Legalized marijuana spreads to two more states and D.C. Next up, California.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Again what I personally have done is both irrelevant and none of your business.

you said "we" have gained political ground. Have you done anything or do you want to revise your statement to "they" have gained political ground?

Why am I not surprised that you spent your time overseas watching television?

there were tv's in most cafes, hard not to watch. You haven't been to Amsterdam I take it.

We don't know precisely what will or will not happen. You speaking with certainty is a waste of time. I expect a fully legal industry to try and boost sales through advertisement channels they have available. If you don't want to consider the possibility then don't.

you likened weed commercials to beer commercials, I will tell you with certainty it will be nothing of the sort. It was a stupid take, own it.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

you said "we" have gained political ground. Have you done anything or do you want to revise your statement to "they" have gained political ground? there were tv's in most cafes, hard not to watch. You haven't been to Amsterdam I take it.

you likened weed commercials to beer commercials, I will tell you with certainty it will be nothing of the sort. It was a stupid take, own it.

I was not the one that brought up TV and as of now there are no laws that preclude it per se.

The rest of your bull is meaningless. Your two weeks in amsterdam is not indicative of anything and you confusion over what the pronouns I use is another red herring as it doesn't matter.

I get that I fascinate you but I am not interested, weirdo.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I was not the one that brought up TV and as of now there are no laws that preclude it per se.

You stupid stoner .

Post #4

When I gets fully legalized then you will see an industry that of course will market their product. Think beer commercials.

So who brought up TV again?

The rest of your bull is meaningless. Your two weeks in amsterdam is not indicative of anything and you confusion over what the pronouns I use is another red herring as it doesn't matter.

I get that I fascinate you but I am not interested, weirdo.

So you haven't been to Amsterdam and you did nothing personally to further the political movement for legalization. Thanks for straightening that out.

[rogues]

smh..don't do drugs kids..

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You stupid stoner .

Post #4 So who brought up TV again?


So you haven't been to Amsterdam and you did nothing personally to further the political movement for legalization. Thanks for straightening that out.

Are beer commercials only on TV? I was thinking of how the beer industry pursues advertising to expand sales. Your reading and critical thinking skills are god awful.

I have not said what I have or have not done. You can come up to whatever fantasy conclusions you would like with your version of critical thinking; I still am not interested.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

And let's just be clear, posturing over what might or might not be allowed in a mostly undefined hypothetical future is a waste of time.

I personally want to go back 40 years or so and find the behavioral psychologist who came up with the notion of not showing consumption on air and slap them.

I only support censorship in cases like with tobacco where they had intentionally misled the public and abused the right of free expression. OTOH, I do not support legislation without such cause.

So you would support censorship of marijuana advertisements even if it was legal in the area where it was broadcast?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Are beer commercials only on TV? I was thinking of how the beer industry pursues advertising to expand sales. Your reading and critical thinking skills are god awful.

What are these not on TV commercials you speak of?

I have not said what I have or have not done. You can come up to whatever fantasy conclusions you would like with your version of critical thinking; I still am not interested.

You can simply just say you haven't been to Amsterdam and were not aware they do not have weed commercials being shown like beer commercials.

[TheSanityAnnex]

So you would support censorship of marijuana advertisements even if it was legal in the area where it was broadcast?

Not at all. Just letting you know it is stupid to "think beer commercials".

[FuzzyLumpkins]

What are these not on TV commercials you speak of?

You can simply just say you haven't been to Amsterdam and were not aware they do not have weed commercials being shown like beer commercials.

Not at all. Just letting you know it is stupid to "think beer commercials".

Web, radio, and print.

Your experience in Amsterdam is not representative of what it is actually like. You can keep repeating yourself but that still isn't going to change, dimwit.

And so you are simply being asshurt and trying to win a point like a petty fool. Why am I not surprised.

You're boring again. Go huff Raid for awhile; I am done wasting my time with you.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Web, radio, and print.

cant say I've ever seen a web beer commercial...radio and print commercials, obsolete.

Your experience in Amsterdam is not representative of what it is actually like. You can keep repeating yourself but that still isn't going to change, dimwit.

what was your experience then? I saw no weed commercials.

And so you are simply being asshurt and trying to win a point like a petty fool. Why am I not surprised.

You're boring again. Go huff Raid for awhile; I am done wasting my time with you.

simply pointing out your foolish assumptions. You must get some ty weed wherever you're at, I've never encountered a grumpier stoner.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Cannabis ads are in the NYT:

First-ever full-page New York Times marijuana ad runs

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/first-ev...juana-ad-runs/

Just happened a few months ago. I keep saying that as the boomer generation dies off, things are going to change significantly. I have already benefited from their retirement.

[boutons_deux]

blaming the "boomers" for all kinds of is part of the VRWC propaganda to confuse people (many rednecks love being confused and lied to) while deflecting blame from the real culprits, just like the VRWC propaganda of "gotta privatize SS because it's bankrupt", "gotta kill hyper-inflation because ...", "national debt is a disaster, so kill the safety net, privatize medicare", etc, etc. LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE (all self-serving)

[FuzzyLumpkins]

blaming the "boomers" for all kinds of is part of the VRWC propaganda to confuse people (many rednecks love being confused and lied to) while deflecting blame from the real culprits, just like the VRWC propaganda of "gotta privatize SS because it's bankrupt", "gotta kill hyper-inflation because ...", "national debt is a disaster, so kill the safety net, privatize medicare", etc, etc. LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE (all self-serving)

thanks moonbat.

The behavior of your voting block is well do ented and pointing to your simpleminded boogeyman is not going to change that.

[boutons_deux]

thanks moonbat.

The behavior of your voting block is well do ented and pointing to your simpleminded boogeyman is not going to change that.

you probably don't have the data, but Ms of boomers got ed along with the rest of the economy in 2008, and Ms of them,due to their age, are still ed, with no jobs, or much lower paying jobs.

Blaming boomers is part of the propaganda to deflect from the real culprits

[FuzzyLumpkins]

you probably don't have the data, but Ms of boomers got ed along with the rest of the economy in 2008, and Ms of the,due to their age, are still ed, with no jobs, or much lower paying jobs.

I don't have the data to prove your argument?

You reap what you sow.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/...oomers/263291/

Just because you are greedy and self serving does not mean that no negative outcome will happen. Boomers are the worst generation since the one born at the beginning of the 20th century. It is what it is.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Cannabis ads are in the NYT:

First-ever full-page New York Times marijuana ad runs

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/first-ev...juana-ad-runs/

Just happened a few months ago. I keep saying that as the boomer generation dies off, things are going to change significantly. I have already benefited from their retirement.

I almost mistook that for a beer commercial.

[boutons_deux]

it's not generational conflict, dumbass. That's propaganda semen you've swallowed like gay in a bath house.

it's the Class Warfare, that really got going in the 1970s when "movement conservatism" aka VRWC, got organized, busting unions, cutting taxes on BigCorp and wealthy, and getting their hatchet men in power under St Ronnie The Diseased.

Big Picture stuff, too big your -for-brains.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

it's not generational conflict, dumbass. That's propaganda semen you've swallowed like gay in a bath house.

it's the Class Warfare, that really got going in the 1970s when "movement conservatism" aka VRWC, got organized, busting unions, cutting taxes on BigCorp and wealthy, and getting their hatchet men in power under St Ronnie The Diseased.

Big Picture stuff, too big your -for-brains.

Thanks Imus but speak for yourself. We will see how far your class paradigm flies. In the meantime, the millennials HATE your demographic. Likely because of the anti-millennial smear campaign.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...766_Page3.html

I can find a LOT more if you want to argue the point.

[boutons_deux]

Thanks Imus but speak for yourself. We will see how far your class paradigm flies. In the meantime, the millennials HATE your demographic. Likely because of the anti-millennial smear campaign.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...766_Page3.html

I can find a LOT more if you want to argue the point.

Ben can GFY. there's no DATA is there that refutes the Class War explanation, not generational war.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Ben can GFY. there's no DATA is there that refutes the Class War explanation, not generational war.

http://www.phillymag.com/news/2013/1...st-generation/

http://reason.com/archives/2012/07/1...y-boomers-vs-y

http://www.salon.com/2014/10/20/baby..._and_annoying/

http://www.esquire.com/features/worst-generation-0400

http://www.economist.com/node/21563725

And what do not mutually exclusive mean? I get that you hold to the marxist ideal but even if you are right, that does not preclude me from being right.