Reply With Quote
They just keep coming....
Apparently it was.
http://www.thedailystar.net/black-holes-do-exist-46160
So we're still waiting for something peer reviewed, Avante.
They just keep coming....
ok so Avante is officially mouse now
Sorry, Avante. YouTubes don't count.
Just post one peer reviewed paper to back up your claim.
It's just another list, but yes -- Avante will never watch any of these either.
So we need to ignore what all these modern opinions say and go with what was said decades ago, oh yes that makes sense,.
Nope, just a guy who prefers to go with what is being said today instead of way back in the day.
you didn't even watch or read anything you posted
the last one talks about superclusters, which is something that was supposed to "debunk" the big bang theory but is actually rather adequately explained now that we know the universe is not only expanding but also accelerating. forces of gravity could very easily have created superclusters early on
you will also probably be able to find lots of links or videos that say obama was born in kenya. you will find links about the loch ness monster, about bigfoot, etc. you can find whatever you look for if you search hard enough.
do you understand what consensus means though?
No, we need peer reviewed papers that reflect real, legitimate research.
Established science is challenged all the time. But it has to withstand scrutiny itself. If you had bothered to look anywhere past the first Google entry about Laura Mersini-Houghton, you would have found out that her theory did not withstand scrutiny.
Why didn't you do that, Avante?
Big bang is being said today. Creationism was said back in the day way before big bang.
Do you even think about anything before you type?
How come we see so much of this?
Wrong as usual, I watched all the videos, I find them interesting. You sure are wrong a lotyou didn't even watch or read anything you posted
the last one talks about superclusters, which is something that was supposed to "debunk" the big bang theory but is actually rather adequately explained now that we know the universe is not only expanding but also accelerating. forces of gravity could very easily have created superclusters early on
you posted a 9 minute video 5 minutes after your previous post. this is inconsistent with your claim
you posted a lengthy article, and then 4 minutes later you put up a video of 7+ minutes
Consensus.....like in most humans on earth believe in a God? That consensus?
Because you are posting multiple parts of the same video.
i have been very clear in that i am referring to a consensus among those in the scientific community
Do you think at all before posting? Do you really think this is the first time I've had this discussion? I post on other sites guy. Seen all these videos, that's why I'm showing you.
So why haven't you posted any peer reviewed papers yet?
You know -- science?
So you can prove that...right?
so the guy who says we shouldn't waste time arguing about "what we don't know" is now saying he's had these same discussions on other sites... ok
one of your videos talked about red shifts and their supposed inconsistencies in quasars. can you explain this in your own words? you know, since you've seen the video before, and apparently remembered it enough to find the link really quickly.
just trying to get you to understand the difference between consensus and outlier opinions that have not been peer reviewed
I bring up why waste tiime on this over there also.so the guy who says we shouldn't waste time arguing about "what we don't know" is now saying he's had these same discussions on other sites... ok
one of your videos talked about red shifts and their supposed inconsistencies in quasars. can you explain this in your own words? you know, since you've seen the video before, and apparently remembered it enough to find the link really quickly.
I;m not playing this game with ya slick, I love music but have no idea how a CD is made, ok?
Last edited by Avante; 10-23-2014 at 01:14 AM.
Speaking of consensus...
http://www.space.com/25581-big-bang-theory-poll.html
Not scientists.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
