Reply With Quote
Either way you'll be wrong small fry.
A...Seahawks kick Redskin ass.....34-10
B...Seahawks hang on...24-21
C...Redskins get a few breaks....21-20
D...Redskins kick that Seahawk ass...34-10
Well?
Either way you'll be wrong small fry.
Just like I was Thursday night...huh?
you didn't pick anybody Thursday night
~~~sheesh
This is what I posted...
Great "spot" tonight for a big Packer cover.
The Packers are 7-1-1 ATS the last 9 vs Minnesota. The Vikes are a weak 4-10ATS vs their division. The Packers get up for these division games going 15-5 the last three seasons ATS.
Now add the fact other than last week home teams have dominated these Thuesday night game.
Aaron Rodgers at home vs a gimpy rookie QB/Christian Ponder on the road, ya gotta play it.
I like this "spot" alot. Will play 220 to win 200 and lay the 8 points. I have no problems seeing a 30-17 type game.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Then with the talk of ligtning and a big storm I bailed out. Keep in mind I play with real $$$.
Gotta go with logic here and pick the superior team.
Going with D
Exactly. You didn't pick anyone. I'm 17-9 on the season, what's your record half pint?
So what do you look for?
So a team coming off a bye week on the road vs a team who lost at home and are at home again means nothing?
E. Avante dons the skirt and prunes the hedges for Judy during the game
Even I'm getting bored with Avante, the got.
So...ABCD?
If you can get the superior QB and that home field advantage also, that's a biggie. We don't see that tonight.
Look at these QB's at home so far in 2014.
Rodgers...2-0
Peyton...3-0
Luck....2-1
Nope RW isn't superior to Rodgers and Peyton.
Rivers...3-0
Brady...2-0
That's 12-1
so many perfect systems, yet you are 13-14
Is there any hope for me in 2014? No way I can bail myself out in the next 15 or so weeks....right?
past history says you're actually on a hot streak at 13-14
This thread is an F
Past history says I'm finally playing my real plays.
No stupid, this thread is an F
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=239548
You're on a roll slick.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=238339
Little , if you're going to play critic ya better have better than that crap you post, ok? You just got it stuck up your ass didn't ya?
Don't bother finding some ..o...thead of mine, I'm not the one going around playing critic, ok moron?
how would past history demonstrate that? you were sub 500 then and are sub 500 now
You're right I'll just do the best I can and hope I get a few breaks. I totally suck!
you stupid fat .
I can criticize you all day without starting one thread if I want.
It's like movie director trying to tell Ebert that he has no business saying the movie is a piece of
Yes you do. It's do ented as historical fact.
When you are posting threads that...NOBODY!!!!!!!!!!...gives a about, you might wanna shut the up about trying to tell others .
I can criticize you all day without starting one thread if I want.
It's like movie director trying to tell Ebert that he has no business saying the movie is a piece of
Last edited by Avante; 10-06-2014 at 05:25 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
