Reply With Quote
You missed a lot of good stuff, like where I pointed out you were making a fool of yourself about five times over.
Author has bachelors degree in English Lit.
Rejected by peer reviewed scientific journal as noted above. Thanks for proving you didn't read any of this.
You missed a lot of good stuff, like where I pointed out you were making a fool of yourself about five times over.
Look ya sick , go away go away go away, nobody likes you ya ing idiot, go away go away. I don't read you and never really have, you just get in everyones way. Dude have a little self respect, ok? GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Start a thread got, stay out of everyone elses, ok asshole?
I can see why you would want to change the subject to me.
Your "argument" was the most shallow Google regurgitation I have ever seen.
Just another list.
GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There's really no need to meltdown, Avante.
We're just talking about science here -- well, I am anyway.
As we are seeing there are tons of articles and videos that all over THE BIG BANG.......why is that?
Not an once of self respect, I pity you freak. Dude, I haven't read anything you've post here. I just know it will be stupid, that doesn't bother you at all, knowing I don't read you yet you follow me around, you really this ed up? You are aren't ya? Dude, go bother others, ok? Maybe they will read you, I don't and won't be...ok got?
They actually do nothing to the theory as none of it is science. Any dumbass can make a video and many dumbasses do.
Again, post a peer reviewed paper that contradicts the big bang theory and then we'll have something to talk about.
It's all you have to do.
Get to Googlin'.
I think enough other people will read our exchange to be quite entertained.
Totally worth it. I sure learned somethings about pseudoscience and its propagandists.
I have never in all my time doing this came across anyone as far gone as this freak. Almost 90.000 posts and it's all about seeing who he can bother, is that sad or want? No threads, nothing but......I BOTHERED YOU DIDN'T I, ADMIT IT!!!!!!!, I did.....YIPPEEEEEEE I BOTHERED SOMEBODY......as he s all over himself, wow!!!!!!!!
Incest?
Dude, I was talking about the topic you brought up.
Why make this about me?
Reminds me of a I once knew, she wanted you to talk dirty to her, made her hot. The dirtier you talked the hotter she got, hahahaha!!!!!!! This little freak is just like that. he gets off on you calling him names and talking about his stupidity, he loves it. He wants to hear.....you sick .....makes him wet.
I admit it's funny watching you try to argue with a list of YouTube and copied Google links. I just wonder why you think that counts as a reasoned, coherent argument.
I don't understand the rage at this point -- unless you just realize you aren't coming off as very intelligent at this point and are eager to change the subject to anything other than what you dared us to discuss with you in the first place.
Is that really it?
Avante.....dude, I don't read you, ok?
ChumptyDumpty.....yakyakyakyakyakblahblahblahyakya kblah
Avante....I don't read you, ok?
ChumpthDumpty...yakyakyakyakyakyakyakblahblahblah
Avante...ah....hmmm?.....litle guy...I...don't...read...you...ok?
ChumptyDumpty.....blahblahblahyakyakyakyaskyak.
Avante
Well you've obviously read some of this. You quoted me several times.
Why even post here if you don't want to read any responses?
He's not going to go away is he? He simply doesn't care how sad it is to watch him follow me around knowing I don't read him. Who would want to do that? I'm guessing he has nobody and is lonely. Hmmmmmmmm....or maybe he really is a got, a and has a thing for me. That's it isn't it, a ing .
Well, you proved you do read me earlier. I don't know why you think you can get away with saying you don't.
And as I said before, if you say you are going to ignore me, go ahead and really ignore me.
I've never seen anything like this, wow! So lonely he has to follow people around who wish he'd choke to death, sad.
I never have either tbh. I think you might make a comeback in the meltdown poll. I voted for you.
Ok it's time for my beauty sleep, no doubt I'll wake up tomorrow prettier than I was today.
As you all can see I trolled the boy bad, real bad, almost feel guilty it was that bad, hahahaha!!!!!!!!!! And he'll be back tomorrow for more.....hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A little traveling music.
Hey Avante
And Donald Trump has a bachlors degree in music whats your point?
You can't challenge the findings so you attack the messenger?
You and your Darwin salad tossers are thinning out each day as more and more "Scientist" dive off the Big Bang wagon.
Rejected by peer reviewed scientific journal as noted above.
Do you even know what "peer" even means? You think Scientist who have good paying jobs or represent a major College are going to go against what is already in the text books? get off your "peer" trip and just debunk our evidence.
I don't have to read "old News" the Evolution debate ended years ago your side lost huge with the DNA code it's over and you can't comprehend it.Thanks for proving you didn't read any of this.
New evidence on Neanderthal mixing
New research on a 45,000-year-old Siberian thighbone has narrowed the window of time when humans and Neanderthals interbred to between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago, and has shown that modern humans reached northern Eurasia substantially earlier than some scientists thought.
Carbon dating and molecular analysis filled in many of the blanks about the sample. Testing determined that the sample was from an individual who lived 45,000 years ago on a diet that included plants or plant eaters and fish or other aquatic life.
Reich and Fu said the sample was remarkable because of the extraordinary preservation of its DNA, which allowed Fu, using the latest techniques for ancient DNA analysis, to extract a high-quality genome sequence. The sequence, Reich said, is significantly higher in quality than most genome sequences of present-day people generated for analysis of disease risk.
Reich said the findings on mutation rate have sweeping implications, and provide a basis for reinterpreting key dates in human prehistory. Instead of humans and Neanderthals becoming distinct offshoots sometime between 270,000 and 380,000 years ago, for example, the slower rate would put that shift much further back in time, between 550,000 and 770,000 years ago. Similarly, the slower rate pushes back estimates for the date of the separation of African and non-African populations.
"The slow mutation rates indicate that the present-day subdivisions among human populations date back to almost 200,000 years ago, well before the period around 50,000 years ago when the archaeological record do ents art and new styles of toolmaking," Reich said.
"The implication is that the spread of modern human behavior must have been cultural, at least in part. Based on the genetic dates, it cannot be the case of a single population that developed modern human behavior spread all around the world replacing the other humans who already lived there."
http://phys.org/news/2014-10-evidence-neanderthal.html
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-23-2014 at 10:17 AM.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
