That's too bad, tbh..
The huge difference in the game was Christian Ponder. Everyone knew it beforehand.
Lololololool ol expert still at sub 500
"it gets easier
What happened to that storm with lightning? I feel robbed.
But.....it went just like I said it would, hence the 220 to win 200.
Anytime there is talk of ligtning, ya don't play with real $$$$.
Ok....
Denver - 7, they are 10-3 in this 'spot" coming off a bye week.
SD - 6.5, they lead the league in turnovers and Geno Smith turns it over.
NYG -4, the Falcons are like the Saints, they suck on the road.
Bears + 2.5, the Panthers have no backs, so third and long all day long.
Eagles - 7, a time tested trend....good teams coming off a loss now at home.
Saints -10, a must win for the Saints who are a different team at home vs a Buc;s team in a second consecutive road game.
Last edited by Avante; 10-03-2014 at 05:18 PM.
translationThe huge difference in the game was Christian Ponder. Everyone knew it beforehand.
Lololololool ol expert still at sub 500
"
You totally nailed it shut, yep, a perfect "spot" for a big Packers cover as you mentioned.
I do agree when there is talk if lightning, ya have to pass if dealing with real $$$$.
Just a question, but do you consider the Patriots a good team or just too unpredictable now?
I think the Bengals will cover the -1 but the Patriots are at home and were humiliated last week and it's hard to count Brady out even if he has looked terrible.
Cincy coming off a bye week 8-16 SU and 12=13 ATS. As a RF in 2013...1-4. Keep in mind while they are a good team they were only 3-5 on the road SU in 2013. Bottom line is they aren't the same as roadwarriors.
NE coming off a road loss and then back at home 5-0 ATS in that "spot' since 2012.
So we can see everything points towards the Pats in this "spot".
BUT...this looks like the best Bengals team we've seen in awhile and the worst Pats team. We can't ignore this.
I see the Pats in that "must" win*** vs a team that hasn't done all that coming off a bye week.
Yep, too many...?????? So why play it?
I gotta have something that strongly points to one side, I don't see that in this game.
*** talking about for their mind set/self respect. They can win their weakass division regardless of this game.
Cowboy running backs.
Their first stud back was a fullback (back then they were the main ball carriers) Don Perkins out of New Mexico, he was a slasher with good speed.
Calvin Hill an ivy leaguer from Yale (25 foot long jumper) was their first 1000 yard rusher. He was huge at 6-4, cat liked to try and jump over tacklers, yep....why?
Herschel Walker had "a" great season, then there was Tony Dorsett who is still their best back in my opinion. Smoothest runner ever and fast.
Emmitt Smith....hmmm?....how many times did we see him 4 yards down the field before seeing a defender? But, he did have enought good runs to put him in with the greats.
Now it's obviously DeMarco Murry who reminds me a lot of Chris Warren, a glider.
We see Duane Thomas (a blocking back for Mercury Morris at West Texas State) in the video, he did have some good runs but only one decent year.
Last edited by Avante; 10-03-2014 at 10:46 PM.
Reggie Bush
His Helix HS video is something else. Talk about looking like a video game, there it is.
Bush was a 10.4 sprinter but didn't run track while at USC. The thing about Bush is that he has always played the wrong position. This guy is a slot receiver not a running back. What a shame he wanted to play RB. With his speed/elusiveness and pass catching ability he was the next Rocket Ismail/Johnny Rodgers.
3-3, :-S..
why does it matter who flips a coin. its 50/50 regardless
So who thinks....
Denver
Seattle
Cincy
Indy
Chargers
...will lose more ATS plays than win the rest of the season? Who thinks the Jets, Raiders and Jags will win more ATS than they lose?
either make the picks or don't. talking about a system isn't impressive when you don't adhere to it on a weekly basis
The "system" doesn't exist, he just brings it up after another week of ty betting in order to cover his ass and pretend like he's not STILL under .500....
Dude just back Denver, Chargers, Indy, Seattle and go against Raiders Jets and Jags...BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not a brain in your head.
You are 13-14 on the season, yet you continue to thump your chest about your supposedly foolproof system
Next week...ATS
Cinncy at home coming off a loss.
Denver over the Jets
Packers over Miami
Chargers over Raiders
Hmmmm?
Why do you conitnue to act like a total moron? I have had...one...losing week and it gets easier as the season progresses.You are 13-14 on the season, yet you continue to thump your chest about your supposedly foolproof system
The problem with the sysyem is that being SB champs now the Seahawks are being over prized. Now add the missing Niners.
I think I'll add the Chargers and dump the Niners.
Now tell me do you see the Broncos, Colts, Bengals, Chargers losing more ATS plays than they win the rest of the season? Do you see the woeful Jets, Raiders and Jags winning more ATS plays than they lose?
2 points from going 4-2 today.
Last edited by Avante; 10-06-2014 at 12:00 AM.
Check it out heading into this week.
Look at those system teams....Niners, Broncos, Colts, Seahawks and Bengals ATS.
http://linemakers.sportingnews.com/a..._ATS_STANDINGS
Time to add the Chargers and dump the Niners.
Denver covered today and will be alright.
All those times better in the second half ATS.
Last edited by Avante; 10-06-2014 at 12:03 AM.
You have literally made this exact same excuse three weeks in a row and you're STILL under .500 on the season
Let's see how the....You have literally made this exact same excuse three weeks in a row and you're STILL under .500 on the season
Chargers
Seahawks
Broncos
Colts
Bengals
do ATS the rest of the season ..ok?
Last season after week 5 they had twice as many ATS wins as losses.
Right now that gang is 14-6 on the season.
Last edited by Avante; 10-06-2014 at 12:34 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
