Do this, keep playing the Raiders plus the points every week for the next two seasons ....ok? Since 2012 they have gone....15-18-2 ATS.Oakland is 3-2 ATS, with covers against the Patriots and Chargers, teams with elite QB's. what does that say about the caliber of QB in oakland?
the raiders roster has had massive turnover from 2013 to 2014, let alone 2012. the comparison fails
that's pretty basic analysis. I would pick the Falcons just because you pick the Ravens. In fact, I think if I picked the opposite on gimme games of you for the rest of the season, I would have a higher % than you.
Is that not what you said?
WOW. you are actually using THESE old games as a reason to pick the Ravens? plus their games against them as the cleveland browns? WOWWWW.
i can just as easily say "the ravens haven't beaten the falcons since 2006." This is a great "spot" to pick the falcons. your historic trends are moronic
Boxscore finder: Atlanta Falcons vs Baltimore Ravens
Rk Day Date Tm Opp Tm Opp 1 Sun October 3, 1999 L Atlanta Falcons Baltimore Ravens 13 19 boxscore 2 Sun November 3, 2002 W Atlanta Falcons Baltimore Ravens 20 17 boxscore 3 Sun November 19, 2006 L Atlanta Falcons @ Baltimore Ravens 10 24 boxscore 4 Thu November 11, 2010 W Atlanta Falcons Baltimore Ravens 26 21 boxscore
Not even close!
The Old Browns lost to the Falcons by 17 in 1971, clearly this means the Ravens will lose by 17 to the Falcons. #AvanteLogic
yeah, that's called a lie.
The Ravens have won 8 of their last 12 games, the Falcons have won 4. The Ravens score a 31 on a system I use, the Falcons at 13. NOW.... ya add that above trend. It's a combo of a lot of things all pointing towards the Ravens in this "spot". There is nothing at all favoring the Falcons.
Pretty close.
look. if you want to pick the ravens because right now you think they're a mismatch for the struggling falcons, thats fine. thats a logical reason
when you start saying "they are 8-1 against the falcons" when they have played 4 times in the last 15 years, and only once since 2006, it just sounds dumb.
you're not 17-10 so apparently you think it's bogus.
You're re ed.
Blake....anytime I get a freak like you following me around like you do I with them, that's what the other couple years of my plays here were all about. Watching how you act over this is ing funny. You are a total freak guy and we all laugh our ass off at you.
This year it's Blake, time to get serious.
You were going to go against that system remember, you said it was bull . Want to go against it starting right now?
I will be using it in the second half of the season where it's really strong.
Why do I even know that stuff at all? Could it be I look for every angle/trend/stat available? You see something wrong with that?
The Niners have never lost a Monday night game in the Harbaugh era, they were 10-1 vs their division on MNF. The Rams had lost 6 in a row on MNF. You saw how that went.
18-19 after the hardest part of the season is sucking at this? Nobody should be as dumb as you are.
Hey stupid why not actually see how I do in the next....ELEVEN...weeks, ok?
It's pretty simple. Bet against the blowhard, know nothing... Win every time.
Being under .500 for 2.5 seasons is "sucking at this" for a self-proclaimed betting expert....
I was going to go against you using whatever system you wanted to, dumbass.
If you hadn't of pussied out when I brought real money into the deal, I'd be winning.
Ok man lets do that starting this week, ok? You game?
You'd be down 7 stupid, what you can't read?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote