has done it as far as white guys go. Now look at tiny Trinidad, that tiny island....Darrel Brown, Marc Burns, Kleston Bledman, Ato Boldon, Richard Thompson....all black, all ran a sub10..00. , TCU has had seven black sub10.00 sprinters among the alum.
Then there's that....size with speed combo only seen in black athletes. Usian Bolt is 6-5, Calvin Johnson is 6-4, Herchel Walker/Bo Jackson/Marcus Dupree all over 220 pounds all blazing fast.
We see a big white back like John Rggins***, Peyton Hilis. Larry Csonka.....slow!
*** Riggins was fast at around 210 pounds in HS, a 9.8 guy.
Last edited by Avante; 09-16-2014 at 06:23 PM.
quit claiming "the system" as yours if you refuse to play it. you are 2-5 PERIOD. if you want to talk about some genius system, put your money on your mouth is and make those plays every time. otherwise you are 2-5, that is it and that is all
Whatever you say, you're the boss, hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Both NO/Indy have season defining games this week, they cannot go 0-3. While their opponets Vikings/Jags are going nowhere.
The Saints "finally" at home. The Colts in a "must win" situation, will lay the points.
Yeah I put $50 on Baylor before you said anything.
No idea what this has to do with anything.
your "system" is but you are 2-5.
I agree both should win, but the spread determines if it is good to bet.
Are you new at this? It sure appears that way.
Give things some time, ok? Don't act like a little immature kid..ok?
Lot of footbal left to play...honest!
That's not true at all. If you think a team can win the game outright if going with a favorite you ignore the number, You do pay attention to the number when playing dogs.
You never try and play..."I think we'll win but not by that much". Those oddsmakers rarely make a mistake.
Just trying to talk to your dumb ass, my mistake. Dude, you really are just a little prick, huh?
Look at where that has gotten you with Denver this year.
And actually, if you think the Underdog will win, then it might make sense to not care about the number since them winning automatically means they cleared the number.
We can't ignore the fact Wes Welker isn't there.
Betting the NFL is all about odds. If you'd bet on Denver since Manning showed up you'd be....22-14-2. You don't...well after -two weeks..... they were 1-2 after three weeks in 2012 ATS, ended up...11-6. After 8 weeks in 2013...4-3-1 then went 7-3.
I see nothing to think they can't do something similiar, do you?
I rarely see an underdog getting points where I think they'll win the game. So that's where your homework comes into play.
How do they do vs that number?
Give things some time.
I'm trying to have an intelligent conversation with you. My mistake.
Who's gonna be the last unbeaten? My money might be on Cincy. Crazy, but Denver's got a brutal schedule, I have no faith in Philly, not sure Houston is that good given their season last year, and no one else is that impressive.
Cinncy should beat Tennesee then a bye week and then....at New England. So how do they play coming off a bye on the road....I don't have that stat. If they do get by the Pats then here comes Carolina/Indy/Baltimore....no way they make it past the four just mentioned undefeated.
I see Denver getting beat in Seattle this week, the Seahawks at home coming off a loss.......a tough "spot" for any team.
Arizona has lost to the Niners in Arizona the last two seasons, now the Niners are coming off a loss. Teams heading into bye weeks...hmmmmm? Arizona heading into a bye week.
Last edited by Avante; 09-17-2014 at 11:20 AM.
Anyone talking Texas Tech is trying to have an intelli.........hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!
Blake talking about his alma mater is "dumb"? I know TTU isn't up to the hallowed standards of College of the Sequioas, but come on![]()
I'm a Niners fan as you know. But do you see me getting silly with it? We aren't as good as the Seahawks right now because RW is far better than Kaepernick. You keep it real, not ....I went there, so...or..I like, so. We see rookies play that.
Would you believe COS has an NFL player better than anyone who ever came out of TT?
It doesn't work that way. Because you are dealing with five teams playing a minimum of 16 games each. You are only interested in the end results.
It's 2012, after two weeks ATS
Cincy...0-1-1 ended up...9-7-1
Denver...1-1 ened up...11-6
Indy..1-1 ended up...10-6-1
Niners..2-0 ended up...10-8-1
Seattle..1-1 ended up...13-5
So the five started off....5-3-1
They ended up...53-32-3
2013 first two weeks
Cincy...1-0-1
Denver..2-0
Indy...0-2
Niners...1-1
Seattle...2-0
Started out...6-4-1
Ended up ATS
Cincy..10-6-1
Denver...11-7-1
Indy....11-7
Niners...12-6-1
Seattle...13-6
So...57-32-3
So all that is going to "dramatically" change in 2014?
So a 110-64-6 is going to become a loser a year later?
Last edited by Avante; 09-17-2014 at 12:42 PM.
Then as usual you'd be wrong.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)