Reply With Quote
Were you objectively chanting BIG12 BIG12 back then too?
Lol all time
Were you objectively chanting BIG12 BIG12 back then too?
I did support Okie St going to the le game over Bama that season. Bama only had one quality one all year against Arkansas and lost their other quality game at home to LSU.
But I don't have to cheerlead for the Big 12 on this forum since its mostly SEC hate.
SEC does not even play all teams in Conf.Not sure how anyone can complain about scheduling when you compare these two
South Carolina
Arkansas
MSU
Ole Miss
Alabama
Auburn
Mizzou
LSU
SEC Championship
______________
Kansas
Baylor
OU
Iowa State
Kansas State
Tceh
West VA
OklaState
TCU
Bad comparison. And the East is just not very good.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&highlight=sec
Geaux SEC SEC
Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaap
lol having to play in Waco Lubbock Ames Stoolwater
I was just comparing A&M's conf schedule vs Texas' conf. sched.
Don't forget Manhattan and Lawrence.
No reason to do that.
Texas is just not very good. They will have problems with almost any schedule this year. New QB, no offensive line, their D will get worn down in the Big 12. Watch for more injuries on D with a bunch of guys playing tired. Already lost starting DT last game. I would almost rather have Texas playing SEC teams that don't mix it up on offense. Texas has got to have the most 3 and outs on offense in the Big 12.
A&M's schedule hasn't had a P5 opponent OOC since joining the SEC. That needs to change.
I wasn't trying to compare teams. Was just responding to dumbjohn knocking our schedule.
A&M had trouble finding opponents on such short notice. Schedules are usually set years in advance. When they moved conferences it made it hard to find suitable opponents with the same open weeks. A&M had Arky every year non-conf but that became a conference game. A&M would have gladly kept the Texas game on T-Day but they declined. Either way, A&M has Arizona State, UCLA and Oregon all on the books in the next few years.
What hurts them is no Big 12 team will schedule them due to politics after leaving. They have to settle for Pac-12 opponents or try to get an ACC team to come to Dallas or even them going to Atlanta .
A&M plays enough games in Texas with home games and non conf games against the "others" in the State. I think they would much rather continue to get exposure in the south or out west when playing non-conf opponents. You see Texas doing the same thing.
Florida St/Miami/Georgia Tech would be good opponents since Florida and Georgia are deep every year in recruiting.
Or scheduling a neutral site game in Atlanta against an ACC foe.
No reason to change it
Yeah that's false.
Gotta love the whole "SEC is the best conference by far" schtick when it has been dominated by.one or two teams.
Texas should play ATM, and that is basically UT's fault.
Travesty that game is off. Absolutely wrong for fans and both schools. Totally sucks.
A&M left out of butthurt. That's basically A&M's fault.
A&M left because it was the best decision for the University. If you can't see that now you're blind. A&M has never had this much exposure, made this much $, or been this successful on the field and recruiting. It's not a coincidence all these things started to happen when the school left behind Texas and the big12.
We hold no animosity towards anyone for how it went down. Why would we? We are major beneficiaries of how everything shook out.
Giving up natural in state rivals is never in the best long term interest of a school unless it's a move up.
This was a butthurt sideways move.
Texas would have easily left for the PAC-12 if it benefitted them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
