the goods, thanks for the reply
Yeah, but thats better than having 5 point guards/combo guards like they had in those dreadful years (my opinion).
the goods, thanks for the reply
It does take of business for this year and preserves options going into next summer.
No, you're missing a place value.
Eh. I get where you're coming from. But I think in today's NBA, you can get away with having a lot of PGs. That's especially true if at least one's a big PG like De Colo was. I don't think there will ever be a use for four "true" centers outside of injury. The days of a guy like Duncan getting away with playing minutes at SF are over.
Well, I think that no matter how the Spurs had to go about categorizing the Baynes signing, a one-plus-one deal would have made the most sense for them. They could have done that with the LLE as well. But I agree that that wasn't what Baynes wanted. But the Spurs gave him the APY he wanted, so I think he should have been able to meet them halfway on that.
It would have been interesting if teams and players started to agreeing to "mutual options" kind of like they have in baseball. Give a player a PO for a non-guaranteed year (with a guarantee date almost immediately after the option deadline). That would give maximum flexibility for both sides.
I like scotch.
Yeah, I think when they want to, every Spur is a PG (like the Finals) so they will take it easy some months but if they want to repeat this season the overall seed is the big fundamental I almost can see Cleveland overhyped and overhelped getting a free 1st seed in the East.
2.077 can be rounded to 2.1
i dont care for sig figs in this sort of setting
Those made me hate the first couple of weeks of chemistry.
Maybe the APY was never an issue. We'll probably never know what the initial offers were from each side on July 1st.
I said something stupid. I wasn't paying attention, and was thinking what Mel or Chinook said earlier that they would want to keep the BAE in tact, so it wouldn't be true, but it was.
Don't worry, you're in good company, several chemistry Phds don't understand them very well, either. Or, have long since forgotten them by the time they're asked to teach them.
I had actually assumed the bold was true initially. The Spurs had the money to spare because their stars took less. It wouldn't make sense to lose a player they wanted over such a small amount. Regardless, the Spurs came up from the QO even though we have no reason to think they needed to. Even if they were happy to do that, it was still a concession on their part.
We also have no idea who wanted how long. Maybe it was Baynes who wanted a prove-it deal while the Spurs wanted to lock in a cheap center for 2015.
I think when it comes down to it, many of us read drama into the situation that simply wasn't there. It seems like the two sides had a contract worked out, and Baynes just wanted to see if he could get a better deal than SA was giving him. He couldn't, so he came back. Both sides did their due diligence. I doubt there's much bad blood between the two parties.
Bellineli is going to play backup PG minutes while Patty is out. You don't have to like it or agree with it, you just get to sit back and say 'damn you Nono'. Just watch![]()
Buenas, Nono. When did they get internet in Argentina? Anyway, I think Baynes admits he wanted more than a one year deal in the Jabari Paker interview with Baynes, today. That link is floating around here somewhere.
or Pop will stop holding Duncan back
I posted that 8 hours ago, tbh...
Eric Pincus ✔ EricPincus
Though told Baynes signed via MLE - Spurs shoul have had Early Bird Rights - may not have needed to use exception at all - looking into it
P, if you're actually wondering about what Pincus wrote, we answered that question up top. Glad to know I wasn't the only one wondering.
And kudos to Mel_13 for calling the MLE. It definitely makes the most sense. The Spurs still have more than $3 Million to spend if they see a free agent or European buyout they want to pursue.
Glad he is back and happy that this novel is over !
Even better! But, then why you think it inconclusive he didn't want more years and Spurs want one? He is questioned about that in video and seems to answer that it was the case.
Jeebus: Your signature is not only offensive, it's also pathetic you ignorant .
Just turn sigs off. I haven't had them turned on in years.
what is it, i can't see it for some reason
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)