Reply With Quote
Even for a teenager this schtick would be pathetic.... For an old head like him shhhh
can you believe having like 45-50 and coming with that kind of stuff... Dear god
As long as you acknowledge your mocking of God.
Thanks for acknowledging your mocking of God!
Even for a teenager this schtick would be pathetic.... For an old head like him shhhh
can you believe having like 45-50 and coming with that kind of stuff... Dear god
How is it that you think you know as an authority of what is or what isn't, MY mocking of God, or even of Gods' conception of His being mocked?As long as you acknowledge your mocking of God.
Thanks for acknowledging your mocking of God!
You are biting off more than you are able to chew, sounds like to me.
Thank you for your ridicule, you are forgiven it, for you know not what you say!Even for a teenager this schtick would be pathetic.... For an old head like him shhhh
can you believe having like 45-50 and coming with that kind of stuff... Dear god
Nor are you aware of the "significance" involved in what you misunderstand to be and thus perceive as a "schtick" of mine.
I have labored to explain this to chump as well, and thus the "why" of my denial as it being a "schtick" in the first place, but he has not the mental capacity to understand, thus his misconceptions and error filled assumptions on the matter.
Yet it has led him to ridicule me and thus lead him closer to his Troll God, ME, by doing so, in giving me more opportunities to forgive him his ignorance in the matter.
Last edited by xmas1997; 09-28-2014 at 02:11 PM.
Self evident tbh.
Self evident to who? You?
What do you think you know that you may set yourself up as an authority on the matter?
One does not have to be an authority if the matter is self evident.
self-ev·i·dent
adjective
not needing to be demonstrated or explained; obvious.
"self-evident truths"
synonyms: obvious, clear, plain, evident, apparent, manifest, patent, axiomatic;
But one does have to think he is an authority in order to make such an assumption and claim in the first place.
Nope.
Read the definition.
I know the definition and have for years, but it does not support your contention in any way whatsoever.
That is not evident from your posts.Sure it does. I can't understand things for you. Keep trying.but it does not support your contention in any way whatsoever.
You made the claim.
Give me your proof.
It's self evident.
Keep trying.
So then you have no proof, thus your claim is preposterous and therefore most probably fallacious.
Chump Translation: I don't know what I am talking about and have no intelligent reply so I will just throw some bull out there for everyone who reads to play with.
I understand you perfectly.
Whereas you are still very much in the dark.
You will be redeemed.
OK, what part of "self-evident" are you having problems with?
Explain your difficulties.
Already told you I have no problems with "self-evident" per se.
But you made the claim that it was.
Support your argument that it is "self-evident".
The burden of proof is on you.
Or you were just talking out your ass again?
If it's self evident, none of that is necessary.Already told you I have no problems with "self-evident" per se.
But you made the claim that it was.
Support your argument that it is "self-evident".
The burden of proof is on you.
Or you were just talking out your ass again?
Because its self-evident.
Let me know if you still are having problems understanding.
No, you made the "claim" that it was self-evident without explaining "why".
You must support your argument that it is so, otherwise you were talking out your ass.
Anyone can say something is "self-evident", but just because they utter it, does not make it so.
Do you understand?
If it's self-evident, none of that is necessary.
Because it's self-evident.
Let me know if you still are having problems understanding.
So then I understand you made the preposterous claim of it being "self-evident" because you were talking out your ass because you had no proof that it was so.
Ok, I understand your convoluted logic now.
Nothing preposterous about it.
It's self evident.
That's all.
Says who?
You?
Just because YOU say it does not make it so.
Nah, it's being self evident allows it to be described as self evident.
If you want to try to present yourself as a God, fine. Seems really important to you.
What I do see is you made another "preposterous" opinion.
And you have no facts to base your opinion on.
Thus you are merely talking out your ass simply to hear the sound of your voice, or in this case, to see your written words.
No more is needed, you may retire now.
Your defensiveness and plea for me to stop makes the matter even more self-evident.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions