This team needs more offense. Parker is carrying the load because no one else is creating their own shot.
Iso wax 011 correct as far as early losses go? Tony was well on 012 and 013 and the Spurs went deep both times and should have won one. The ball movement was starting and being perfected before last years finals tbh and he was a part of it.
This team needs more offense. Parker is carrying the load because no one else is creating their own shot.
This is the problem that some folks here have as they misinterpret a correlation between Tony and some losses. They interpret it as Tony messing up the game and the causal relationship is just the opposite. Because the team is messing up, Tony tries to get them back in it and scores because no one else is doing it. Last night he scored 22 in the first half because everyone else was struggling. In the second half he missed some shots, but the game was still close (two points ) when he left in the third quarter. When the bench gave up a 10 point lead to N.O. and Pop put the starters back in in the fourth, Parker only took one more shot during the whole game. And he made that one. But he still gets the blame for having 'taken over' the game. He was, if anything, too passive in the fourth on offense, but the narrative is what it is.
Or maybe they would have more opportunities to create their shots if the french got passed the ball more often
Then player A would have 14 assists.
Seriously though FG% tells the whole picture a lot better than your "let's imagine" fantasy.
Well i didnt say parker did that. All i was trying to bring about was that just coz someone shot 61% from the field doest mean hes not at fault
I didnt say parker did that. So player A has a 61% fg and 14 assists in this scenario. You cant say he played well coz of that which means fg% dun tell the whole picture
Funny how on ST, the post that actually respond to the question goes always unnoticed.
Doesn't fit the OP's agenda, unfortunately.
/thread
THREAD
In the wins, TP scores more because he takes less shots , but good shots, so he is more efficient; he doesnt do that re ed Enrique act; also he has more assists on those wins
Conclusion: Spurs win when he is not selfish
Spurs had a 62-20 season last year. thats 75.6% wins.
when tony score 25+ points, spurs win 8 out of 11. thats 72.7% wins.
Conclusion: Spurs do better when tony dun score more than 25+ points.
Last edited by hyhy; 11-10-2014 at 11:08 AM.
Please explain to me how Danny green was struggling at the start?
At the start when tony decides to pass to him, we were doing so well. After that, he decides to go enrique mode and ignored danny so many times when he was open at the 3.
That's a way to spin it lol.
Your math is wrong though.
How so?
I didnt want to extract the games that Tony shot 25+ from the season wins, because the % is already lower and if you remove that you will just get a higher %..
Last edited by hyhy; 11-10-2014 at 11:07 AM.
You don't take the 82 game sample when 8/11 sample is being used.
and.. what do I take?
That short bus Double Standard
Who did you want taking shots last night? Please explain. Stupid .
0-1 but Kawhi got his numbers tho MVP1!!!
- Kawhiturds
Damn b. Didn't you just say yesterday that Kawhi scoring 30+ with no assists was a good game?
Who did you want taking shots last night? Please explain. Stupid .
Parker scoring 30+ efficiently and Spurs lose = Enrique hero baller's fault0-1 but Kawhi got his numbers tho MVP1!!!
- Kawhiturds
Kiwi scoring 30+ efficiently with Zero assists and Spurs lose =
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
